<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Is Chumley&apos;s Being 86&apos;d By Unstable Wall?</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is Chumley&apos;s Being 86&apos;d By Unstable Wall?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>stewart</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061963</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061963</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 08:03:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;just as selfish as your &quot;you have yours, it&apos;s not fair, screw you&quot; attitude. it is what it is. grow up.&quot;

It&apos;s bad economic policy. It&apos;s inefficient and makes real estate cost more for everyone. It disincentivizes landlords to make capital improvements. 

I can afford a nice apartment, but some of my friends live in 2 bedroom apartments with 2 or 3 other people and STILL pay more than most people who benefit from rent control. How is this fair?

It&apos;s essentially parasitic. People who benefit from rent control are like fleas on a dog. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>stewart</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061961</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061961</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:53:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;just as selfish as your &quot;you have yours, it&apos;s not fair, screw you&quot; attitude. it is what it is. grow up.&quot;

you must be a civil servant&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chris</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061390</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061390</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:29:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Only been to Chumley&apos;s once, thought it was pretty cool though, I&apos;ll have to make sure I go again before it gets demolished.  Hopefully a brick won&apos;t fall in my beer though, heck of a way to ruin a good beer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061346</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061346</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:51:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Something&apos;s definitely wrong with the way this building is being handled. There was a chimney collapse last summer that ruined two floors and they&apos;ve had a &quot;stop work order&quot; sign on the site for months now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>screw you!</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061320</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061320</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:00:42 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;just as selfish as your &quot;you have yours, it&apos;s not fair, screw you&quot; attitude. it is what it is. grow up. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stewart</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061304</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061304</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:47:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This highlights yet another interesting side effect of rent control. The tenants have more rights than the landowner, so much so that they were unable to repair the building, and now it will probably be demolished and no one can live there.

Rent control is ultimately selfish. To all of these people with their &quot;I got mine, screw you&quot; attitude: please, just die already.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>John</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061302</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061302</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:42:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ll chain myself to Scott and Zelda&apos;s booth if the wrecking ball starts swinging. Tragic if that place goes down&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tim N.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061141</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061141</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:52:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;NY1 is reporting that DOB says the building isn&apos;t in danger of collapsing.  Though it does make one wonder why they evacuated half of the area.  

Chumley&apos;s is/was cool.  It was a big Beat hangout and tried to keep the vibe going.  I like/liked it a lot.

Oh, and BTW, once again, the first place I find out what&apos;s going on (except for the street) is the Gothamist gang.  Nice job, guys.  I can deal with the typos.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bob</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061130</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061130</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:35:50 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;86 Bedford Street is in the GV Historic District and is a LANDMARK

demo requires permission of the LPC and Dept of Buildings&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>will</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061085</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061085</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:28:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;you know, chumley&apos;s had an interesting space and its too bad if the building gets torn down, but it really was kind of an awful bar. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>edEx</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061071</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/05/is_chumleys_bei.php#comment-1061071</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:10:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;landmark status should have been applied for years ago, this way the owners would have to renovate instead of demolish.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>