Uh Oh, Toys R Us Goes Up Against Breastfeeding Moms

2006_09_toysrus.jpg

Is Toys 'R Us right to not want to be Ta-Tas 'R Us? Or should they be more forgiving of their customers who are feeding future customers? Or is everyone crying over unspilt milk? A Brooklyn mother claims she was harassed by three or four female store employees when she breast fed her 7 month old son at the Times Square Toys 'R' Us on Monday. Chelsi Meyerson says she went to an "out of the way" place to nurse son Mason, but soon after, a store employee said, "You have to go down to the basement to do that." More employees appeared to tell Meyerson she had to move because there were "children around," and then the store's security was called in. Now, Meyerson has called in the New York Civil Liberties Union, which has asked the toy retailer for an apology and "appropriate compensation," as NY State civil rights law permits women the right to breast-feed wherever they like.

Toys 'R' Us claims they simply asked Meyerson if she would be more comfortable in a private area (they have one specifically for breastfeeding moms) and deny that security was called. The store manager told the Daily News, "We take this opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to nursing moms." But they didn't realize that Meyerson's mother is apparently a "high-ranking official" in La Leche League, a breast feeding support group!

Who do you believe, the mom or the store? In our experience, breastfeeding moms generally try to be discreet about breastfeeding - even if they are in a very public place - so it's not terribly awkward. And you can read the letter the NYCLU sent to Toys 'R' Us here (PDF).

Email This Entry


Comments (95) [rss]

Doesn't it seem possible, given her connection to La Leche, that she made a scene on purpose? This smells like a publicity stunt.

Even so, if our culture wasn't so scandalized by the sort-of appearance of a breast in public, this wouldn't be a problem.

Whatever happened to discretion in this country? If you have nowhere else to go it's understandable but why flaunt it? It's bad enough that the Park Slope mommies bring their rug rats everywhere - like bars.

user-pic

Another reason to get rid of the smoking ban - there has to be somewhere to go to get away from these people.

It isn't that people are necessarily scandalized by it. We just don't want to see people perfoming bodily functions. We don't pick our noses in public, do we?

user-pic

Feeding a child in public shouldn't be a big deal. This woman should get an apology, probably, but financial compensation? Come on.

people pick their noses in public all the time, wether we like it or not, and I've never seen anyone given shit for it, just bad looks.

It depends on whose story you believe. If it's hers, then Toys R Us sucks as, regardless of what affilation she may have. If it's Toys R Us, then it's great that they have a designated place for it.

But it's a toy store, with many parents and kids where alot of them were probably breastfeed themselves, so it's almost a double standard. Breastfeeding is natural and normal. American's are just too friggen up tight. Anywhere else in the world there wouldn't have been a stink, but this is a country where people flip at the slightest bit of nippple, we're too sheltered.

And if you've seen women breasfeeding, its never full out boob in your face, so you should put those comments aside. Most mothers are very descrete, with a towel over themselves and their baby.

Take Toys R' US' money and get yourself a blanket to cover your tatas while feeding your spawn and shopping.

While you are entitled to your opinion, breastfeeding is not really in the nose picking or bodily function category. It is a baby being fed. It is necessary for the health of the child, and often must be done every couple hours. That being said, it becomes very difficult to NOT do it in public without becoming a shut-in.

Also, most women nurse so discretely that no breast is really showing; if something does show it is for a quick second. As for "why flaunt it?" - well, because we can. The ability to not only gestate and birth a child, but to then nurish him as well is something of which to be proud. So, get your mind out of the gutter and appreciate the beauty of it. Or, here's a thought, look away.

So like she never heard of pumping before going out? like don't they sell those devices in the stores?

I agree with Austin, this seems like it may be a publicity stunt. Even if it's not, what the hell is "appropriate compensation"?

The security tapes will clear this up. It's that easy.

Seriously, enough with the "American's are uptight" crap. This country has far more cultures mixed together than any European country. Someone is always going to be bothered by something. Sometimes we have to bend to the least offensive standard. What if there are parents with kids at Toys R Us and the kids starts asking daddy why that woman is taking her shirt off? Maybe the parent doesn't want to have to have this discussion with a four year old in the middle of the store.

As for the nose picking, you can sit in judgement of someone picking their nose but nobody can dare sit in judgement of breastfeeding?

Breastfeeding in public is disgusting and barbaric. Hasn't this woman heard of a breast pump! Or better yet, baby formula.

user-pic

If there is a place set aside for breast feeding, nursing mothers should use it. I think this woman is flaunting it for a cause because her mother is a high official of Le Leche League.

