
Yesterday, it was announced that Tishman Speyer's $5.4 billion bid for Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village was successful, making it the largest real estate deal in history. But what's interesting is that the second bid from Apollo was $5.33 billion. We wonder if Apollo executives are "What if"-ing right now. The bid organized by tenants to preserve middle-class housing was $4.5-4.9 billion - well behind the other bids - and City Councilman Daniel Garodnick, Peter Cooper resident, who worked on the tenants' bid said, “Eventually, I think what you will see is a market-rate, gated community, which is what MetLife was pitching to all the potential bidders.”
The crazy thing is that MetLife let Tishman Speyer they had won the deal at 6PM. The Sun reports, "A representative of Tishman Speyer showed up with a check, and an army of lawyers and brokers worked through the night to finalize the deal at about 9:15 a.m. yesterday." A check that big should have been on one of those crazy-big lottery checks! Imagine the MetLife executives depositing, oh, a 10% deposit - $540 million. The Sun also notes that retail development may be the key to making the deal worthwhile to Tishman Speyer and their two investment partners, Blackrock and the California State Teacher's Retirement System. A big question is how much of the development will be rent-regulated, though Tishman Speyer implied that rent-stabilized apartments are "completely protected" without further detail. The Post says the MetLife profit will be $3 billion with the $5.4 billion sale. A burning question: Was Lucy Van Pelt involved?
Some tenants blame Mayor Bloomberg for what's happened. Marcelle Wolfe, an 18 year resident, tells Metro, “Mayor Bloomberg is a good businessman except for what he’s done to Stuyvesant Town." However, Metro also spoke to 22 year old David Pintauro who moved in a few months ago: “Morally, I think what happened is horrible. There are a lot of old ladies in the building that I’m concerned about because making rent is hard enough. I’m 22, so if I got booted, it’s no big deal. There’s always Craigslist.” The Sun had a good paragraph explaining the Mayor's stance:
The tenants were seeking about $480 million in city funds to support their bid. The Bloomberg administration performed an analysis of what it would cost to support them and found that for the cost of preserving some of the Stuyvesant Town units, it could build twice as many new affordable units elsewhere, according to a city official. While the tenants have worried about the prospect of losing their apartments, city officials have noted that the tenants will be protected by existing rent stabilization laws after the deal is closed.For now, all eyes are on Jerry Speyer of Tishman Speyer. The NY Times and Daily News have articles about him, his properties and philanthropies.




I feel bad for the developers and the California teachers who are going to lose their pensions in this swindle of epic proportions.
everyone who lives in stuyvesant town is rich anwyay, It's like they pretend to be middle class but make an average of 100,000 a year. they deserve to have their rents raised. Stuyvesant town is luxury within a housing project with decrepit elevators. The place sucks.
Zac:
Yes. I'm sure you know more about real estate aquisition than Tishman-Speyer, Blackrock and Calpers. (rolling eyes)
Don't get me wrong, I don't want the luxury gated owners in here any more than anyone else, but...
This crusade to protect the middle class is hilarious! Anyone who is lucky enough to get into Stuy-Town is rich, rich, rich...or connected.
Whatever...move back to Long Island or Jersey...or craigslist it up like the rest of us orphans, I say.
Heaven forbid that the middle class of Manhattan should have to move to *gasp* - the Outer Boroughs!
Take a look at the Bronx & Western Queens, folks.
Also, does anyone else find the $200k x 3 years limit on rent stabilization insanely high?
So the winning developer's main business is office buildings. Seems to me the deal for them is all about the land - eventually they'll bulldozer the buildings and put large commercial and residential buildings. What would it cost to put together a parcel of that size anywhere else in Manhattan? I bet it would be a hell of a lot more than $5.4B, and take much longer than the - what? two month bidding process here?
Do rent regulations restrict an owner from demolishing a building? Do they just have to buy out tenants to do that? Durst wasn't shy about handing out million-dollar pay days to tenants and owners in Brooklyn for the Atlantic yards development.
Whatever - all the good stuff that used to make Manhattan what it was is all in Queens and Brooklyn now anyway. So, why do people even care about living in Manhattan these days? It's a ghost town as far as any kind-of energy or life is concerned.
Yeah, brilliant statement. Manhattan = ghost town. But I think you're on to something.... no life in Manhattan...island packed with dead people... omg! Manhattan is full of zombies? Run! Aim for their heads! Someone should make this into a movie...
I don't feel sorry for alot of these so called middle class regulated tenants. Our neighbors in Peter Cooper Village are a doctor and a lawyer. They got in in the 80's because she went to NYU. Is there a reason they should pay less than half of my rent other than timing and dumb luck? It's in our interest to bring up market supply- it will help our rates.
On a side note, new restaurants are coming as well as a Gracefully. This hood is coming up!