http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php All comments for Hot Wheels en-us 2007 jen Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss jen@gothamist.com jen@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081376 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081376 Comments Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:51 -0500 <p>at Vos Iz Neias you will find a great picture of this story </p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081240 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081240 Comments Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:11:25 -0500 <p>images.google.com/images?q=troxler%20gauge Real troxler gauge pictures, for example...</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081239 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081239 Comments Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:09:06 -0500 <p>I concur with the flux capacitor analysis! It even says "DISCONNECT CAPACITOR DRIVE BEFORE OPENING"!! 1.21 JIGAWATTS [sic]!!! </p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081181 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081181 Comments Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:04:48 -0500 <p>Troxler Gauge Schmoxler Gauge - that guy is lying. That's a Flux Capacitor, and that silver Mercedes was the Delorean's replacement. 1.21 Gigawatts!</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081178 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/28/hot_wheels_1.php#comment-1081178 Comments Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:52:08 -0500 <p>Isn't it a bit disingenuous -- and alarmist -- to call a gauge, even if it has radiological components, a "nuclear device"? The term "nuclear device" refers to explosives, whether used as weapons or for excavation, not to construction devices.</p>