Wow, the commenters at Gothamist never cease to amaze...

Wow, I guess these comments reflect the fruit of the loins of thoudsands of God-Fearing Fundie Children from Nowhere Towns.

How proud they must be.....

Why would anybody be in favor of less breasts being shown in public? Bring it on, I say.

Seriously, this is a mother nursing her baby. End of story. It's no big deal. Even a four-year old is capable of understanding that.

*sigh*

Everyone saying "just use a breastpump before you go out!" is just ignorant of how nursing works. Trust me when I say that it's a bad idea for a mom to do this on several levels- bad for supply, possible nipple confusion...

Plus, it's a pain in the ass, and why should moms *have* to pump and bottlefeed in public? It's just a baby eating.

while its her right to feed in public, i suppose if she knew that she were going to a toy store where children likely outnumber adults, i think discretion would have been appropriate. even though she's feeding, she still has her tit out. if they offered her the opportunity to nurse in a designated area, she should have taken them up on it, and not thrown a hissy fit.

Given the usual level of "customer service" in this city, I have no trouble believing that store employees did a very poor job communicating with this woman and were, more than likely, downright rude.

user-pic

"possible nipple confusion"

At last, my new band has a name.

Pumping isn't always an option, and it's disingenuous to imply it is.

The La Leche League leave the impression of zealots who've hijacked a point worthy of much discussion. Some LLL members' rhetoric remind me of the way *some* lesbians with identity issues treat bisexual women.

We're not being 'sheltered' when the sight of Janet Jackson's nipple instigates Congressional hearings. We're being told how to talk and behave. It's a process of control.

People are way too eager to let others think they're outraged by mommas and their lactating boobies.

Publicity stunt or no, suing for compensation always gets more attention than just suing for an apology. What does -that- say about us?

Children are not shamed by breasts if it is treated naturally. It is not the natural condition of human beings to be shamed by the nakedness of others. That's something we bring about culturally. If breast feeding is explained to children they will think nothing of it. They will just be curious.

user-pic

neil.....THANK YOU!!!

Another note:

Everyone is missing the fact that three employees harrassed the woman.

What happened to customer service. What kind of customer service is that? The employees need to be retrained.

THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT....!!!

If the Emperor is naked....we don't need the comon lowly staff to tell the King his business. Treat customers like gold and...with the highest respect. Let a manager handle situations that could potentially damage the integrity of the store. If handled wrong, the situation could cause a decline in business. When you rent on Time Square, you need all the good business you can get. That business is mothers and fathers with children and grandchildren. Aunts, Uncles, relatives, friends...etc...etal... Especially, new born children. Expectant mothers register at Toys R Us for shower gifts. It is big business.

user-pic

Toy R Us should have had a manager escort the woman to a more appropriate place to breast feed.
If breast feeding offends some people...no matter how ok it is, give her an area to breast feed. You can not force people to accept public breast feeding. Although she is discrete, it still makes many uncomfortable.

It is no different then smoking in public building. It is now only appropriate to smoke outside and the only "legal" place. Smokers are not bothered by smoke but "some" non-smokers are. Therefore, they were moved outside. Or some place still have a smoking lounge.

"There are children around."

That's a good one. I guess it doesn't occur to this minimum wage sales clerk that it's us adults that have sexually stigmatized breasts. Children don't give a rat's ass.

As for the boob (pun intended) who asked "whatever happened to discretion" above, the article did say she went to an out of the way place.

Finally, for the other boob who claims it's a bodily function, well, so it is. But it's not elimination. It's consumption. "What's next?" Maybe people eating and drinking in public. Oh, the horror! My eyes, my eyes! Can we ever survive that?

user-pic

mh is right, breastfeeding is a lot like smoking. Just as secondhand smoke endangers other people indoors, a breastfeeding mother's milk might squirt out of control and possibly drown a poor, innocent child.

If there was a designated breast-feeding area then she should have used it. Children's love or fear of breasts is irrelevant. The burden was on her to decipher the store employees' efforts to communicate that a breast-feeding area existed. The employees are hired based on their willingness to wear a smock and get paid poorly not their communication skills. It's clear that she has a breast, er, axe to grind.

mh-
The customer is always right:

"She said the mother was approached just once by a store employee who, *in response to customer complaints* about the breast-feeding,"

Which customer are you referring to?

