<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Staten Island May Be Bad for Your Health</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php</link>
<description>All comments for Staten Island May Be Bad for Your Health</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Audrey Silk</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017365</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017365</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:15:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is nothing more than the NYC DOH&apos;s obsession with demonizing smoking at every chance. Did it ever occur to anyone repeating what amounts to nothing more than a guess that this is a count easily conducted?  As in, question family about the smoking habits of those that died from the flu or pneumonia.  So ask yourself why they didn&apos;t do that or produce a number if they did.  Then consider this if we want to assume smokers account for a number of dead... a higher rate of smokers in SI means a higher rate of people forced out into the cold to enjoy their cigarette where... what?... they can catch their death of cold.  I say we blame the NYC DOH&apos;s smoking BAN for the higher number of deaths.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kojak</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017260</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017260</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:56:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not really their fault. 

Its that they&apos;re too close to New Jersey.   &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MT</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017041</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017041</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:28:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d like to point out that if you have ever gone to a Mets&apos; game you have sat directly on top of a landfill for nine innings. They are everywhere in the city. Staten Island just has the most recent one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Oscar T. G.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017015</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017015</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:55:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Living on a landfill

oh yeah that is perfectly healthy&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>new jersey's ok, though?</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017008</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1017008</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;congrats for not bashing any of the boroughs, but i&apos;ll be more impressed if a week goes by without any unneccesary sarcasm directed towards the garden state.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>cc</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1016999</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/20/staten_island_m.php#comment-1016999</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:41:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What do you mean, &quot;MAY be&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>