Manhattan Has the Richest White Toddlers In the Country

Wow, some very wild data from the U.S. Census about the make-up of New York. Accordin to the NY Times, the number of Manhattan children under the age of 5 has increased by more than 32%, and half of that growth is attributed to wealthy white families. And get this:

The analysis shows that Manhattan’s 35,000 or so white non-Hispanic toddlers are being raised by parents whose median income was $284,208 a year in 2005, which means they are growing up in wealthier households than similar youngsters in any other large county in the country.

Among white families with toddlers, San Francisco ranked second, with a median income of $150,763, followed by Somerset, N.J. ($136,807); San Jose, Calif. ($134,668); Fairfield, Conn. ($132,427); and Westchester ($122,240).

In comparison, the median income of other Manhattan households with toddlers was $66,213 for Asians, $31,171 for blacks and $25,467 for Hispanic families.

Nuts! There are also interesting thoughts on what this means: Wealthy families - especially dual-income ones where both parents work - are staying in the city instead of waving the white flag and retreating to the suburbs; the gap between the classes is widening even more, and other poorer classes will be priced out; and the city's vibrancy is keeping yuppies here, though the lack of good schooling - private and public - may force some stalwarts to move.

We found it interesting that two history professors, Fred Siegel of Cooper Union and Kenneth T. Jackson of Columbia, thought the information about a strong upper-middle-class was positive. Jackson told the Times, "Imagine the reverse — that nobody with money wants to live here, and then you have Detroit. I don’t see how anybody benefits in that circumstance.” Yeah - we see the growth in the following careers: Highly paid tutors who can deal with high maintenance parents when their kids don't get into the right pre-school, elaborate and wasteful children's party planners (we're totally going to learn how to make balloon animals for extra scratch), and kiddie chauffeurs.

Email This Entry


Comments (70) [rss]

that is absolutely crazy!!.. but I can't seem I'm completely surprised by the numbers

;-)
EW
www.everydayweekender.com

user-pic

"nobody with money wants to live here, and then you have Detroit."

I moved here from Detroit, and that is the funniest things I've heard in a long time! (Yes, funny because it's true.)

"$284,208"

NYC is over...

user-pic

I'm one of the people in that income bracket and I have a 2-year-old. Remind me why I should move to the burbs? For the cost of my mortgage on a large 2BR here, I would get a large house in the burbs. But we'd also have to commute a long distance to work, spending an extra hour or two round trip that I could spend with my kid. Plus I'd have unnecessary car payments, gas, etc, and I'd be really far from all the things that I like to do. Moving out would be retarded. The burbs suck.

user-pic

fresh air, a backyard for your kid to play in, the freedom to run around and ride bicycles down the street with a group of friends,losing the sense of nyc entitlement and snobbery that most rich people here have...

user-pic

who knew jen was such a kid hater?

user-pic

My Kids' backyard is central Park. He has more green in walking distance than a lot of kids in the suburbs. Certainly more than I did growing up.

I can't speak for the snobs and entitlement however. My kid will be in public school if I can help it, and the people who are snotty, I can live without. But maybe thats because i come from less affluent background.

"Moving out would be retarded. The burbs suck."

Right, that's why tons and tons of people move to them. My main reason for moving out would be for schools and outdoor space. Things that are perfectly normal and accessible in the suburbs are a huge pain in the ass and a luxury in the city, unless you've got 1. time and 2. a car. As for the schools, I know there are great public schools in NYC, but it just seems it's such a feast or famine scenario where the premier magnet schools get tons of resources and every other school is SOL. Also, the insanity surrounding exam admission/lottery admission to public schools is completely foreign to me and I don't want to subject my kids to it. I don't want to send my children to private schools, so that's out.

I hear you about the commute, though - were I to move out to the suburbs, I'd probably just try to get a job in them, too (like in Stamford or something). The pay cut may actually be worth it for the time gain.

That's great, josh.
There's some GREAT public schools out there now. I wouldn't worry bout the snotty parents. I'd worry bout bullying more. Lots of jealousy out there.
Having Central Park as one's backyard is great, can't wait till I ride a bike with my kid there. We already skateboard there.
The burbs is SCARY. Ever visit a Wal-Mart on a weekend?

user-pic

Um, is this really news? I've been on the upper west side for the past 4 years and have constantly been run over, hit and squeezed out of the sidewalks by the bugaboo strollers and perky overcaffeinated moms. It's no news to me that they are married to wealthy hedge funders and law firm partners. And no, they do not work because I see them on my days off. And no, I am not exaggerating.

