Parents and critics are railing against various research projects at schools, studies which were approved by the Department of Education. While children are included in the studies with parental consent, the Post reports that there are "'modest cash payments' to parents and teachers and gift certificates for kids," leading one parent to say, "We have a laboratory of guinea pigs. The Department of Education markets our kids like they're a piece of meat."
The Post described one study in detail:
Maria Kromidas of Columbia Teachers College is doing a project about "Children and Race in New York City" by observing kids in a Queens elementary school with a largely immigrant student base. She wants to find out how children of different races get along.While it's unclear whether there's harm in having an researcher speak to students, the studies do seem interesting and valid. How else will educators learn about students' patterns of behavior and perceptions?A previous study Kromidas conducted with fourth-graders at PS 214 in Brooklyn following 9/11 found South Asian immigrants were subjected to vicious racism by Latino and black classmates.
Kromidas, a former teacher at the school, found that kids linked people from Bangladesh with terror.
"The bulk of the responses from the non-Muslim students were frightening to me," Kromidas wrote in the study.
She questions students during "everyday activities" and lets them "take the conversation wherever they wish to go."
However, it is a bit disturbing, as the Alliance for Human Research Protection alleges, that another Columbia study looked at psychotherapy effectiveness in public school students and participants were given invitations to receive "psychotropic" drugs. The DOE tells the Post, "Our children are not guinea pigs. The research is carefully vetted."





"The research is carefully vetted," said Jennifer Bell-Ellwanger, the DOE's director of assessment and accountability."
I'm confident that all participation was consentual and signed off on by parents
It's a shame that this reasearch, which seems innovative and needed, will be discredited because researchers paid subjects and offered free services.
it's also a shame that it will be scrutinized for selecting the poorest communities with the least bureaucratic red tape for their purposes.
the biggest shame is that someone with a vested interest in discrediting these studies has paid parents to be outraged...
i did a research study in college-- i observed a kindergarten class and just noticed whether boys were treated differently than girls. i did NOT interact with the kids at all. even when the teacher could've used a hand controlling one kid who killed the class goldfish!
i think non-intrusive studies are fine, but if the researcher has to interact with the students then i say get parental consent. no money or gifts should change hands.