
Were you in NYC on September 11? There's a fascinating article in the NY Times about psychological and perceived differences between New Yorkers who were here on September 11, 2001 and those who were not. Lots of interesting quotes, like:
“I think for the people that seen it on TV, it is more painful than for the people who saw it here,” said Paolo Gonzalez, 29, who manages a parking lot under the Brooklyn Bridge and who saw the attack. “For the other people it was real. If you was here, when the buildings came down the only thing you were thinking was, ‘Run.’ ”Some pre-9/11 New Yorkers don't understand why Ground Zero is so interesting to post-9/11 New Yorkers, while newcomers to the city just want to better understand what happened. While there are obvious differences between those who were here and those who weren't on that day, they don't take away from the fact that it was a terrible tragedy for everyone. You could have been walking home in the city after the attacks happened, live far away and still have a loved one who was killed. One small thing we regret is that new New Yorkers never knew what it was like to stand on the Avenue Americas and see the World Trade Center and know that was south - small, simple moments like that. It's certainly not about street cred. (This also makes us wonder how effective the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation's new ads asking where you were when you heard will be.)“I’ve been told that I just don’t get it and that I could never understand what it was like to be there in New York on Sept. 11,” said Laura Bassett, 27, who moved to the city from North Carolina after 2001. “I hate that five years later, people still debate which bystander is allowed to be more upset, the New Yorker or the American.”
This comes as the NY Times also announces that a poll finds two-thirds of New Yorkers worried about another attack - 69% versus only 22% of the nation. There are other interesting numbers - for instance 60% of New Yorkers are not interested in working at the new WTC on a high floor.
Photograph of the World Trade Center burning from Marty Lederhandler/AP (file)




I think there are tiers of experience - from being there on the ground, to watching the skyline crumble in the outer-boroughs and New Jersey, etc.
This seems like one of the more pointless things to argue about.
People who weren't in NYC at the time of the attacks will never know the unbelievable feeling of grief that hung over the city for weeks / months afterward, along with the horrible smell from ground zero, the shock and the post traumatic stress that kept you from sleeping or eating for days after, and made you jump at any loud noise. The only planes in the air above NY were fighter planes on combat air patrol.
Those feelings only come from being there. The rest of the nation can try to appreciate the pain..but unless people are directly affected, they can only guess at what it was like..
Sometimes I think it's the smell of that day that sets people 'apart,' if you will. That smell is unforgettable and for those who smelled the combination of burning building and bodies and lived under the tower of soot that rained down for almost three days, it brings the whole sequence of events down to the cellular and molecular level. It's an added dimension that people from far away are unable to connect with, and personally, I wouldn't want anyone to have to smell that smell again. Ever.
On the whole though, it was an event that affected people worldwide, there's no doubt about that one bit.
So I guess that means we can't feel badly for the pain we are inflicting on Iraqis because we aren't there? Or we can't feel badly for the people whose live were devastated by the tsunami? I think people should be allowed to feel how they want about incidents that are as horrible as 9/11. I'm not going to begrudge someone from Idaho the ability to be horrified just because they weren't with me walking uptown away from the fires that day. We should be outraged at people like President Bush who appropriate the day for their own personal agendas. Every American was affected in some way by 9/11. We may have been there personally, but that doesn't doesn't change the fact that it was an attack on a way of life. We are New Yorkers, not martyrs.
i still get anxious when i hear a firetruck with its horns blaring down the block. For whatever reason, i always feel compelled to check the news to see if we're under attack everytime i hear a firetruck. one of my most vivid memories of that day was hearing the constant drone of firetrucks screaming down the block from every direction. still gives me the shivers....
I was here that day, saw the trade center come down and have no use for whiners anymore. We've mourned enough and yes, I would work in the new towers going up.
It's definately a different experience being in lower Manhattan that day and the days following, but to wear that as a badge of honor is kind of sick.
Too much of this smacks of New Yorkers' constant need to elevate themselves above everyone else.
If you weren't in the WTC or know someone that died then you really need to get over yourself.
martyr:
A-h** who by force and murder takes over ,and then fly’s airliner full of innocent people in to an office building full of innocent people..
