The NY Times has a glimmering review of Frank Gehry’s first New York structure to actually get built. Architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff calls the IAC building, the headquarters for Barry Diller's media empire, “elegant” and “a much-needed touch of lightness” to the city’s skyline. Gehry’s latest, writes Ouroussoff, reflects how developers are paying closer attention to design.
Boasting “strangely chiseled forms that reflect the surrounding sky,” the IAC, one of several new towers along the West Side Highway, features more symmetrical forms to the north and more blocky ones to the south, he writes.
Here's more on the exterior:
The sail-like curves of the west façade seem to be braced against the roar of passing cars. The blockier forms in back lock the composition into the lower brick buildings that extend to the east.Ouroussoff praises the interior, with its “smooth, uniform” lobby entries and the windows’ “horizontal, fritted white bands,” prefabricated panels and aluminum frames. He calls the 10-story staircase at the back of the building – the one that overlooks the Empire State Building – possibly “the most gorgeous service staircase anywhere in New York” but adds this parenthetical gem: “It has now been painted various shades of yellow, however, dulling the effect.”
There’s one feature Ouroussoff doesn’t like: the “bloodless” two-story atrium with stiff and flat glass partitions and a curbed staircase made of tigerwood and brushed stainless steel handrails, which “may qualify as the most blandly corporate space Mr. Gehry has created."
Okay, maybe two. Ouroussoff also blasts the sixth-floor corporate terrace for its messy geometry.
Joints don’t line up perfectly; corner look hurriedly patched together. At certain points the unusual curvature of a window, created by the building’s odd geometry, makes it impossible to span the opening with a single piece of glass, and the additional mullion creates an odd, patchwork pattern.
We need to see Gehry's building firsthand to make an assessment, but we wonder whether it merits the use of the words "odd" or "oddly" four times in one review.
For analysis of Gehry in New York and more on IAC, read New Yorker architecture critic Paul Goldberger's "Gehry-Rigged."
Photograph of the IAC Building by ranjit on Flickr




I work across the street from that building and think its a total eyesore. I used to have such beautiful views of the river and the statue of liberty...
Doesn't the Conde Nast cafeteria count as his first New York structure?
mt:
a cafeteria is a room, not a building. for that matter, he also designed the issey miyake store in tribeca – but that isn't a building either.
I call shenanigans on that picture. I've gone by that structure numerous times and it has never reflected the sky in such a manner from my vantage point. Maybe I need to be a foot away from it and looking directly up the side of the building.
This is what it looks like to 99.9% of the world:
www.flickr.com/photos/kmikeym/249742509/
(not my photo)
Those frosted, two-tone windows and the shape of the building make it look like a sno-cone factory.
Or maybe Gehry wanted it to look like Mt. Everest.
img.alibaba.com/photo/11441469/Everest_Trek.jpg
I've never been a fan of this building (or of Gehry's work in general). I think the IAC/NY building looks like a silvery/light blue permutation of a nuclear reactor.
oh iac building, how i love working inside of you.
When this POS gets torn down, there will be much rejoicing. Buildings should be in harmony with their surroundings, something Ghery seems not to get. Most of his buildings look like they belong in someplace like Willets Point - filled with junk yards. This crumpled monstrosity would fit in perfectly.
wow. gothamist commenters don't like modern architecture...what a shocker.
You guys complain about how all the building look the same and how the city is going to turn it a giant mall... blah blah blah. Here's a building that doesn't look the same, it gets people talking, it's very unique and you still complain.
"wow. gothamist commenters don't like shitty deconstructivist architecture...what a shocker."
There. Fixed it for you.
In any case, Gothamist commentators are in good company:
www.lrb.co.uk/v23/n16/fost01_.html
"modern architecture"
I don't think you know what that means.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_architecture
Looks like cheap crap in person, which fits in just perfectly with 99% of the crap built in this city in the past 5 years. Of course, it could always be worse; note almost any condo project popping up in williamsburg.
Honestly, it wouldn't be so bad if it didn't have that crappy snow-glass on it. As it is, the building is an eyesore. I give them 15 years utnil they rip off the glass and put something else on. Let's pray it turns out to be sooner.
where ist the building located?
thx
it's on the west side highway in the upper teens or low twenties. it looks like a piece of shit--sno cone is right--the photos in the times article are a complete misrepresentation. if it didn't have gehry's name attached to it, it would be universally ridiculed.
also, why is this post just a book report of the times article? shouldn't y'all have taken a look for yourself before this regurgitation?
"Buildings should be in harmony with their surroundings."
This contextual argument fails if the surrounding area is blighted. In such a case, context should be fully ignored.