<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: New R160 Trains Good to Stay on N and Q Lines</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php</link>
<description>All comments for New R160 Trains Good to Stay on N and Q Lines</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 design_jill</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jpriluck@earthlink.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jpriluck@earthlink.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>ccork</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-1032411</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-1032411</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:06:23 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;why  r-142&apos;s  to   #7  line  and why plan  the  change&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>HI</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-743415</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-743415</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:26:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The old train such as on the B lines, i take that to school every morning, runs faster (and is older) then the Q train fleets.. The B trains are just more tough and strong oppsed to the R 63 fleet if im not mistaken.
The R40 has great AC(B J M etc) and a strong movement&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Not Amused</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-703243</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-703243</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:00:09 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well I guess this is a good thing . The {N},&amp;{Q} trains use some of the oldest cars in the fleet . I agree with the above posts concerning the station improvements . This is something that needs upgrading as well. It gives the MTA the chance to get rid of those older trains currently inuse along the {C},{E}, {B},{J},{M}, &amp;{Z} lines . So quit complaining .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>andrew</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-698552</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-698552</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:45:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;seriously.  I think the MTA&apos;s money would be better spent on station rennovations and infrastructure improvements.  

The new cars are really quite nice and all, but are the old ones *really* that bad?  Many stations on the other hand, are absolutely disgusting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>crybaby</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-698145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/11/18/new_n_and_q_tra.php#comment-698145</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:39:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i love those old R/W cars -- great colors, wide aisle, smooth ride.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>