Having not been here, I could never say. Everyone is connected in the tragedy, and the closeness to the event seems circumstantial. Though not here, I was on my way to catch a flight to LA. I had just moved from Boston and could have been on that flight that struck the towers. Also, had I not deferred school, I would have been in NYC on that day.
I did choose to move here post-9.11 when NYC was still reeling economically. And I'll always have a kind of mutual respect for those of us who moved here in 2001 after the attack. I think we're united by refusing to fear.
Are New Yorkers basically a bunch of wimps?
How could they cope if they were in Ramadi--suicide car bombs, rocket-propelled grenades, automatic weapons.... And we're talking about attacks that are 24/7 here.
j described the vibe here that Fall very well, but for me it gave me the opposite type of perspective. All that mourning around me that Fall was a constant reminder of the difference between a witness (even a very close witness) and a participant. I think it's a throwback to the country's Puritan roots that everyone seems to hanker for suffering.
I agree with the post above of how some are using the fact that they live NEAR GZ that it's a red badge of courage of some type.
I don't need to tell people I lived through it. And, why should I?
While I do I think it's pointless to argue if someone "gets it" or not, IMO, I think that people do feel it differently when it happens to you in your own city vs. seeing it on TV.
Personally, while I sympathized with the families of victims of the Oklahoma Bombing, it was only on 9/11 that I experienced the anxiety of not knowing about friends and family.
Could Gothamist please not post images of the towers burning or collasping where they're easy to stumble upon. They freak me out too much and caused me to avoid TV for a long time. And am having to do that again now.
i think about 9/11 everyday... something i remember that i will never forget:
rescue teams from all over the united states drove their fire trucks and police cars from their cities and towns to help us new yorkers, i remember seeing a firetruck from alaska, that meant a lot to me. they were the ambassadors of the american people who were not here and did not experience the devestation first hand.
i remember seeing european, austalian, israeli, japanese, chinese, egyptian etc. medics and rescue teams all helping us out.
Are Earthlings basically a bunch of wimps?
How could they cope if they were on Pluto--photon bombs, warpdrive-propelled grenades, weapons set to kill (not stun).... And we're talking about attacks that are 153.12/7 here.
I was here, but damn if I'm not really weary of the "five years later" saturation going on. I just want to get on with life, and I don't think spending a whole week picking over every aspect of that day is very healthy.
That smell.
The people who suffered most were passengers on the planes, workers in the buildings, family and friends of the victims, rescuers who risked their lives to help. Comparing our pain shouldn't be an issue.
Just because it's worse somewhere else doesn't mean New Yorkers don't have a right to feel traumatized by 9/11.
For example, if your mother died, I could say "Oh yeah, well you are a wimp for feeling that. I have a friend whose mother AND father died in a fire, and days later got diagnosed with cancer and he has three months to live."
Then another could chime in: "My whole village downed, and I got my legs cut off by a falling tree, and I have only ONE month left to live."
You could keep going and going. Someone is always suffering more. But it doesn't mean we haven't suffered.
I remember how NYC went back to it's underhanded racism 6 months after 9/11.
I remember when it was there were no yellow ribbons or flags on SUV's.
I remember when 9/11 was not equated with being "American". (racism does)
There are so many things that we all opine on that we haven't experienced first-hand. So many liberal New Yorkers blast the President about the war and its attendant destruction of Iraqi civilians and U.S. troops (as they should), yet very few of them have somebody close to them in the armed services. We all felt horrible about the Oklahoma bombing, but very few of us is actually from there. Compassion shouldn't be geographically restricted.
Also, i think if you lived downtown and saw the corrpution of LMDC, abuses of power (cops on the street for almost a year, streets closed), the Air Conditioning scandals, the legitimate businesses collapse, the nefarious businesses suck up the "aid" money, you have the right and the responsibility to be way, way, way more bitter than anyone suspects we should be.
Some people upstate asked me after 911, "how are you all doing down there...it is too bad that it happened to you all..."
...as if it did not include them and the rest of the country.
