Think twice

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:17:33 -0500

Having the private sector sponsor the maintenance of subway stations is what the MTA should have pursued decades ago. I used to take 47-50 St/Rockefeller Center every day and loved how the outer mezzanine was all decked out in classic, pristine Rockefeller-Center-style Art-Deco with shops, banks, security, a zealous cleaning crew, and tony architecture & signage. All well maintained 'cause it was Rockefeller Center's responsibility (and it had a reputation to maintain), but once you went through the turnstiles...blech. The interior mezzanine and platform was everything we've come to expect from the MTA. Grimy floors, peeling paint, falling tile, et cetera. But hey, the original, untouched IND system architecture still retained the charm & warmth of a detention center, psych ward, or housing project. The stark contrast between the interior and exterior mezzanine symbolized (for me at least) the difference between public and private entities. The IND subway system was a socialist endeavor and its stations are pragmatic and utilitarian in design. While Rockefeller Center, a temple to capitalism, is lavish and glamorous in design. That station's namesake and the companies in its vicinity should definitely be chipping in its upkeep. Rockefeller Center 's been getting free publicity ever since 47-50 St Station was built. Rockefeller Center should give its visitors a seamless experience; from the train doors all the way up to the ice-skating rink or else the MTA will strike Rockefeller Center's name off of the station name, likewise with the future CitiField. It's only fair.

Kevin Walsh

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:36:36 -0500

Maybe they can pay the scratchiti clowns to carve the logos on the windows. www.forgotten-ny.com

Gothamist: MTA Wants Some Citi Money

Think twice

Kevin Walsh