"Right, that's why tons and tons of people move to them"

See, sucking is subjective. It's taste, and to me the burbs suck. I assure you, your favorite band sucks too. :)

See I think that most of the stuff that's accessible in the city is a huge pain in the ass in the burbs. I need milk? I walk a block. I want beer? I walk to the corner. I want sushi at 2 am? I make a phone call. My kid is dehydrated from the flu and I need to be at the hospital? I'm there in 5 minutes from my door.

Sure you can get to the mountains from the burbs, but you know what? There's great hiking within45 minutes ride of the city, and when I need a car, I can just rent one to get there.

The school stuff scares me too, honestly. We'll figure it out, or lie about our address :)

It's all about what you personally like, but the longer i live in the city, the more I can't stand the burbs when I go back home to my visit my mom.

user-pic

you need a lot of money to raise your kids properly in the city...that's why most parents move to the suburbs because it's more affordable while maintaining a quality of life that's equal to or better

having said that, I don't plan on having kids and I'm pretty much destined to stay within Manhattan. All my friends that do have children ended up moving out to Jersey, LI, or Westchester

#10 is right about the crowds of overcaffeinated understimulated bugaboo moms (and the occasional dad) on weekdays. My wife and I both work to stay where we are, and I think she'd kill herself if she had nothing to do buy sit and bitch about the size of her husband's bonus while rocking the kid in the bugaboo.

That said, don't front on my stroller, and I'll keep it off your damn feet. I promise.

Don't worry bout the schools too much. I know 16 years ago my area was a ghetto. Then the development boom happened in the eighties. Buildings were renovated, restaurants started appearing, hookers and dealers disappearing.
Now it's a great neighborhood because of the change, More families, More affluent residents. More parents involved in their child's education.
I tried fibbing our address, didn't work. We still got into a great public school though.

user-pic

however as much as I'd rather raise a child in the city, the chances of your kid getting asthma and sick are exponentially greater since well...this city is super-filthy

I think the reason that that section of the population has more kids is b/c they wait 'til they're in their 40s to have kids, but need to use fertility drugs to get pregnant, therefore they have more twins and multiple births

Whatever, it's their choice, I just wish they'd choose to leave their children home when they dine at good restaurants more often.
God, I hate having my dinner ruined by mewling brats.

#12 "All my friends that do have children ended up moving out to Jersey, LI, or Westchester"

Me too. about half of them have moved back within 3 years.

You know i didn't see an article bemoaning the loss of 30,000 of the city's blacks in the past 7 years.

It probably depends on the burbs that you grew up in.

I grew up 20 minutes outside of San Francisco and loved it. It was a very diverse area (none of that burbs are homogenous argument for me - my neighbors were of all sorts of races) and I still got the culture of San Francisco within a short drive. We went to SF several times a week. I saw operas, ballets, went to museums. I breathed in fresh air. I learned about Trinidadian and Muslim cultures (see the Times article)- I had classmates from both places (and many more). I went to a wonderful school on 34 wooded acres. We explored the woods during recess and studied tide pools and creeks on weekends. Groceries were five minutes down the hill, and sushi places, etc also delivered. There were several hospitals nearby (10 minutes or so) so that was never a problem.

I loved growing up in the burbs! Obviously, not all burbs are the same, but there are certainly wonderful urban and suburban childhoods that can be had by living in them.

"Whatever, it's their choice, I just wish they'd choose to leave their children home when they dine at good restaurants more often. God, I hate having my dinner ruined by mewling brats."

Me too. I take my kid out all the time to restaurants, but only noisy ones. He's decent in them, but when he does misbehave, we run. People, with kids or without, are just generally inconsiderate.

I'm grappling with the issue right now over whether to stay here and play the game of making tons of cash so that I can raise kids here, or to leave and go somewhere that has decent public schools. I find the public schools in NYC fairly scary. I was a public school teacher for three years here, and I went to public school myself (though not in NYC), so I desperately want to believe that they are decent, but I just can't. Private schools creep me out a little. I don't want my kid to be in a bad school, but I also don't want my kid to grow up alongside the children of the super-wealthy. Because they are REALLY scary.