There are many people who do see what happened more as an isolated event. Just another entry in the news or a "Hollywood movie action scene."
And believe me they are glad because analytically speaking, it was tramatic.
I'm not sure it's really about a feeling of superiority for having been here that day, but there's definitely no debate that people outside of Manhattan will never understand exactly how it felt (hopefully). The sparkling blue skies, the fighter jets, the sirens, that chalky sweet burnt smell, walking home over bridges with hundreds of thousands of other people in complete shock. You can see it on TV all you want and say you get it, but I can still cleary feel it all unfolding around me.
And I remember talking to friends all over the country over the next several days, and finding the biggest difference was that they were all so angry- and everyone here was just sad.
People that weren't here at the time seem to have a more melodramatic reaction than people that were. Maybe the creepy overwraught way that cable TV news channels interpret events molds peoples interpretations and emotive reflexes.
i can agree that the pain is different. When you hear someone you don't know got stabbed, you say to yourself "how tragic! horrible!..." and so forth, but when your neighbor is stabbed, it hits closer to home and there is more reaction and more emotion attached to it.
It will never be the same, the pain to experience something firsthand or see it so closely and, the pain of seeing it from far away. However, that doesn't mean that makes both feelings any less significant...pain is pain, no matter who feels it. What we should work towards is healing and helping.
This goes to problems world-wide as well.
It's not so much about having been here when the actual attack took place that morning, I think it's more of a matter of who was here in the days that followed. That is not a auperficial pride. The feeling in the city then was beyond belief, and you had to be here to know it.
From Samantha T:
Samantha, I'm somewhat conservative in my views, Seriously disagree with GW's "Handling" of the War on Terror and Iraq (Two separate wars, IMO) so you could say I'm "Blasting" him and have family there now. Does that make my critique of GW more valid?
9/11 and Iraq are two separate issues as far as I'm concerned. IMO, 9/11 was the Excuse GW used to go into Iraq. Speaking for myself, my Compassion isn't geographically restricted, I just didn't experience what Oklahoma felt until 9/11.
I Have no doubt that most people sympathize with us for 9/11.
I
I lived through it, never saw video images of it. I can't entirely explain why but I never wanted to see the video. I couldn't avoid seeing still photos, but I did avoid seeing video. Then one night, I saw the movie "The Barbarian Invasions," about a man who is on his deathbed in Canada, and it randomly included footage of the towers burning and collapsing. I felt like I had been punched in the gut and I immediately flashed back to the solid blank air, not being able to see anything outside the window, having my lungs filled & coughing & coughing & coughing. But that experience with that random movie helped me accept that I'm going to see the images everywhere in the media. Seemingly forever. I think the difference is that anyone could feel fear when they see those images, but only some will instantly feel like they are smelling that smell or coughing that hopeless wheezing cough (or wonder whether they will die earlier than they would have naturally from the poisons they breathed in).
Yeah... the smell.
But more than that... the sound. The way the ground shook (in Brooklyn!) when the towers fell. The look of panic on the woman's face when a plane went over the Heights later. The way the thunderstorm woke me up a couple of nights later with the thought that thunder sounds like a building falling.
And the screams.
When people from out of town remark how bad it looked, I always say "it sounded even worse."
PS: I love the quote from Ms. North Carolina: "... which bystander is allowed to be more upset, the New Yorker or the American." Umm, excuse me, Tar Heel Honey, but aren't they the same thing? What about the "we are all NYers" sentiment. One thing that seperates NYers from other Americans is attitudes like that.
What is Tar Heel Honey? Are you from Mayberry, NC? You sound like a hick. Sorry North Carolinians, didn't mean to insult you with the second question. I should have asked the blogger where they purchased their small town lingo and mentality. No need to answer in regards to "Tar Heel Honey." I'll go to the wikipedia.
As for me, I was born and raised in NYC and then was in my second year of college near Boston when it happened. I got up for class, turned on the TV and saw the towers fall.
It was a strange combination of wishing I were there and being utterly grateful that I wasn't. A lot of guilt mixed with a lot of frustration. Now that this health crisis has emerged in the wake of the disaster, I'm leaning towards gratitude. But I'll always remember that helpless feeling.
