<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: &quot;Injuries&quot; From Coney Island Redevelopment </title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/11/injuries_from_c.php</link>
<description>All comments for &quot;Injuries&quot; From Coney Island Redevelopment </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>rentar</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/11/injuries_from_c.php#comment-1032892</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/11/injuries_from_c.php#comment-1032892</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:43:37 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What is there, besides the boardwalk, that draws people to Coney Island? Nathan&apos;s? Surely some visitors want to eat the nostalgia dogs at Nathan&apos;s. A few go to Ruby&apos;s. A few to the go-karts, the batting cages and the amusement areas. The Cyclone. Sure.

But taking the kids for a day of Coney Island amusement park rides costs more than a day at Disneyland or any other park you can name.

Why should New Yorkers lose out and pay more for less? A new revitalized fun area is what everyone wants even though a few people with connections to the pre-1960s Coney Island claim otherwise.

The chief attraction -- the boardwalk itself -- won&apos;t disappear when the area leaps from the 1950s to 2007, 08, or 09. But rebuilding the area will scrape the cheesiness from the area.

As it is today, Coney doesn&apos;t bask in seedy charm. It&apos;s simply caked with tastelessness and tawdriness. 

If seedy charm were part of its character, the Shore Hotel across from Nathan&apos;s would enjoy a steady stream of beach-going families spending a night or two near the water. Instead, it&apos;s closed and locked down, the way it&apos;s been for a very long time. 

Most of the shops on Surf Avenue are run-down and desperate for an industrial-strength cleaning followed by a lot of fresh paint. They&apos;re not exuding seedy charm. They&apos;re dirty and mismanaged.

The old Coney Island is gone. Mainly it&apos;s gone because the amusement business changed to satisfy the demands of the crowds. The millions who went to the old Coney died or moved away. A handful of diehards, wishful dreamers and dwellers-in-the-past pray it isn&apos;t so. But it is. 

On the other hand, human nature hasn&apos;t changed. Not a bit. That&apos;s why the simplest and most accessible aspects of Coney Island -- the boardwalk and the beach -- will continue to draw crowds.

My only worry about Coney&apos;s future arises when I wonder if it will attain such popularity that a Jersey state of mind will arrive, leading to the charging of admission to sit on the sand. Nah. Won&apos;t happen.

  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BODYGUARDS</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/11/injuries_from_c.php#comment-1032698</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/11/injuries_from_c.php#comment-1032698</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:34:12 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The One half square block / three story brick - Surf Movie Theatre building has been lying unused for DECADES, on the busy corners of Surf and Stillwell - overlooking both Nathan&apos;s and the busy Elevated Stillwell train Station.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>