http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php All comments for Ouroussoff Calls Nouvel Buildings "Eye Candy" en-us 2007 jen Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss jen@gothamist.com jen@gothamist.com 60 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058841 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058841 Comments Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:03:12 -0500 <p>Eye candy? He must have meant eyesore.</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058827 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058827 Comments Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:27:31 -0500 <p>I agree. This NY Times reviewer is probably among the same people who praised the ugly confining early 1970s green/blue glass architecture. I saw this building and I just thought to myself "what an ugly, cheap looking, glass building; I wonder how much people are going to pay for the Broadway noise and the glass windows which are all looking quite filthy".</p> http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058760 http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/02/ouroussoff_call.php#comment-1058760 Comments Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:52:37 -0500 <p>The Soho building is butt ugly.</p>