I wasn't in the city that day, and I didn't live in the city then, but I still feel like I felt it more than the average American, even having only seen it on tv.
Those of us in the suburbs of NYC still had the panic of not knowing where our loved ones were, we still heard the fire trucks leaving to go help, we heard the fighter jets. We still felt that we very well could have been there, and that it was an attack on us as well. In the days and weeks following there were still the cars in our train station parking lots that no one was coming back to.
Absolutely not the same as having been there, but closer than most seem to realize. When people from out of town ask if I was there that day, and I answer that I wasn't, they act as if I was completely disconnected.
Really it's ridiculous to try and quantify grief. Every single experience was different and it's pointless and rude to tell people they don't have a right to feel something.
funny, I was in NC when they fell. I was on a plane ready to take off, boarding was at 8:55am. Sat on the tarmac for a while then were told to de-plane.
Called up my bro and told him to pick me up and I'll be extending my vacation.
Don't knock the tar heel state, each and everyone of his friends and co-workers were very concerned about us. We were the only NY'ers they knew.
As to my family back home, they had it worse. They saw everything outside their window. Thank goodness we have a place away from the city where we could go for a week. Other's were not so fortunate and had to either tough it out in the dust or find a friend to stay with.
I'd like to say this is a stupid debate, but it reminds me of the episode of "Rescue Me" in which a NYFD firefighter in a grief counseling group berated its other members when he found out that they were nowhere near the WTC on 9/11. He had a legit point. There are differing levels of trauma associated with horrific events. Nonetheless, on a trip to Hawaii I was extremely moved visiting the USS Arizona and get very upset visiting the Vietnam Memorial Wall in DC. My connection to both of them is nothing other than being an American and a human being. I like the fact that visitors come to see the hole at Ground Zero. Given the city's incompetence at building a true memorial, it is the only avenue for paying tribute to the thousands who died there.
And that smell will haunt me for the rest of my life.
I moved to Indiana last year so this will be my second 9/11 anniversary outside of New York and I can tell you the feeling here is definitely different. There was a depressing, dark vibe that comes over NYC in the days before the anniversary and as bad as it is, at least I was able to know I was around people who felt as dark as I did. Here, there may be some TV coverage but other than that, it's just a normal day.
I'm glad I'm not there but I also wish I was, going to work at my old job in the Financial Center and just being around people who understand why it's something I still haven't been able to get over.
I agree that it's pointless to take a superior stance based on one's level of experience. And of course we can feel compassion for anyone, anywhere - in fact, compassion is often best felt from a distance, but that's another discussion.
What irked me in the year or so afterwards was the way the event was picked up and fetishized by people nowhere near New York or Washington DC. My husband and I drove through the Olympic Peninsula in the Pacific Northwest, and more than once, in towns that barely had half a stoplight to their names, I saw huge signs outside of businesses proclaiming things like "9/11 - Kill Em All - Let God Sort Em Out - Never Forget That Day". The people who exhibit these sentiments weren't here, and many of them actively profess to hate New York City, so they'd never come here. They had no right to claim this event as their latest excuse for racism and idiotic signage.
And now, five years later, I am tired of the ongoing fetishization of 9/11. It was a horrible day and a world-changing event. It was a blow, but it was a blow to a rich country that continues to be rich, materially and in other ways. We were very fortunate in that we were able to spring into action and care for one another, on a citywide level, and personally. We have mostly bounced back. It wasn't the end of the world. I don't fault those who directly experienced it (through loss or proximity) for still being traumatized, but as for the rest of us, I don't think that's a state we can claim. It's time for those of us who merely had to walk home and feel horrible to move on. It was a terrible event, and since then, many more terrible events have occurred, from genocides to invasions to the near-loss of America's other great city.
