<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: &quot;Clip/Stamp/Fold&quot; Recalls Old-School Design</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/08/clipstampfold_r.php</link>
<description>All comments for &quot;Clip/Stamp/Fold&quot; Recalls Old-School Design</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 design_jill</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jpriluck@earthlink.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jpriluck@earthlink.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>gideon</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/08/clipstampfold_r.php#comment-1006978</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2007/02/08/clipstampfold_r.php#comment-1006978</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:44:40 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Plus, it was weird how Ouroussoff focused on computer technology as the culprit for the currently slick/corporate situation.  I was wondering why he didn&apos;t mention any contemporary design journals (they feel generally promotional and advertising-driven) and/or analyze the lack of critical printed journals.  Any underground design publishers out there?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>