<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Is Columbia Too Sexy?</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php</link>
<description>All comments for Is Columbia Too Sexy?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 design_jill</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jpriluck@earthlink.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jpriluck@earthlink.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Publius</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-747047</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-747047</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:39:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The arrangements with DASNY aren&apos;t even like government maintaining streets.  The only involvement the state Dormitory Authority has is to make its Aaa rating available to the institution.  Columbia is responsible for repaying interest and principal on the bonds, not DASNY.

Overall, that&apos;s the kind of great reporting work that reminds me why I never read the Daily News.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>LM</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-746683</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-746683</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:40:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s Fox News video on the subject: http://www.foxnews.com/video2/launchPage.html?112806/112806_bs_coulter&amp;Ivy%20Gone%20Wild%21&amp;Big_Story&amp;Report%3A%20S%26M%20parties%2C%20x-rated%20romps%20and%20nude%20parties%20occurring%20at%20Columbia%20University&amp;US&amp;-1&amp;Ivy%20Gone%20Wild%21&amp;Video%20Launch%20Page&amp;News%20&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hot</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745659</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745659</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:05:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Damn. I need to get laid by some college girls. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>just saying</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745540</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745540</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:55:42 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yup.  Gothamist is right. Columbia is way too sexy for its students.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jackson</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745527</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745527</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:51:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, sexual hijinks and sophomoric antics? They almost make columbia sound like college. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tim N.  </title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745266</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745266</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:14:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Damn, I miss college.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dhex</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745163</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745163</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:25:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;lede is the correct spelling in that context. anachronistic, sure, but what isn&apos;t these days?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>wanker</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745040</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745040</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:34:23 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;not unless we&apos;re all easily confused printers

I keep coming across a word that doesn&apos;t make it into the dictionary. It is very specific to the journalism world and dates back to earlier days of newspaper publishing. The word is lede, and it refers to the opening lines of a newspaper article, also called the &quot;lead.&quot; It is used in alerting the printer to them but distinguishes them from the word &quot;lead&quot; (Pb), since that metal was used in the printing of the ink.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>t</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745023</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745023</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:27:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;actually, spelly.  &quot;lede&quot; is correct when it comes to the first line of a newspaper article.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spelly d</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745009</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-745009</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:23:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;that&apos;s because the co-founders of gothamist went to columbia...

and yet they still gave us this gem:

Over the weekend, the Daily News had a story with the following lede: 

another seed change, perhaps&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>laf</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744931</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744931</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:42:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;deja vu:
that&apos;s because the co-founders of gothamist went to columbia...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gawker beat you to it, and didn&apos;t use the royal &quot;our.&quot;
[1] Posted by: deja vu | November 28, 2006 1:38 PM &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rufus</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744889</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744889</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:22:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;At night people just go back to their rooms and ... heat up a hot pocket&quot; 

If that&apos;s not a sexual euphemism I don&apos;t know what is. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Barnyard</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744836</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744836</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:57:35 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Barnard Jokes
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>waefawef</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744834</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744834</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:56:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s a good sell for Columbia - the school where piles of pasty, flabby nerds get their shit off. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Yeahhh</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744831</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744831</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:55:42 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This guy also penned some articles a while back criticizing Columbia as being anti-semitic for the controversy in the Middle Eastern Dept. He has some obvious vendetta against the school. Seriously, I know only one or two people who have even been to one of these naked parties (I&apos;m a Columbia senior) and I promise you there are very few overly-sexed people on this campus. Have you seen how ugly we are??? 

That argument about dorm funds applies to any school and is probably the funniest argument I&apos;ve seen in a while. That&apos;s like saying our tax dollars contribute to drug trafficking because we pay the taxes that fund the roads that support the cars that support the drug dealers. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>brooklynbee</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744815</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744815</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:50:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody going to make a joke about Barnard women? Anyone?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>brooklynbee</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744810</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744810</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody going to make a joke about Barnard women? Anyone?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>deja vu</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744778</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/28/is_columbia_too.php#comment-744778</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:38:31 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gawker beat you to it, and didn&apos;t use the royal &quot;our.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>