The thing I will take away from the event, however, is that now I truly love New Yorkers. I grew up here, but I never really had occasion to think about just how great the citizens of this place are. You just can't knock 'em down.
i think what it comes down to is that everyone's perspective is different.
we are all survivors, regardless of whether we were 50 feet away or 50,000 miles
To show how far this provincialist instinct can go, let me share this. When it happened, I rushed downtown on foot to check on a friend who worked near the WTC. After hours of terrifying uncertainty, I found her with her dust-encrusted clothes in a heap and we watched the fires from her roof on Orchard St. Without an ounce of adrenaline in my body later that night, I trudged back up to Yorkville on the UES. I walked up 2nd Ave and kept passing restaurants packed full of people eating dinner on the sidewalk. Everything seemed completely normal. I wanted to scream at them "What are you doing? Don't you know what's happening down there? There's army humvees parked on Houston St.! The Twin Towers are GONE!" If you want to incrementalize grief and rememberance by geographical distance, you may as well do it by miles, feet, and inches. I don't see the point though.
The next weekend I drove about 100 miles up to Hudson, NY and listening to a local radio station I heard a constant stream of solicitations for boots, clothing, water, and other supplies for rescue workers. We were all in it together, no matter how far I drove.
Dave H.,
You're quite right. I happened to be out of town on 9/11, but when I saw the smoking towers and later the clouds of dust, it was like my heart was being torn out. Whether I was there or not, that was my city under attack. And then you realize that the entire nation was locked down. People who were here at the time don't have the monopoly on fear, grief and anguish. To this day, I can't watch footage from 9/11 without having to fight the shudders. It's just sadly predictable that thanks to human nature, we would progress from "We're all in this together, we're all New Yorkers at heart" to "Hey, you weren't there so you know nothing."
I was in Queens at work when 911 happened. I remember we did not know what was going on. We all thought that a "small" plane had hit something. The smoke was so small in volume looking in from Astoria Queens. We thought it was a minor event.
My point is this; most people that were not in the immediate area had to get all information from the news stations.
So in essence, everyone, including New York City people of ever burough and New Jersey people, that were not in the immediate area are no different then anyone else experiencing it from the television or another state. The only way New Yorkers knew the details was from TV. The major difference was that, New Yorkers, knew someone who had a relative or friend that worked there or in the area. Or most New Yorkers had just been in that same building last year or on the that block the day before. I think many New Yorkers felt lucky that it was not them because it was so close to home.
Most people who were "not there" (at the scene) IMAGINED how bad it was in the first moments; It wasn't until the first tower fell that people were visibly upset. Because it was only logical that it was rush hour and firemen would have been in the buildings, we knew something was terribly wrong. Someone had died. No person understood it to be terroism. It was all speculation. However, when the NEWs kept showing a second plane hit, it became increased speculation and sadness to think that it might be intentional. People (females)in my office cried spontaneously, not knowing who had died. We just knew that it was a bad moment in New York. Then later, to see hundreds of people walking because all train service was shut down was also sad. The entire day people walked from Manhattan; or into upper Manhattan; or the Bronx; and Brooklyn; and Staten Island. The New Jersey people had a very bad day for traveling.
in my opinion there is one distinct difference between people who were in nyc at the time and people who watched on tv or whatever- many people in nyc were genuinely scared for their lives or thought the world was basically ending. although americans everywhere were no doubt scared, new yorkers (at least more than people in other parts of the country) know what it is like to be in a war/terror zone. in some other countries this is too common, but in the united states i think new yorkers have a unique perspective
i was in high school at the time and although we didn't know at first what happened, we found out about 20min after the first plane hit and then we heard the fighter jets go overhead, etc. etc. when we were allowed to leave we saw hole, smoke, and ash where the towers used to be. all the while we were talking back and forth about who we knew in there, which country or terrorists did it, where the other hijacked planes were, and whether another bombing was going to happen that day. i usually don't talk about it or try to exert any privilege regarding my experience but the truth is that if you were in nyc that day, particularly manhattan, you were basically in a war zone and state of intense fear for a couple hours.
And now, five years later, I am tired of the ongoing fetishization of 9/11.
Leela, right on.
