
Democratic Governor hopeful Eliot Spitzer brought some life back into the gay marriage debate here in New York on Thursday night at an event for the Empire State Pride Agenda when he told the audience that "we will make it law in New York."
Considering Spitzer's lead in the polls, his remarks were unexpected if welcome. “We will not ask whether this proposition of legalizing same-sex marriage is popular or unpopular; we will not ask if it’s hard or easy; we will simply ask if it’s right or wrong,” he told the audience according to the Times. “I think we know in this room what the answer to that question is.”
However, if (or when) Spitzer becomes Governor nothing would happen too quickly on the matter. Though a gay marriage bill would be unlikely to have much trouble in the Democrat-heavy State Assembly it would likely suffer in the Republican-controlled State Senate. And of course there are other, more pressing, issues the state needs to resolve. In the words of Empire State Pride Agenda executive director Alan Van Capelle:
“New York has a lot of problems,” he said. “When Eliot Spitzer takes office on January 1, he’s going to have to fix Medicaid reform, there’s school funding, there’s a dragging upstate economy, and he needs to tackle those issues, but I’m confident that at the end of his first term as governor, we’ll have marriage equality in New York State.”
We don't know about you, but we'd like that to be true.
Photo by AP Photo/David Duprey




Attaboy Spitzer! Finally, a Dem I can vote for without holding my nose.
New York is one of the few places where we could conceivably win marriage equality legislatively -- and doing it through law (rather than through the courts) would be a broader p.r. victory that could help stem the backlash since Goodridge in MA. Elliot already had my vote, but now I'll be proud to volunteer for his campaign.
Nate
OMFG. I can't believe he's campaigning on this. I love Elliot Spitzer.
niiiiice, spitz.
I'd like that to be true too.
I don't think people consider the ramifications of Gay Marriage, and the impact on the social security system.. After 10 years of marriage the spouse can get those benefits...
uhhh, we got enough problems with the system ready to collapse now, why burden it further?
Spank That Donkey-
If the federal government were to recognize gay marriage, its effects on the social security system should surely be considered... but since they don't... social security benefits would not go to a gay spouse..
Your argument has no merit.
Cool! He'd probably have my vote anyway, but this is icing on the cake.
Michael:
I think the Feds are considering it's impact, and that is why it is not so much a "national" issue. Please give this post a read for further misgivings of single sex marriage...
http://www.spankthatdonkey.com/spankthatdonkey2/2006/7/7/marriage-amendment-go-forth-be-fruitful-long-version.html