<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village&apos;s Environmental Issues</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php</link>
<description>All comments for Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village&apos;s Environmental Issues</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 design_jill</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jpriluck@earthlink.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jpriluck@earthlink.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>PCV Dweller</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-752950</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-752950</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:46:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To Not Amused- I don&apos;t think the apartments were ever offered for sale in the past. It has always been a rental community. And actully, it&apos;s those people that pay $500 a month for an 800 square foot Manhattan apartment that are protected by laws, while us market-rate people are at the mercy of the management. I&apos;m not complaining though, it still is a fair value for the amount of space compared to the rest of the available rentals in the city.

As for the environmental issues...should I be concerned if there is an enormous hole in the courtyard in front on my building--and construction workers are wearing white plastic suits that they need to wash off when the come out of the hole?

At least they are putting the strange-looking dirt that they are digging up on to plastic tarps. Should I believe the signs on the fence (which is a wooden fence because they obviously didn&apos;t want passers-by to see through a chain link fence) that says they are fixing the plumbing? 

It definitely smells of tar and chemicals around the site.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Not Amused</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-406224</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-406224</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To all the residents of Cooper Village: DEAL WITH IT ! So the nice folks at Metlife decided to sell the property that you all enjoy . Big deal, This sort of thing happens on a regular basis . Did anyone living their think to purchase there apartments when they moved in ? Some on these people have been living there for years decades . It&apos;s the same thing that the poor folk have to go through in the real middle class neighborhoods . Buck up and move to another neighborhood . Those owners want to sell that property to the highest bidder and the new owners want to jack up the rents to support the surrounding area . Gentrfied to the extreme!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>question</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-391729</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-391729</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:43:17 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;amazing that it taken so long for the environmental issues to surface if Peter Cooper Vill/Stuy Town was built, so long ago, on these former gas plants.  i guess it is of course only now that there are billions to be made that MetLife / ConEd / whoever actually expresses some interest in the well-being of the generations of those who have lived in these buildings.  and what impact will environmentals have on the marketability of PCV-ST to a buyer?  probably not much -- especially if the public doesn&apos;t hear much about them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Banana</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-389644</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-389644</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:47:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Jay -- 

Who is this J. Chung and why were you not amused to find out she was the poster?

Also, where did it say who the poster was?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jay</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-389185</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/09/26/i_have_seen_tha.php#comment-389185</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Now, as I am a daily Gothamist reader I hate to do this, but please, please, have someone read over what Ms. Chung writes at the least. I frequently have to re-read what she has written countless times to my ire, and it was not amusing to find that it was indeed J. Chung who posting this article. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>