Stupid publicity whore.

Brightliner:
It funny that she says she was in an out of the way place in one sentence, then claims they were there within 30 seconds of starting the feeding. Seems it would be difficult to rectify both statements.

Agreed, "there are children around" is a moronic objection. (If your child did indeed ask "why is that woman taking her shirt off" - even though that is not how a child would actually interpret the sight in real life since nobody actually disrobes to nurse - just freakin' explain it to them.)

I have to say that the tale rings true, seems quite likely to have happened the way the woman describes it. TRS should publicly apologize.

Toys R us will lose, did you see the mother's cute little daughter on TV? (they were celebrating her birthday)
Put her on the stand vs. TRU and we'll see who's gonna win. That and the LAW states mothers can breast feed.
HA HA, you uptight suckas.

If this women was rudely treated by one or more Toys R Us employees, then by all means she deserves an apology. It's not unthinkable, though, that simply by an employee pointing out that there is a designated area for breast-feeding and suggesting that the woman go there, she may have felt "badly treated." I personally don't think most little kids will notice/care much about a woman breast-feeding with discretion, and they'll be content with a short answer: "She's feeding her baby."

HOWEVER, even as a woman, I personally find it a bit disgusting to see breast-feeding in public. I was catching a quick bite at a Whole Foods and a woman was unabashedly breast-feeding in the sit-down eating area. Yes, I realize the baby was eating, too, but Whole Foods being as it is I had to take the first available seat, which put my line of vision right at this woman's saggy side-boob and her baby chomping away. Ugh.

Bottom line: breast-feed in the bathroom, ladies lounge, etc. if at all possible. At least make it seem like you've made an effort. Kids are lot of work, no one ever said they aren't. Ladies, having a baby WILL change your lifestyle, you can't just keep being an urban sophisticate the same as you were before but this time with another person latched on your chest here, there, and anywhere. Not appropriate.

user-pic

Brightliner: Some people do eat like they were raised in a cave. It may not be a bad idea to have some people eat in the pitch dark.

user-pic

Do any of the anti-breastfeeding-in-public commenters here have children? And if they do, did they or do they breastfeed?

Answering that might shine light on the situation better than all this pontificating.

"re-re"

What's so hard about "rectifying" both statements? Do you mean perhaps "reconcile?" Do you think a woman can just "whip it out" and go for it? Even with a nursing bra, it can take a minute to get ready. How about this for a scenario: She sits down in a corner and begins her preparations, unbuttoning her blouse. Some uptight customer (probably a male, since the negative comments here are predominantly males who likely aren't fathers, and possibly a smoker who thinks they're discriminated against because they're forced to take unhealthy secondhand smoke outside ;-) sees her getting ready and runs to a clerk, yelling, "There's a woman stripping!" 30 seconds after she finally starts nursing, clerk begins harassment. How do you know the clerk didn't run up to her anyway?

Whatever happened to discretion? People forget that discretion runs both ways. If they're not flaunting it, you don't have to stare. And she wasn't flaunting it. Any imbecile who commented that she was had better be able to point out any sentence in any of the articles that said she just did it in the middle of the store, or they should just shut up.

user-pic

this has everything to do with poor manners and a sense of entitlement and nothing to do with civil rights or bodily functions.

with this thread the myth of New Yorkers being sophisticated is officially busted.

mh,

You're absolutely right. People eating in public is disgusting. Let's close down all the restaurants including Le Cirque so we don't have to suffer such indignities as watching other people eat.

Breastfeeding is 1000% appropriate when done discreetly -- just like many, many things are appropriate when done discreetly.

And, like many things, even 1000% appropriate activities can cross the line into inappropriateness when they're *not* done with discretion.

If everyone could just be sensitive to their fellow man, er woman...... the world would be better for everyone including breastfeeding mommies!

Brightliner with a another daily dose of wild extrapolation (shut down all restaurants) and name calling (boob) of anyone that dares to disagree with you.

user-pic

re-re: use the brain God gave you. Two customers. 1 + 1 = 2. They are both right...dah dee dumb.

The both need to be treated as customers the store values.

Is it strange that I'm gay... and I'm totally for more boobies being displayed in public???

Personally, I don't even believe that a real customer complained. I think it is plausible that the staff just went ballistic.

The discrepancy between the Toy flack's account and the woman's basically says that somebody is lying, big time. It boils down to this: Which do you believe - a bunch of midtown clerks bully some woman and then a manager tries to gloss over it, or woman is treated politely but makes up lots of untrue details in an effort to gain attention.

