<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: McGreevey Divorce Gets Contentious––and More Public</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php</link>
<description>All comments for McGreevey Divorce Gets Contentious––and More Public</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Kay</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072880</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072880</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:36:47 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;First of all Jim McGreevey is a piece of dirt who used his wife as a beard to further his career. Now he is trying to get her money and daughter from her permanently. He lied to her and to his NJ constituents. Being gay isn&apos;t his problem. His problem is being a user, liar, and a sneak.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Luke</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072414</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072414</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:32:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Kamila, you probably don&apos;t know any parents that have nude art in their homes because of the America factor. In other countries like many in Europe, the human body is treated more as a fact of life, and tasteful nudity is something seen commonly. What&apos;s the harm? If anything, normalizing the human body is a good thing!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jeffrey</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072339</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072339</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:00:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;For clarity the &apos;other man&apos; is gay and therefore doesn&apos;t like vaginas.  I&apos;m pretty sure that includes really young ones too.  What kind of threat does he constitute to her?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kamilla</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072213</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072213</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:30:31 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;While it is certainly normal for a child to seek solace from a parent after a nightmare, I think it is highly inappropriate for McGreevey&apos;s daughter to share his bed while he is sleeping with another man.

Anything can be called &apos;art&apos;.  A crucifix dipped in urine, a feces splattered picture of the Virgin Mary, and yes, nude men.  But, the question is, is it appropriate for a child?  Frankly, I don&apos;t know any parents that have large nude pictures in a room that children  have access to.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Luke</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072160</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/21/mcgreevey_divor.php#comment-1072160</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:33:15 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not sure how old his daughter is, but as long as she is still fairly young what&apos;s wrong with the allegations against him? It&apos;s normal enough for young children to sleep in their parents bed every once in a while (if they are scared, having trouble sleeping, etc.), and I doubt Dina would be so concerned if it was another woman he was partnered with. As for the nude photo, god forbid she see an image of a nude man (which I imagine is composed tastefully). Sounds like Dina is the one being unreasonable. Not homophobic eh? Yeah right. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>