<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Opinionist: Jack Goes Boating</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php</link>
<description>All comments for Opinionist: Jack Goes Boating</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Ken</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1052574</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1052574</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:36:05 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. Did the reviewer watch the same play that I did?  Here are some hints: 

The &quot;central&quot; &quot;crisis&quot; or the play is &quot;not&quot; the &quot;cooking scene&quot; no matter how many unnecessary quotation marks you use.  The central relationship is Clyde-Lucy, not Jack-Connie.  And it&apos;s not driven by the kind of protagonist-overcomes-obstacles-to-achieve-goal plot that you seem to want (rent &quot;Bad News Bears.&quot;)  

It&apos;s a funny, charming play about the ways in which people are fucked up -- think &quot;Who&apos;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?&quot;  The performances were endearing, and the I though the design was clever without being pointlessly too-clever.  

Sorry it wasn&apos;t bleak enough to be downtown-cool.  I thought it was great.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jess L</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1044395</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1044395</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:57:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i don&apos;t know what your talking about, the play was wonderful and touching.  It was sweet and ssooo lovely in a total un-hollywood bullshit way.  It was real, yo.  I wasn&apos;t bored, it&apos;s a matter of having a watchful ear and eye for the details in the preformances and the superb, superb dialogue.  Glaudini&apos;s script has a sense of humor true to much of the subway talk overheard in ny.  I loved it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Brooklyn Book Worm</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1042673</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/18/opinionist_jack.php#comment-1042673</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:36:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This posting accurately describes the play, but fails to note the excruciating boredom it engenders. Or as a friend put it, &quot;An amazing amount of time and talent has been given to a story in which the dog does not bark, with no significance at all.&quot; 

The play lacks any sort of dramatic tension -- the stuff that makes you wondering what will come next -- and depends on an exceptional cast to add depth to the four characters. Hoffman and Ortiz are amazing, as noted, and the women are terrific, too: Beth Cole rises the the challenge of making &quot;ordinary&quot; interesting and Daphne Ruben-Vega is constitutionally incapable of giving a boring performance; the stage lights up every time she appears. The cast boasts an impressive array of awards and nominations, all richly deserved.

This is a production of the LAByrinth Theatre Company, founded by Ortiz and Hoffman as a &quot;multi-cultural collective&quot; dedicated to &quot;reflecting the many voices of our New York community.&quot; Given this political agenda, the play was apparently chosen to &quot;give voice&quot; to blue-collar New Yorkers. But all it shows (as in the photo above) is why they need a giant hookah to find any pleasure in life. The audience is not offered a toke, alas and alack.

P.S. to the litearal minded: a sign and the scent makes it clear that legal herbal cigarattes are smoked, not cannabis sativa.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>