<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Is The Splasher Really American Apparel?</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is The Splasher Really American Apparel?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>upso</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1042647</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1042647</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:58:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hmm.. see, after reading this, and thinking about the ad a bit
i suspect the person that made this particular flyer is saying
&quot;dude, don&apos;t splash art, splash these shitty american apparel ads&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>betty harris</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1037585</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1037585</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:07:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;if the splasher is american apparel, why would they only post over the buffed pieces on north 6th and none of the other splasher hits around nyc?

also, whenever the splasher hits faile&apos;s own building on north 6th street, faile takes the liberty of removing it within a day. yet the so-called american apparel ad has stayed up on faile&apos;s OWN building for over a week.

hmmm. maybe someone should go ask failure what he thinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>me</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026268</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026268</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:45:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&apos;t it more possible that AA is just stating their opinion about this manafesto by trashing it in their add and not hiding out like the splasher?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>macco</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026253</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026253</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:27:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;AA:

1) union busters
2) misogynist ads
3) creepy. am i wrong?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>parsnip_lee</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026240</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026240</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:08:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;why is AA lower than dogshit may I ask?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>macco</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026207</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026207</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:37:48 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;um, that is just obviously such a baiting lie. i mean, american apparel is lower than dogshit, don&apos;t get me wrong, but i don&apos;t think there&apos;s anyway this can be construed as an AA ad. why would aa suggest that their own ads should splashed? why would the splasher splash their own manifesto? anyway, people are so dumb.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>occam</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026191</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026191</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:17:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;an acquaintance of mine is one of the splashers -- he told me he was contacted a few weeks back by american apparel&apos;s marketing dept. about sponsorships... he said he didn&apos;t take it but i guess he changed his mind...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>deer</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026141</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026141</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:17:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;people, seriously. it says &quot;try this&quot; and suggests that the splasher go splash an AA ad. 

CW got the point:

Or even MORE likely, whoever is putting these posters up is not the Splasher but is trying to say to the Splasher, &quot;try this&quot; as in encouraging them to Splash American Apparel ads rather than street art.

[2] Posted by: CW | March 5, 2007 9:53 AM

i promise.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>c_vorbeck</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026118</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026118</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:44:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;any post with a mike tyson clip is a keeper.  brilliant, tien!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>cheep schmatas</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026111</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026111</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:33:47 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t buy no cheap jew clothes.
same goes for that other crap comp, free kuntry.
don&apos;t buy crap clothes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>art dude</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026098</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026098</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:13:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I could splash this blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lazer</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026089</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026089</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:59:51 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;See this is why all this new bullshit street art sucks. Real graffiti artists, who carry spray cans and not stupid drawings and buckets of glue, would have handled the splasher problem a long time ago. We would have waited, set him up and beat his teeth out of his face for essentially crossing us out. Why don’t you capitalist art school failures team up and take care of the problem before mommies and daddies money runs out and you cannot make your bullshit art anymore. Also, quit giving the splashier so much attention, your only fueling his cause.    &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lazer</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026086</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026086</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:57:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;See this is why all this new bullshit street art sucks. Real graffiti artists, who carry spray cans and not stupid drawings and buckets of glue, would have handled the splasher problem a long time ago. We would have waited, set him up and beat his teeth out of his face for essentially crossing us out. Why don’t you capitalist art school failures team up and take care of the problem before mommies and daddies money runs out and you cannot make your bullshit art anymore. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dumber</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026078</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026078</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:46:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stop already with the Splasher crap.  Please.  Stop. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>calm down</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026073</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026073</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:35:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeez, people. Do you believe EVERYTHING you read on the internet?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mdowning</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026071</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026071</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:30:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;if it is AA, may the same treatment be dealt to their stores, their product inside the stores, and anyone who tries to stop the returned favor.  if it is AA, and it&apos;s quite possible, it&apos;s really unfortunate that they&apos;re such whores for attention that they&apos;d destroy some nice works.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>cp</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026068</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026068</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:24:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;man, if AA is the splasher, than that is ONE MORE reason to never shop there. Ruin art in the name of publicity and profit? fuck that. They already keep me OUT of their stores from their pseudo porno photo shoot advertising on the walls and in the dressing rooms, and this is just the last straw. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026067</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026067</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:15:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How would American Apparel benefit from the publicity in the Times when no one would have known at the time that it was AA behind it?
(I don&apos;t buy it by the way, too much at stake for AA) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CW</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026059</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026059</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:53:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Or even MORE likely, whoever is putting these posters up is not the Splasher but is trying to say to the Splasher, &quot;try this&quot; as in encouraging them to Splash American Apparel ads rather than street art.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Devin</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026056</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/03/05/is_the_splasher.php#comment-1026056</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:39:44 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;uhhh.... OR... WAY more likely- American Apparel sees controversial hipster art grafitti related news happening directly to it&apos;s own demographic, and decides to quickly capiltalize on the news by tying it into a new marketing campaign in order to get some free press out of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>