(Like someone already suggested, let's see the security tape!)

user-pic

"It is no different then smoking in public building."

No, it's very dangerous. Smoking harms your health. Secondhand smoking harms your health. Seeing something that's natural and postive doesn't. It might upset some people, but it hey get upset over something like that, they need to be upset a little. Expands their mind.

I happen to live in the same neighborhood as Chelsi and know her. She is a lovely woman who contributes much to our community, as does the rest of her family. I know that this is not a stunt, but a genuine reaction to outrageous and unenlightened behavior on the part of Toys R Us. I stand fully behind her, and think it's stunning that people are still so uncomfortable watching a woman feed her infant. If they are uncomfortable or disgusted, that's something they need to deal with -- not Chelsi or any other breastfeeding woman who are using their breasts in the way they are meant to be used.

As a side note, it's ironic that all this took place in a Toys R Us located in Times Square. If folks want to avoid seeing exposed breasts (and usually outside the context of breastfeeding), choose another neighborhood to frequent!

Is it me... or does it seem like kitg not been to Times Square in 15 years... thinking there are exposed breasts there??

I hope I'm not missing boobies somewhere...

user-pic

Michael,

Have you seen the giant Jenna Jameson billboard or the big adds for the Hawaiian Tropic Restaurant and bar? Surely those are more sexualized than a woman feeding her kid.

I'm pregnant with my first child and hope to breastfeed. A fun fact about infants: they eat every couple of hours. So it's nearly impossible for a breastfeeding mom to leave the house, kid in tow, and NOT need to nurse in public. What no one has mentioned is that the mom in this story knew the kid was hungry. That means he was either crying or about to have a meltdown. How many easily offended store clerks or fellow customers would have shot mom very dirty looks had she traipsed through the whole huge store with a wailing infant in search of a private room that she may not have known even existed? I suspect she did what she could to keep baby happy, thus preserving the peace for herself and those around her.

To Whom It May Concern,

Shows what you know. Until today, I've posted maybe twice in the last week, hardly "daily." You with your usual dose of wild exaggeration. You're even too cowardly to come up with your own nick. You are a boob and chickenshit to boot. Somehow, I don't think you'll be replying to this with a real nick.

here's how im guessing it went down:

woman starts breastfeeding, low-level clerk comes up and asks her to stop in a rude way, woman demands to talk to a manager. the manager suggests that she use the designated breastfeeding area, but by that point it was already an issue that could possibly warrant compensation, so she made a big stink (which im not saying she shouldn't have!)

but seriously... why does this woman think she's entitled to any money? i understand that she was mistreated and i feel for her, but this is new york city. i get mistreated by customer service people every day! that shit just happens here.

user-pic

kitg: It is nice that you support your friend. I support her rights also.

However, a person is not free to do whatever they please, especially, if it makes other people uncomfortable. You can not yell fire in a crowded auditorium when there is no fire, you have to wear clothes to work, even though you may be comfortable with nudity. We are not free to do as we please. Also, a person can not eat during a church service in the sanctuary. It is not customary.

Be realistic.

There should be a breast feeding lounge, just as there are cafeterias to sit down and eat in.

Just for those who forgot or didn't know...

There is a law that states women can breastfeed publicly without any prejudice or penalty. Again, a law.

Despite your distatse for it, she had every right to breastfeed wherever in the store she chose. While it may be more polite to use a designated area, she would not have been required to do so.

user-pic

You need to look at the law again. And also, how does the law define, public? Outside of the home?

Wow, the ignorance abounds. I proudly breastfed my child for two years. I tried to time outings around his in between feeding times, but sometimes it was not realistic. As far as pumps, that is all well and good, but anyone with experience and knowledge will tell you that NOT ALL women can pump successfully, or in great quantities. I was one of them. My son has never been sick, and has a healthy, slim body unlike the formula fed tribe. And, I actually had people that were so oblivious to the fact that I was BF my child in public, that they would start a conversation with me and then be very surprised when he extracated himself.

Is it barbaric for a dog to feed her welps? Humans are animals, plain and simple. I find it intriguing that in my experience, the people that oppose bf in public most, are very religious and right wing. You know what? Your Lord and Savior sucked on boobs for at least the first couple years of his life, and if you believe in God, then you should realize God put those things there for more than holding up your Ralph Lauren sweater.

