Gothamist: Wednesday Food News: Early Edition

huh?

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:15:37 -0500

Not being familiar with Eater's rating system, it wasn't clear. Sounds like you guys are. But reading Gothamist, it wasn't all that clear. You're acting as if I'm the first person to complain about Gothamist's writing quality!

huh? is dumb

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:17 -0500

Sounds like "huh?" needs to spend time working on his/her reading comprehension skills instead of attacking writers.

anomalous

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:29:31 -0500

In this case I think the confusion is with Eater. They put odds on the stars but often don't choose their best bet.

BDT

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:27:15 -0500

To be fair, it is Eater that makes it complicated. They post logical odds and then bet emotionally against themselves.

huh?

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:59:28 -0500

"And Eater puts their money on two stars this week, but their own bet on three." What does this sentence even mean? That Eater did or didn't get it right? Why can't any of the Gothamist writers, um, write?

AP Style

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:06:28 -0500

Super Bowl. Two words. Capital letters.