<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Roseanne Barr&apos;s View</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php</link>
<description>All comments for Roseanne Barr&apos;s View</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>adam</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084989</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084989</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 17:43:40 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I knew I was going to get nailed for that&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>adam</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084985</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084985</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 17:40:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I was speaking in a relative sense&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>feefey</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084908</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084908</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:33:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;At least Roosie was armed with information.&quot;

Pure f**king comedy gold.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ared</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084864</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084864</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:55:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Adam.  Roseanne lacks the credibility of Rosie O&apos;Donnell, whose &quot;the government was in on 9/11&quot; theories were well-informed and not at all paranoid delusional.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>will.xls</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084863</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084863</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:54:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;At least Roosie was armed with information.&quot;

Yeah, like that 9/11 conspiracy stuff. The shiny side of the tinfoil goes on the outside. It reflects the government&apos;s mind rays. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>adam</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084849</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084849</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:42:40 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;She sounds like an idiot when she talks about politics.  At least Roosie was armed with information.  Roseanne goes overboard.  For example, I heard her on Stern trying say that there should be income caps.  That would go over like a fart in a church.  It takes away credibility&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ared</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084704</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084704</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:45:35 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Whew.  For a moment, I was worried The View might stop setting women back.  Just in time, Roseanne drops-in to make the world safe for every anti-woman stereotype going.  Thank you, Media Gods!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Nimuë LaMer</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084667</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084667</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:21:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Joan Rivers: Too brash
Whoopi Goldberg: Too smart 
Kathy Griffin: Too annoying 
Kathie Lee Gifford: Too timid/easily spooked 
Connie Chung: Too Newsy 
Bette Midler: Too showy

Roseanne Barr: Baby Bear&apos;s Porridge/Lesser of all the Evils.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>SP</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084652</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084652</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:06:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ok, so i watched the video and i take part of what i said back. her politics are spot on, and she isnt fat. but her voice is still just as shrill and grating as ever. she&apos;s funny too, and she just might offset that neo stepford wife-esque hasselbeck tart.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>SP</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084624</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/05/02/barr.php#comment-1084624</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 12:44:28 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;is there some kind of quota for fat annoying pain in the ass beyotch that they have to fill or something?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>