You can go anywhere else in the world, and not have a second glance if you nurse your child, but in the US, it is some sort of travesty. It's okay to allow your children to watch Monday night football, which is so barbaric that the players have to wear so much protective gear, but feeding our babies is a sin. Please, spare me the Puritanical BS.

As for this woman, she should have an apology. Compensation, no. But I certainly would never shop there again if I were her.

Is this clear enough?

NY CLS Civ R § 79-e (Article 7 Miscellaneous Provisions).
1994 N.Y. ALS 98; 1994 N.Y. LAWS 98; 1994 N.Y. S.N. 3999

§ 79-E. Right To Breast Feed.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breast feed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether or not the nipple of the mother's breast is covered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

could someone please explain this to me...

don't "public" laws not pertain to private areas, such as retail stores, malls, etc... wouldn't a public law mean she could breastfeed her child on city property such as parks, sidewalks, etc etc.

user-pic

Uh, the law states that a woman may breastfeed ANYWHERE she is legally allowed to be. As far as I know, women with infants are legally allowed to shop still, so regardless of where in the store she was nursing, she was within her rights to do so.

You're right, they can't force you to do anything, so why do you think anyone should be able to force a nursing mother into a hot, stuffy, usually filthy room? Just who the he** are you to think you get to make those kinds of decisions about an entire section of the population. You don't like it? Don't ogle it!

As well, her mother being an "official" in LLL means squat. They're not a political organization - they're a SUPPORT organization. Mention activism at a meeting and they'll shoot you down faster than anything I've ever seen. LLL has NOTHING to do with this incident, whatsoever. (Besides instilling a sense of confidence in this woman to be able to stand up for her LEGALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS!)

Compensation? I don't think she's asked for any money - just fancy lawyer speak from the NYCLU that seems to have done more harm than good. It is my understanding she merely wants an apology and for TRU employees to be better educated about the LAW.

user-pic

"§ 14-190.9. Indecent exposure.
(B) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a woman may breast feed in any public or private location where she is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother's breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

They key here is, "where she is otherwise authorized to be." She was authorized to breast feed in the basement, not on the showroom floor.

Regardless, the management should have handled the situation in a professional manner. Why is this a blog source? Because Toy R Us does not know how to treat customers.

Public laws pertain to private areas in most cases (you can't murder someone in your home just because it's your private residence) and in this particular law, it specifically states "in any location, public or private." As long as she otherwise has a right to be there - and presumably anyone is allowed into Toys R Us - she has a right under the law to breastfeed.

"where she is otherwise authorized to be," means flatly that if a woman, as an individual, has a right to be in that space, then she has a right to breastfeed there. she is authorized to shop in a toy store, so may breastfeed there. (it is within the store's right to ask her not to breastfeed in the store's stockroom because she is not authorized, as a non-employee, to be there, nor is any other non-employee.)

the breastfeeding area is provided by the store as a courtesy, not as a mandatory pen for lactating mothers. courtesy extends both ways, of course, and a woman may move to the breastfeeding area, but is not obligated under the law or any enforceable store policy to do so.

I'm so, so, so, so sick of this Puritanical streak about the human body. For the record I'm a single New Yorker with no kids, and here's my six cents: I don't think breastfeeding mothers should be discreet EVER. I think every last breastfeeding female should go out of their way to breast feed as publicly as possible as often as possible, flashing boobs and nipples as blatantly as possible until everybody just friggin gets over it. All of y'all who think using the breast to feed an infant (the purpose for which it was made) is objectionable need to get repulsed by something that's truly objectionable -- like racism, sexism, the decline of public education, the war in Iraq, all of the Bush administration's domestic policy, and so forth.

user-pic

Hey Michael: I live in NYC and been to Times Square more than a few times in the past few months. Look up at the advertising marquees next time you're there.

MH: Sorry that breastfeeding makes you uncomfortable. There are lots of things that make me uncomforable -- and I recognize that it's my problem, not someone else's. You must admit that there's a huge difference between someone yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre and someone feeding a hungry child. It's a poor equation.

Do you mean a lawyer with a license to practice and passed the bar. Or purchased your degree off of the internet lawyer? And your specialty is civil liberties?

Brightliner: you should save the scenarios for Hollywood screne writers. Learn to comprehend what you read, and keep your response in the context that relates to the issue. It helps to understand what you are talking about when you respond. I have read all of your posts and they all are a misguided response to other threads. Your mind is high on exaggeration.

user-pic

bumbalclaut, if you are questioning the credentials of someone, then please tell us yours?

