<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: A Victory for Affordable Housing</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php</link>
<description>All comments for A Victory for Affordable Housing</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Blike Moomberg</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-845297</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-845297</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:42:56 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How about NO subsidies for luxury developers, period? Why should we pay for something that we can&apos;t use? The poor pay little taxes, the rich don&apos;t carry as much of the tax burden, compared to the middle class. The middle class takes the brunt of the taxes, but are too &quot;rich&quot; to be eligible to live in the very housing that their taxes paid for.

Oh wait, we like this scheme. That&apos;s why we re-elected Bloomberg with our eyes wide open. Bloomberg used this very same nonsense scheme for many projects over the past few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Perry</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-845173</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-845173</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:54:25 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The whole way that housing affordability is addressed is so skewed its ridiculous.  People need to step back and realize a simple rule.  

The price of something is highly related to the cost of something.   Developers don&apos;t build luxury housing because thats their favorite thing (even if it might be), they do it because its the only thing that you can build in this city and earn a return on your investment.  

I know its out of the grasp for most non-developers to try to do, but pencil out how much it would cost you to buy a piece of land, spend upwards of $175-200 per square foot in construction and labor costs, and also pay for financing and interest costs in order to wait the multiple years it takes to get approvals for most any kind of project, then pay for the construction and permanent financing fees.  

You literally can not make it work in many cases. Anywhere it does work you realize things like - &quot;Wow, I need to sell these one bedroom apartments for half a mil a piece to many any money at all!&quot;

The people in power, if they actually cared about housing affordability for all of us, would find ways to actually reduce the cost of building, so that people that actually do it can get it done at a cheaper price.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Michael</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844963</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844963</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:14:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Prediction: This will lead to less housing being built overall and less affordable housing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>anomalous</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844785</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844785</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:11:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;moxie, go to the NYC Affordable Housing Resource Center website.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ugh</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844728</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844728</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:31:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;so a family of four making 60K is on their own
yeah, way to help the &quot;middle class&quot;

this only shows that politicians only care about the rich and poor&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>LIRC</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844679</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844679</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:49:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;no more than 80%? of household income? That does not sound right, or affordable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>good luck</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844662</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844662</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:38:37 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In typical fashion the income cutoff will probably be too low for the truly middle class.  Politicians think you&apos;re rich if you make a dime above the median.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>moxie</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844638</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/12/21/a_victory_for_a.php#comment-844638</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:24:40 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&apos;s my question:  How does one get in on these fabulously affordable apartments in the new buildings?  Is there a good way of finding out about these buildings when they&apos;re under construction?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>