Yea I've never been run over on the sidewalk by any single people or couples without kids. They are all so nice. [commence eye rolling]

user-pic

the suburbs of new york city suck more than the suburbs of other parts of the country

"the suburbs of new york city suck more than the suburbs of other parts of the country"

I grew up in the outer NY suburbs (central Jersey) and I also lived for 6 years in the DC suburbs, (MD and VA). The DC ones sucked worse. I can't speak for SF burbs, but 20 minutes from downtown is barely the suburbs and sounds more like inside the city sprawl limits.

I guess this is a good sign, although these people are helping to make the city unaffordable for normal people.

Nah, it was an entirely different county. Not at all part of SF, just didn't have to cross any bridges to get there.

what kind of jobs do they people have making that kind of money?

I rather buy a nice size house in the suburbs than pay rent or buy and 2x2 shack in the city.

I have a question to all the dual income families who stay in NYC and fall into this income bracket. Do you pay someone to watch your kid every day while you work? I agree with what someone else said about space and outdoor life, which is probably why my husband and I will move away once our baby is born (August 2007). But I think a HUGE reason that a lot of people move away is so they don't have to work both their asses off in order to pay someone else to basically raise their children. I guess I'm a little more old fashioned than I thought I was years ago. But I want one parent, male or female, to stay home with our son. Since my husband is the breadwinner, I will be staying home. And I'm totally happy with that decision.

I guess it just really sucks that it isn't really possible to do that if one of you wants to be home with your son or daughter. (And for those of you who are lucky and can work from home, well you're in a class of your own and I envy you.)

If someone already brought this up, sorry. I only now just joined in and I haven't read all the comments.

I can speak for the DC suburbs; I lived there most of my life. They're all right, until you actually realize what you're missing. But I was friends with easy-to-amuse nerds like me in high school, and they had cars, and we had a fine time until college. Then I realized that I needed my own car to get anywhere entertaining, and that remembering at 11:30 that you needed something from the grocery store means you're more or less out of luck, and that everything closes at 9. When I visit my parents, the suburbs suck. But I'd say it's cause it's harder to be a 20-something in the suburbs than it is to be a kid.

I agree that these people are helping to make the city unaffordable for normal people. I'm poor; where's my apartment, dammit?

"what kind of jobs do they people have making that kind of money? I rather buy a nice size house in the suburbs than pay rent or buy and 2x2 shack in the city."

Both of us have MBAs (mine from Fordham, hers from a school in France). I work in operations, she works in corporate lending. By the time you buy a large house in the burbs and cars and pay for gas and commute, your costs aren't much different than mine, especially if you commute a long distance, in order to get a cheaper house.

"Do you pay someone to watch your kid every day while you work? "

We pay a day care, where he hangs out with and plays with a bunch of other kids every day. He has learned not to be spoiled and how to share because of it. They also have time to teach him lots of things we couldn't do ourselves and a nanny certainly wouldn't. (He can count to 10 in like 5 languages).

"We pay a day care, where he hangs out with and plays with a bunch of other kids every day. He has learned not to be spoiled and how to share because of it. They also have time to teach him lots of things we couldn't do ourselves and a nanny certainly wouldn't. (He can count to 10 in like 5 languages)."

With all due respect, all of that can be done at home, too. It doesn't take a day care to teach a child how to share. And it doesn't take a day care to teach a child to count to 10 in five different languages. It takes a family that isn't lazy and tired.

I am NOT for a second saying that you and your wife are lazy. Not at all. But I know from experience that all those things can be reached if the family takes an active part in their child's life and development.

Sorry, that came out like I was calling you lazy. I'm saying that to all those parents out there who don't have the money to pay for a day care or a nanny.

My husband and I plan on taking Spanish lessons with our son. We plan on joining in with our local community to teach him how to interact with other kids. I really want him to play soccer if he likes it. And I really want him to catch lightning bugs. :] We're really excited about learning these things with our son. I, for one, can't wait to touch up on my Spanish and I really can't wait to learn Chinese.

I just don't want you to think I'm attacking you personally. Not at all.