I also think it's pointless to argue superiority. Some were here, some weren't. No point in holding it against someone of they weren't (though people here did have to deal with a different types of physical and emotional stress). That said, I learned how humans have to adjust in the face of such a disaster. You can call me a pussy for not living in Bagdad, for instance, but we all adjust our survival instincts as needed (and you'd be amazed at the skills you may not know are inside you). I wasn't here for the blackout, but the transit strike was somewhat similar...everyone from vastly different backgrounds banding together.
Putting the superiority debate aside for a moment, I think I have kind of an idea where both sides (New Yorker and non-NY'er) are coming from, since I was in Manhattan on 9/11 but had just moved to the city a week ago as a new university student. Because I was there, I can understand why some city natives feel it's impossible for people who weren't there to understand *completely* what it was like, since (like others have mentioned) the sounds and probably most of all the SMELL are some of the most immediate memories that New Yorkers have of the day - in addition to small, mundane little things that would only occur to you if you were used to living in the city, like the way that all the streets below 14th Street were devoid of car traffic, and how disorienting it was to be able to stand in the middle of an intersection and have it be completely, totally empty. On the other hand, as an "outsider" to the whole thing, I can understand the fascination (to a certain degree) with the whole thing. For the same reason, I suppose, that some people are fascinated with Civil War battlefields or any other site where something of national/humanitarian significance has happened.
I think (after five years of living in the city) that the New Yorker part of me has kind of taken over and made me a little indifferent to a lot of the histrionics that surround 9/11-talk. But at the same time, I still can't watch footage of the burning towers without either immediately launching into tears or changing the channel. I think that's probably also from having lived in the city all this time - now that I've been here half a decade, I understand even better all that was lost that day. Effing sad shit.
I was in New York when 911 took place. I was not afraid for my life. Maybe it is my military training. I know the difference between the front line and being out of weapons range. I remember the former terroist attack (90's) in the same location. All I could think of was, how could the leaders of the state allow this to happen on their watch. They were not organized at all. I was mad and angry. I felt that day that they could have had more anticipation. I knew that it was something very terrible and bigger then what New York was used to. Meaning it was far bigger then the daily crime issues. Since it had happened before, I thought, oh no here we go again.
Scenario: When a person makes a threat, follows thru on it, and half way succeeds on it, they will try until they get it right. (Look at how a bully in school operates) Especially, if their motivation is hate. The 911 attack was an attempt to get right what terrorist have been trying to do for a long time. 911 could not have been an isolated event of this type in the USA. I was mad then and I am mad now that it was allowed to happen and the city is allowing it again. It is only a matter of time because homeland security funding has been spent on everything except security.
I don't recall having much faith in the local governments ability to deal with it. They did not seem very organized. They behaved like they were in the dark about why they would have been a target. They behaved like a football team that had no quarterback or halfback. There was no "game planning." They were "sacked." It was like a permenant tackle.
The city is still not ready.
I was on the (N) train on my way back uptown to work when the towers were hit . When I got to the office that's when I foundout what had happened. It sickened me to see those building burning and the thought that all of those poor people on the upper floors had no chance to escape . Then thinking that if I had of stayed there a little longer that would have been me. Has it changed my view of the city below (14 St.) Yes without a doubt. It's tragic what happened on that faithfull day and all, But I think about what happening now . Our elected knuckleheads can't seem to decide what should be put their in that empty space. All they want to do is bitch and complain about the dumbest things! This isn't progress, It's stagnation is what it is ! It's just sad to see what happens when money clouts the judgement of those responsible for the rebuilding of whatever they plan to build there .
I am very scared when i hear an airplane go by my house. I a newer to sure how to react.
I am not sure if it is some on who will do some thing bad again or if it is some one who is just comming home from their vacation.
As someone who got caught in the cloud from the south tower, I'd like to mention: the graphic design firm that blew up on W 19 St about a month later. Feeling the ground shake, and running outside, trying to find out what happened. The smoke bellowing down 19 St, people talking about a fireball. And most especially, the cop directing traffic who saw us moving towards the intersection, and screamed "What are you doing? Get back! We don't know what it is!!" I'll never forget the fear in his voice. It reinforced a feeling that anything could blow up, at any time.