Quantcast

Yardwork: Atlantic Yards Forum Roundup

+ The New York Times calls yesterday's Atlantic Yards community forum "polite" and estimates attendance at a few dozen people. Most speakers supported the project, no doubt a result of civic overload (given the district's active Congressional primary race) and Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn's boycott of the meeting. One Fort Greene native who lives in Park Slope attacked opponents who "live in brownstones," or many of her neighbors.

+ Norman Oder's Atlantic Yards Report calls the forum "brief and low-key," estimating approximately 125 attendees. Fort Greene's Friends of South Oxford Park (which opened in June after ten years of construction) asked, "Why should our newly flourishing park be subject to shadows on the playground on spring afternoons and winter days?" Okay, so we kind of empathize a little.

+ Gowanus Lounge proclaims September 12th a "Good Day for Atlantic Yards," given the primary day loss of anti-Yards candidate Chris Owens and others.

+ And the Sun has an Atlantic Yards-inspired editorial cartoon.

A second community forum will be held on Monday, September 18 from 4:30-8 at New York City Technical College. The public comment period has been extended to September 29.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Jon

    Yo Mutz, the supreme court decision involved seizing of land for public use. ie. The City of New London wanted to redevelopment its waterfront. Are you implying that you are against eminent domain abuse, no matter who the culprit? Or does the Atlantic Terminal boondoggle pass muster 'cause it's greedy real estate developers doing the chiseling and not (god forbid!) the government. Never mind that the New London waterfront is truly in need of redevelopment whereas Atlantic Yards project merely lines the pockets of real estate developers and politicians all over Brooklyn. Or maybe the definition of blight in New York in 2006 is any area without a majority of apartments renting for $3000/month. This isn't about whiny liberals and eminent domain abuse and it isn't about jobs. It's about greed, an out of control architect, and urban planning that will doom the neighorhood for generations.

  • nelson muntz

    Serves 'em right since it was the left wing of the Supreme Court that says it's ok to to use eminent domain for private development. Ha ha!

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com