Part of the reason, for example, suburban schools are so much better than urban ones is that middle class (mostly white) people were able to collectivize and demand for services in a way that, for a variety of reasons (rooted deeply in racism, many would argue), people in poorer neighborhoods weren't able to do. To an extent, it was the point of the suburbs: to develop places close to cities that are better tailored to the economic needs of a newly emerging (at the time) economic class. So you got good public schools but maybe not-so-good public transportation, which was fine because most families had cars -- the services offered matched the needs of the people who used them.

But wealthy urban whites, I find, tend to have a defeatist attitude toward urban public education, preferring to pay for private schools instead of advocating for better public schools. It's somewhat reasonable -- if you can afford an alternative why wouldn't you? And if you do, why would you then waste your time trying to do good for public schools? It does, however, defy the collectivist attitude -- the shared declaration of economic and social needs -- that made the suburbs a success in the first place.

So in response to Siegel and Jackson, the only people who seem to benefit from gentrification and the new wealthy urban class are people who were well off to begin with, and from a purely economic standpoint, actually might have done better in the suburbs (free schooling, tax structure built around the upper class, etc).

On the other hand, poor people are pushed to places that don't have adequate public works (particularly public transportation, which is a big deal if you don't own a car). That these populations remain marginalized in the political process makes it just as difficult to advocate for schools and services in the suburbs as it was in the city. I'm not saying this is worse than the traditional urban/suburban divide, just that it presents new challenges, and the people who have traditionally dealt with those challenges, in a lot of ways, aren't stepping up to the plate.

As a lifestyle, I'm not knocking either one. I grew up in a suburb just outside of Milwaukee, and have lived in DC, Chicago, and now New York -- and love them all for different reasons.

Okay maybe not Chicago. Chicago is pretty weak.

"I am NOT for a second saying that you and your wife are lazy. Not at all. But I know from experience that all those things can be reached if the family takes an active part in their child's life and development."

I understand that you are not. But understand that you see your choices through your perspective and what feels right to you. That's going to color your perspective. I could never leave my kid with a nanny, and when my wife was home with him she was horribly frustrated because she loved her career. You are obviously going to be biased towards what you are most comfortable with.

Remember though, staying home with the kids alone is not necessarily that "old fashioned." The luxury and leisure afforded by modernity has provided you that option. It is an ideal of the 1950s, not the 1850s or earlier. 100s of years ago, kids grew up together because their parents HAD to work, unless they were very rich. People today are far more isolated and selfish across the board, and I personally don't think there is a coincidence.

Plus if you move to the burbs, what about your child's opportunity to see your husband? I can pick my son up and be home by 630 most days, and spend the evening playing with him. If I had to commute to the outer burbs, I'd be lucky to be home by 7 or even later.

I didn't think you were calling me lazy. Honestly, we could afford to have one of us stop working (I make less actually, but damn that glass ceiling), but we feel that him being at a good day program where he is being taught is better for him.

you know, if you can afford a private school, please just send your child there. leave the good public schools open to the middle and lower income new yorkers' whose children also deserve a decent education. ah, but then who would serve starbuck's skim chai teas to all of the depressed, hormone-beaten new moms?

"He can count to 10 in like 5 languages."
Great. It's only about 10 more seconds til I vomit.
It's fine that there's this huge booming group of rich white parents here. But it will STILL take YEARS before the huge numbers of the rest of us are pushed out! Can't you gush about your kid on a website geared toward other self-important parents. Please?
Talking about your kid to the extent that you have is just annoying. I guess it's actually gothamist's fault for posting these types of rich parents vs. working class stories. It's destined to get nasty.

anyone criticizing nyc suburbs in this discussion is an idiot. i say that because this discussion has revolved around issues of ease of access, school options, diversity, etc that is in nyc but not in the suburbs. have any of you ever lived in white plains or larchmont or bronxville? maybe you don't consider them suburbs for some reason? because you can live there, get more land than nyc, more quiet, have a diversity level on par or probably better than national #s, and still walk to the train (30 min to nyc), walk 2 blocks to a grocery store, use public transportation, go to good public schools (that aren't magnets), etc.

how can anyone say nyc suburbs suck compared to others when you are coming from the nyc diverse, cultural background?? other suburbs might have a ridiculous quality of life for the price but they have NONE of the other great stuff that nyc suburbs have

Sorry if I seemed to gush, frankly I don't really think I did, I was talking about an example of what I felt daycare can afford a child, not about mine specifically. I don't think I said anything else about mine being cute or so smart or anything obnoxious. Show me where I've been self-important. I've merely explained why we make the choices we did, without passing judgment on why anyone else subjectively likes their situation. I'm not the dick you want me to be, sorry about that.

I grew up in Maryland, a 5 minute drive from the DC border. I loved it, and I hope that I can move back to a similar environment to raise my children. You get a different perspective on things--instead of getting satisfaction from "what you want, when you want it" which is what Manahattan seems to be all about, you get to enjoy other people in simpler environs. I have a large family and our house, the backyard, the space, everything was HEAVEN (from a kid's perspective)! Granted, we rarely ate out (no need to) so I see little use in the numerous fine restaurants that the city has. Driving is much easier in DC than New York, so cultural attractions remain accessible. But, I think my perspective is LARGELY influenced by the fact that I had lots of siblings, so my parents were more wrapped up in us than their career (different life choices, not necessarily better or worse). I think Manhattan is great to be single in, or for small families, but I couldn't imagine trying to balance a large family with the demands of a city!

Josh: I, too, love my career. More than you can possibly know. But I guess that when it comes down to it, my son's life is going to become more important than my career. You know the saying, when you're on you death bead, do you say, "Man, I wish I had one more day at the office!" Not many folks do, I would guess.

I can always go back to my career. I can't go back and see my son grow up. But, yeah, like you said that's my opinion entirely. Yours is most definitely a different one.

Regarding my husband and his job and seeing his son. He's lucky. He works for a really awesome agency that allows him to work from home from time to time. He also kind of names his hours from time to time, so if he wants, he can leave a little early, work from home every now and again, whatever he needs to do to see his son grow up.

To put it simply, if the BOTH of us aren't working, we can't afford to live here permanently (i.e. own a place) and spend the time with our son we want to spend. So, we're left with no other choice than to move out of Brooklyn when we need to settle down finally. And I'm assuming that we're not alone.

Chicago isn't weak!

Anyway, the one time i visited a new york suburb it was grenwich connecticut. It was absolutely beautiful. Then again it's also the most expensive zip code in the country or something so that doesn't really add anything to this conversation. ;)

I noticed alot of middle class immigrants moving from the city to the suburbs as well as second tier cities like Jersey City, Newark, Paterson, Stamford, New Brunswick etc. I think it is sad that New York will only be for the the super rich and very poor.

Josh, I never said you were a dick, or wanted you to be one. I just said you were nauseating.

And yet the rest implied that I'm that jerk who babbles on incessantly about my kid. Show me what I said that emobodies those admittedly nauseating parents? Did i tell you about his poop habits or riding a bike at 6 months (he doesn't now at 2) or even force you to watch a video of him scratching his butt? No. Nowhere in any of my posts did I gush or do anything of the sort. Rant against obnoxious parents all you want, but I challenge you to find the post where I did anything of the sort. Like I said, the one example you have is when I was talking about what I thought daycare's value was, not my sons.

And yet the rest implied that I'm that jerk who babbles on incessantly about my kid. Show me what I said that emobodies those admittedly nauseating parents? Did i tell you about his poop habits or riding a bike at 6 months (he doesn't now at 2) or even force you to watch a video of him scratching his butt? No. Nowhere in any of my posts did I gush or do anything of the sort. Rant against obnoxious parents all you want, but I challenge you to find the post where I did anything of the sort. Like I said, the one example you have is when I was talking about what I thought daycare's value was, not my sons.

This is great news! Hopefully soon ALL of Manhattan will be white.

Then maybe we can work on getting rid of the homosexuals.

josh, you picked the wrong site for reasonable commentators, just FYI.

every post is followed by:

[1] Jen, this is spelled wrong.

[2] Sharpton! SHARPTON!

[3] NYC is so over!

interspersed with various insults. why? i don't quite know.

pleae don't talk about your kids anymore. BORING. your life if boring. take it to the parenting message boards. BREEDER.

Rich white people. They f*** up everything. Trust me, I'm from that tribe.

Well, the white part, anyway.

Siegel makes a fair point. I remember hearing Pete Hamill say once that he stopped worrying about the future of New York when he saw people deciding to live here in the city for the rest of their lives (including, one can assume, their childbearing years).

Here's what I say, though: if you grew up here or moved here and decided you didn't want to leave here just because you decided to spawn, then that's one thing. A good thing. Get involved with the schools, do positive things. Great. What I would say to the rest of you is this... don't expect the city to be like the 'burbs, or wherever you're from. Because you will discover fast that the city looks different when you are a parent in it. You can adjust to it, like most parents I know did and like my wife and I did, or you can try to bend it to what you need, in which case let me be the first to say, get the f*** out. We like it just the way it is (or maybe was). You have to decide: if the great things about raising a kid in NYC (diversity, easy access to museums and other cultural treasures, learning self-reliance and getting around without a car) aren't as important to you as having a Baby Gap close by, or having plenty of room for your supersize McClaren or getting everywhere by car, then I would say Westchester's that way.

PS: And guys, let's can the value judgments over SAH moms vs. pre-K and day care. For the vast majority of parents I know, the decision is a very difficult one, one more driven by economic imperatives rather than what's in one's heart. Anyone who thinks they are a better parent because they chose one or the other doesn't know dick about parenting, IMHO. Let's leave the high falutin' value judgements in the suburbs, too.

Tim:

Amen.

Amen.

and

Amen. (I hope it was just clear I was explaining why I like daycare for me, not anyone else)

"You have to decide: if the great things about raising a kid in NYC (diversity, easy access to museums and other cultural treasures, learning self-reliance and getting around without a car)."

I do not deny that most affluent NYC suburbs are lily-white. I do, however, chuckle when people who live in affluent, lily-white n'hoods in the city and would sooner die than send their children to school with the rabble crow about diversity in NYC.

Tim N., I'm NOT putting you in this category - I don't know where you live and don't presume that you're white or anything like that. Your point's well-taken, but I do think a lot of people are pretty hypocritical when it comes to diversity.

"having a Baby Gap close by, or having plenty of room for your supersize McClaren or getting everywhere by car, then I would say Westchester's that way"

Now, now - the suburbs have more to offer than that. They're not just a place for superficial sheep who can't handle the city. Westchester simply has more to offer for people who want space, a backyard, safe streets for the children to walk down and play near, good public schools, quiet environs, etc. I'm sure this seems pedestrian to city people, but lots of perfectly sane, intelligent people make this tradeoff all the time.

[14] Posted by: wee takum over | March 23, 2007 11:04 AM...define Ghetto...Jewish? People of Color? You define the phrase :There goes the neighborhood"

OMG -- people in new york city have MUHNEY?!

TIM: “PS: And guys, let's can the value judgments over SAH moms vs. pre-K and day care”

Since I was the only one who brought that up (from what I can tell) I feel I need to respond especially since my point was apparently not understood. I never said one was better than the other. The point that I was trying to make was that it's a depressing reality that a family with one working spouse can make a decent amount of money (especially when you look at national incomes) and still cannot afford to live IN THE CITY comfortably. And when I say comfortably, I mean, buy a house/apt for less than 600+ thousand dollars, get a kid into a decent school (even the public schools are filled much of the time. I know a family recently who wasn't able to get their kids into the PUBLIC school in their very own neighborhood. Tell me how that's reasonable? Something is very wrong with that situation if you ask me.) It wasn't always like this. This city wasn't always like this. Only recently has it become so unbelievably expensive. For those who are still renting and desperately trying to make ends meet all the while saving up for an exorbitantly high down payment it’s a frustrating battle at best a losing one at worst.

The middle class New Yorker has to decide if it's worth it, is it worth both parents working their asses off in order to make enough money to send their kids to day care, hire a nanny, whatever? Or does it make more sense to move outside the city, have one person stay home, get a bigger place, have a yard, and commute into work every day. (Tim, you said SAH Mom. With all due respect, I know a lot of fathers who are staying home while the moms head to work. I know you probably wrote that out of habit, but I feel the need to call you out on it.)

My point was/is it's frustrating that it's come down to this.

And using the good old "get the f*ck out!* response to those of us who DO really love this city but are finding it harder and harder to make ends meet in order to stay here, well, that's just annoying. A lot of us are hardworking citizens who would love to make a difference in his or her local communities. But doing so is becoming harder and harder to do.

I can't believe that parents/breeders are getting as vilified as the much loathed Billyburg hipsters.

Oh, and one more thing, I harbor no animosity for those who can afford to stay here and raise a family, buy a house, etc. A little envy? Perhaps, but not hatred. It's only myself and my own situation I'm frustrated with. And New York City and all its people is the way it is; it gets over stuff quickly. Our being pushed out won't matter to most of the folks who live here, the city won't bat an eye. Our apartment will be occupied within days. And that's the most frustrating part about living here. You can give, give, give! And work your ass off to live here, and still at the end of the day the city couldn't give a shit whether you were here or not.

It feels like an abusive relationship. You want to stay with me? Fine, I have a lot to offer if you work for it. But I ain't lifting a finger to help you back.

Nothing wrong with wealthy little white kids.

They're not perfect, but at least they'll be less likely to mug or murder you when they grow up.

I didn't see any rich white kids marauding through the Union Square Green Market. They're home abusing their parents' prescription meds.

And what's wrong with that?

Let's hear it for the white folks who raise their kids in Manhattan!

???????????????????????????????????????????????????

user-pic

It's interesting that the author of this post equates moving from the city to the suburbs as "waving the white flag." Having grown up in Queens in the '80s, I'm of the generation that views such a move as a sign of success and progress. To each his own, of course, but it's a little snooty to say that people who choose to live in the suburbs and raise their kids there are somehow inferior because they prefer the suburbs.

user-pic

Yeah, I don't get what's wrong with moving to Tarrytown, Hastings, wherever etc etc. Pretty nice places, if you ask me.

If you want to learn how to twist balloons, I have balloon animal videos on my site www.balloon-animals.com

So what's new? From the Upper East Side trophy wives with their multiple births; to the UWS wanna-be liberal mommies with their one perfect superchild, the city's crawling with entitled toddlers. Sad thing is, I couldn't have a kid if I wanted to. I'm way too poor to support one, but I'm just above the poverty line, so I can't get gov't. support. I need to live in NYC - there's no work in my field outside of the city. Stuck.

I didn't see any rich white kids marauding through the Union Square Green Market. They're home abusing their parents' prescription meds.

---and then, they grow up to work for some type of Bush II White House and screw peoples lives in other ways i.e.fostering shortsighted domestic and foreign policy initiatives.

1. Unless I marry a trust funder, go back to school for an MBA or law degree, get knocked up by some wealthy celebrity or Angelina Jolie decides to adopt me, I won't be having children in NY.

And that's okay....I'm smart enough to figure out how to provide enriching, empowering experiences for my children regardless of geography.


Mmm-hmm. NYT does it again with its hard-hitting breaking news. I'm so glad this article was written, because before Friday, I had no idea rich white people lived in Manhattan. Of course, if you go to UES during the daytime, the only white folk you'll see will be the toddlers, thanks to their parents leaving their little trophies with the hired help, most of whom don't seem to be white. Hooray for perpetuating stereotypes, rich white parents!

user-pic

Not suprising seems like every single pasty-face in Brooklyn is pushing out a rug-rat.

Wasn't meaning to single anyone out. Just that IMHO the conversation seemed to be taking on a tone that had a bad vibe to it.

(God, you can tell that these posts are written by a bunch of parents, we all lash out because we're fried and then we remember that we have to set a good example and we pull back. What the hell. Rock on. Parenting isn't for wusses.)

City parents all seem to know what it's like, and therefore are more compassionate to each other, because generally we're all in the same boat. But when I travel out of the city to the 'burbs, I have to watch what I say, because the minute it comes out that we put our daughter in day care and pre-K (and mind you, she's ten now!) we get the "bad parent glare." That is why I say that the pre-K vs SAH argument is usually found in the 'burbs... at least that's my experience... because the economic issues of living in a city usually make the decisions for the parents. I've found that it's one of the nastier imports from the 'burbs, along with SUVs and a weird sense of entitlement.

Oh, and BTW, I've lived and worked in the NYC burbs (yes, Mahopac, White Plains, Rye, some town in Rockland, too) and I'm here to tell you, they do suck. They really do. That's why we don't want the city to turn into them. So I stand by my "get the f*** out" comment.

However, mihow, you are absolutely right, I should have said SAH parents, I do know dads who stay home as well. Because the bottom line in parenting is this: whatever works. That's why as long as there wasn't an abuse situation, I vowed that I'd never criticize another parent. I would just expect the same consideration from the general population (not from you in particular).

#18 is right. Negroes are getting pushed out onto the train tracks, the streets, and stealing from your house.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

years of isiah thomas stories in chant form http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/college/2009/11/14/20
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS