<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: The FAA Wants Millions of More Folks At La Guardia</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php</link>
<description>All comments for The FAA Wants Millions of More Folks At La Guardia</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Oddree</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323914</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323914</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:41:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Whether LGA allows for more planes or more seats, what first must be attended to is how the airport deals with the additional luggage.
My boyfriend - a touring musician - and I flew out of LGA this weekend, going to Dallas.  My boyfriend commented that he has NEVER seen such long lines and chaos at the self-service check-in stations; we realized that this is the result of passengers checking bags once again.  The desk agents were completely inundated with luggage and questions (rendering the &quot;self-service&quot; element completely useless).
Upon returning to LGA, we and our fellow passengers had to wait for an hour at the baggage claim area.  There were only two active belts; there were at least 3 flights designated to each belt.  Despite the increase in luggage volume, I am sure the airports have not hired more baggage handlers, as a couple of new bags appeared on the belt only every ten to fifteen minutes.  We were fortunate enough to have our luggage come sooner rather than later; there were a couple hundred people still searching for their bags by the time we left.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>flight stewardess fan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323820</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323820</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:24:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I love flying in those smaller jets and turboprops.
Until, I just read today a Comair commuter jet just crashed after take off in Kentucky. Plane was intact but on fire. Believed to have one survivor, 47 may have died.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sean  </title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323767</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-323767</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:44:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What I don&apos;t understand is the Port Authority rule barring flights longer than 1500 miles from LGA, arguably to divert more traffic to Newark and JFK. Shouldn&apos;t the market determine what flights fly from where??

(Also, the article says that planes as big as 767&apos;s can fly out of LGA. I assume that&apos;s the biggest plane that can use LGA&apos;s shorter runways, but then again, those are the planes that are regularly used to fly to LA anyway.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fuat</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-322468</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/08/26/the_faa_wants_m.php#comment-322468</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:08:29 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought LGA&apos;s runways were relatively short and couldn&apos;t accomodate some of the bigger planes.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>