If men could breastfeed, too, would attitudes be different? Discuss.

a:

My credentials are my intelligence. I don't need to offer a title in exchange for your agreement.

Speak for yourself. Who is us?

When a person puts their title on display as if it holds authority, they should be questioned. Gullibility was never among my strong suits.

Just because I may say that I am a clown, it does not give me the credentials or the knowledge or experience of BoZo.

I don't have to justify anything.

Why is stating that one does not want to see a woman breastfeeding her offspring automatically make people assume you are a conservative fundamentalist? For me, the issue is not the boob being revealed. (I'm not sure about this, but I think it's legal for women to go topless in NY.) I don't have a problem with breasts. But nursing is another ballpark. It's a bodily function, and like pissing or pooping, it seems it should be done in private. I really don't understand why once someone has a child they seem to become incredibly selfish and forget that a world exists beyond their brood.

I would love to see a man breastfeed! :-P

The law is clear (and covers public AND private, and does not mean only BF in a nasty bathroom or basement), and whether 'lawyer' actually is or not is irrelevant. They happen to be right. I'm sorry, but the last place I want to eat a meal is in the bathroom, so why should my kid be forced to eat there??

It's like when I see a heavy girl (I'm a chubby gal too, and not a heavy girl-hater) wearing a half shirt and camel-toe tight jeans. It disgusts me, and I look away. If you don't like it, don't look. I certainly wouldn't complain to have the person forcefully removed from my 'area'.

I also find religious zealots that come to my door obnoxious. I wonder if I can have them removed, and then sue them for offending me and disrupting my day?

Babies pee and poop in public all the time. Maybe that means families should be forced to stay home until the babies are potty trained.

The most boisterous crowd against BF in public ARE conservative. I can appreciate someone being uncomfortable with a mother that is not discreet AT ALL, but the majority of BF mothers I have known, talked to, seen, etc., are very discreet. And BF clothing makes it virtually impossible to see anything. If it makes you feel any better, imagine the mother is holding a bottle while nuzzling her child.

And by the way, eating is also a bodily function that people do in public all the time. Hell, if you go to a club or bar, you're bound to see someone puking, and even taking a piss outside because they are too drunk to know any better. Do what the rest of the thinking world does. Ignore it and move on. Complain to your buddies about it. Cringe in a corner, whatever.

All you militant mommies keep making the point that breastfeeding is just your child eating.

Most stores have a 'no food allowed' policy as far as I know.

So kindly knock off the "I'll do what I want where I want and fuck everyone else" attitudes.

-a liberal, but conscientious guy

'More employees appeared to tell Meyerson she had to move because there were "children around," '

Yes, in fact there was one on her boob at that very moment!

Seriously, big deal! It's only a boob. Get a life.

Lisa (#71) - you said, "I would love to see a man breastfeed! :-P"

Here you go:
http://www.unassistedchildbirth.com/miscarticles/milkmen.html

Only in the US would you have this happen.
I am so sick of this nonsense. For all of you who want to hide nursing moms in the basement. Bad words come to mind. Let's put it this way! You have no clue what most moms go through to nurse their babies. I had a horrible infection on one of my breasts. My daughter would not latch. Then only on the left side. I went through so much pain you have no idea. The last thing on my mind were closed-minded,ignorant people with sexuality hang-ups. I did anything I could to nurse my daughter. You should appreciate every mom that cares to breastfeed. It keeps healthcare costs lower. That is good for all of society.
To all of you who say: She should just pump! Who are you? have you pumped? Babies benefit from direct breast contact. Numerous studies have shown that this is extremly beneficial for mom's and child's health. If you have no clue, don't talk.
Don't compare breastfeeding to peeing, pooping, and picking your nose. How silly is that? When I read such stuff I must ask myself if some people have actually made it past a second grade education. My 13 year old son has more sense than that.
If your children are afraid of boobs, it's time to tell them that boobs have a natural function. Maybe you should seek counseling if you are this uptight.
If anyone would have told me to go in the basement they would have been in trouble. All I have to say is that there are lots of people that I think should be locked up in there. Right-wing Republicans are an example. Or, let's see, women with big implants and trashy looks could go in there. Oh wait- I am more tolerant. I look away when something bothers me.

user-pic

If you're against women breastfeeding in public, shouldn't you also be against men going shirtless? Some of the guys I see in the park have large pendulous boobs. Should my sensitive young children have to see that? ;)

In all seriousness, I see lots of things I don't want to see in this city. Unless it's truly physically hurting someone, I look away.

I highly doubt that the woman was flaunting her breasts by feeding her child. Whatever the case, no one should have approached her for doing it. If the baby's hungry and the mother finds a comfortable spot (outside of the "designated" area), she should still be allowed to breastfeed. I mean, it's not like she was offering breastmilk to kids who were not her own!

Irony: Manly men wanting women to hide their breasts, when they're usually trying to stare at women's breasts all day anyway.

Just here to say right on! to all the eloquent people on this thread who, hey actually understand the damn law, and also that breastfeeding moms are doing something that is normal, healthy, and legal. Honest to god, how immature do you have to be to not be able to look away if it offends you? You call yourself New Yorkers? How do you ride the subways with all the fat hairy men in transparent tees and drooling drunks, then? They're a hell of a lot more objectionable-looking than some innocent mom.

Hard to believe so many big strong manly types are completely unable to handle the idea that boobies make milk and babies need to eat from them. Oh horrors! You're a bunch of crybabies. Get a life.

I am horrified that an employee of a childrens toy store would even dare to bother a nursing mother feeding her CHILD. And the excuse... because there were "children" around. Hello... these "children" are the ones being breast fed so what is the issue here. Why must ignorant people constantly make feeding a baby out to be a "dirty" or sexual thing in their own minds and then attempt to force this unhealthy belief onto other people especially children who would otherwise see nothing wrong with this very natural and wholesome act. I nursed my daughter for 15 months and got my share of flack from uneducated and missinformed people but never have I heard of something so offensive as a store geared specifically towards children turning around and infringing on the rights of those same very children and their mothers by tring to tell them they cannot be fed like other babies in their store. I will NEVER shop at Toys R Us again... EVER. Jennifer USA

Oh and as to the debate about the laws stating that a mother can breastfeed anywhere that she is legally allowed access to by law it simply means exactly that. If she is allowed to be in that area at any time then she is allowed to nurse there. It does not mean that she allowed to nurse in that store but only in the designated square they offer for breastfeeding in some dank basement it means if she is allowed in the store she is allowed to nurse there. After all, she is not only allowed to shop in their basement is she? No, she is allowed to shop the entire store so therefore she may feed her child where ever she may shop, walk, stand, sit or otherwise occupy space. So, can she walk into the corporate offices in the back to nurse? No, the stock room? No. But the rest of the store? YES... without question.

i'm so disgusted with what seems like over half of these comments. i can't believe so many people are against breastfeeding. i really can't. for those of you who say you don't want to see "bodily functions" ... that is a BABY eating their lunch, i've got two ideas for you to think about :
1. you have eyes. you have the right to just look away. exercise your right and shut up already.
2. next time you're eating a bag of chips or an ice cream cone or whatever in public, maybe you should stop, since you obviously believe that eating in public is disgusting.

user-pic

I tend to believe the store over the milking mommy specifically because of what organization her mother is involved with. And most normal women would look for an out of the way place to express milk instead of flaunting it like a $2 dollar whore.

user-pic

Thanks, Lisa.

You summed up what I would've liked to say just perfectly.

And I'm childless and still feel that way.

As a PR rep for Toys “R” Us, can I just say that this has been much ado about nothing? Two sides to every story right? See the Timeline below.

Thanks.

Richard Laermer
CEO
RLM PR

Toys “R” Us, Inc. Response to Allegations Made By the NYCLU

Re: Ms. Chelsi Meyerson

Thursday, September 14

- New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) issued a press release to the media alleging that Toys “R” Us Times Square employees had not allowed a guest, Chelsi Meyerson, to breastfeed her child on the selling floor.

- After issuing the press release, the NYCLU sent a letter to Toys “R” Us, Inc. Chairman and CEO, Jerry Storch, reiterating their allegations, and giving Toys “R” Us no time to fully investigate Ms. Meyerson’s claims before sending their release to the media and notifying Toys “R” Us

- Subsequently, the NYCLU claimed Ms. Meyerson had “exhausted all her options” of trying to contact someone at the company. However, upon speaking to Ms. Meyerson, Toys “R” Us learned she had contacted Guest Services, but made no attempt to contact Jerry Storch, despite the NYCLU’s ability to fax him a letter directly, nor did she call Ron Boire, President of Toys “R” Us, U.S., or anyone in the Public Relations Department, whose contact information is readily available on the company’s corporate website.

- Upon receiving media calls about the NYCLU’s press release, Toys “R” Us worked quickly to determine the facts and issue a public statement denying the allegations and stating the company’s breastfeeding policy.

- In the meantime, Ms. Meyerson and the NYCLU conducted a series of media interviews, which continued into Friday, September 15, telling their version of the “facts”.

Friday, September 15

- Toys “R” Us continued its thorough investigation of the allegations to determine the chain of events.

- Among other things, Toys “R” Us spoke to employees who had contact with Ms. Meyerson (on 9/11/06) and/or observed the situation, and reviewed security tapes.

- Toys “R” Us issued an internal communication to all Toys “R” Us stores and Babies “R” Us stores nationwide to reiterate the company’s in-store breastfeeding policy.

- The Toys “R” Us Public Relations team began receiving calls from breastfeeding moms and breastfeeding educators, who shared their positive experiences in Babies “R” Us and Toys “R” Us stores. Several of these people offered to speak to the media on behalf of Toys “R” Us.

Monday, September 18

- Mindy Clements, General Manager of Toys “R” Us Times Square, called Ms. Meyerson to discuss her “experience” and to apologize to the extent Ms. Meyerson felt she had been harassed or embarrassed.

- Toys “R” Us sent letters from Jerry Storch and from Mindy Clements to the NYCLU (see attached) in response to the NYCLU’s 9/14/06 letter.

Tuesday, September 19

- Toys “R” Us had a subsequent conversation with the NYCLU to reiterate the company’s policy on breastfeeding in stores, to share the conversation Toys “R” Us had with Ms. Meyerson, and to inform the NYCLU it was incumbent upon them to correct the public record

Wednesday, September 20

- Toys “R” Us called to the NYCLU to determine the steps the NYCLU had taken to set the record straight. No response was received.

Mr. Laermer,

What exactly is the Toys "R" Us breastfeeding policy mentioned in your post?

Sincerely,
Sarah Richardson

Here's the official Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us breastfeeding policy:

Toys "R" Us, Inc.'s nursing policy, applicable in all Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores, is as follows:

Any mother may breastfeed her child in the place of her choice within our stores. Although some of our stores have designated areas for mothers to feed, remember that it is the mother's choice as to where she would prefer to breastfeed. Our organization is fully committed to the rights of breastfeeding mothers.

Regards,

Richard Laermer

I'm currently breastfeeding my 2mo. old son. I wish people who are against public breastfeeding could experience the pure joy of successful breastfeeding. There's absolutely nothing like watching my son's face getting red from sucking hard trying to get the most out of my breasts. The survival instinct of the little creature impresses me and often brings me tears. I'm so proud of the fact I'm breastfeeding and I wish I had a courage to do so in public. Do you know that not only babies need to be breastfed often but also mothers' beasts need to be emptied often otherwise they hurts so bad!

Amidst all this, Toys R Us carries female action figures that reveal more than any breastfeeding mothers do!

Amidst all this, Toys R Us carries female action figures that reveal more than any breastfeeding mothers do!

I have to say that it is ESPECIALLY possible! Despite that the human race is alive ONLY because of breastmilk, society still condemns it!

How sad!!

Let's just say that, just like Delta, Toys R Us now have a negative image with La Leche League International, breastfeeding professionals (like myself) and countless nursing mothers around the world!

i thnik breastfeednig in public is bad for the child

Is the following comment from "Shawn" for real?:

Breastfeeding in public is disgusting and barbaric. Hasn't this woman heard of a breast pump! Or better yet, baby formula

Better yet, baby formula? What have you ever read or heard that qualifies formula as "better" in any way or form? Are ya kidding me? Disgusting and barbaric? I am blown away by the stupidity of your statement.

To the other comments about conservative, religious people, I would never describe myself as religious (because I don't care for that term), but I am a committed Christian and fully believe that God created breasts to feed babies from Cain and Abel through Jesus through my son. Plain and simple. I am so sorry that other Christians have set a bad example. I strongly believe women have every right to breastfeed whenever and wherever their babies are hungry.

Breastfeeding is not the same as nosepicking or any other disgusting body habit. Breastfeeding is nutritive and healthy unlike nosepicking. Even if the woman was affiliated with LLL, it doesn't mean that she "purposely" did anything. Her son was hungry, regardless of any letters that might come after her name. Come on..half of the arguements here are infantile and ridiculous. Grow up and stop viewing the breast as sexual, something to be viewed only as an object.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

what picture?!?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS