Gothamist: New York Critics Get Rated

Sissy Hankshaw

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:47:51 -0500

I think the picture looks just fine.

Beth

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:09:20 -0500

Sasha Frere-Jones write for the New Yorker, NOT the Times

Lilitu

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:50:07 -0500

That picture creeps me the hell out.

edEx

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:46:38 -0500

with the exception of the cover (only as of recent) TONY should be ashamed with the design of the that magazine. The Original, London, has always had a better design standpoint and London uses better paper as well. I use TONY to start fires in my fireplace.

pugsley

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:44:46 -0500

Any survey that leaves out Rex Reed is worthless. Although I often don't agree with some of his choices Rex delivers the most imaginative and catty reviews of anyone in NYC. Down with TONY, Long Live Rex

bklynd

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:20:43 -0500

It's a nice idea and entertaining reading, but some decent critics were attacked by haters. If you look on the TONY website, you'll see that the voters are people in the various industries, many of whom undoubtedly have scores to settle.

_^^_

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:11:58 -0500

sylvester should have recieved an award for not only killing his own career with an opportunity that could have propelled it, but also for being a big part of the blow that turned the village voice into the pile it is now.