Update: Oreo, Dog Thrown Off Building, Was Euthanized
People Wait For Tomorrow's UWS Apple Store Opening
Emily and Sarah Kunstler, Filmmakers
Cheap Chicken Wing Deal Ruined by Gunslinging Teens
FIT Students Busted For Drug Dealing Get Probation
-- The city has seized control of the BAM Cultural District in Fort Greene. After their huge successes in the WTC, West Side Rail, and Brooklyn Yards projects, what could go wrong?
-- Did you know that Ocean Parkway was the first bike path in America? It's getting a facelift this year.
-- But wait, there's more: Ron Popeil's Biography episode is on tonight!
-- Shaolin's Mid-Island team is going to the Little League World Series.
-- New York Mag has some moving still-life photos from the WTC wreckage, and the Times has a nice gallery of summer shots from the city's pools.
-- "Hey clown, watch where you're driving that thing!"
-- We are in favor of any game in which "stray balls occasionally pummeled unaware hipsters."
-- Urbanists debate: will closing Mott Street to cars be good or bad for local businesses?
-- Holy schlamoli, the College Humor kids are rich, bitch! It's not Girls Gone Wild money, but still!
LES kids throwing gang signs from Tangentialism on Flickr.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Re: Closing Mott Street
Why does it have to be all or nothing? What if they did a one week or one month or all Summer Experiment?
We should be willing trying stuff out, collecting data, seeing what problems really arise, before we completely dismiss a new idea. Closing a street to traffic is no irreversible.
Closing a street is hardly "radical", as it's done all over the world, usually successfully. It's only in NYC, where we've completely lost leadership in urban/transportation planning, is it treated as novel. Other global cities are beginning to take back their streets from the car -- we've got a lot of catching up to do.
Future Criminals of New York. Half these kids will be in rikers before they are 16.
Of course no day can be completed without those trademark pattiecake racist comments.....
OMG -- Shake Shack Trouble
http://eater.curbed.com/archives/2006/08/shake_shack_fai.php
There's really very little reason for anyone to drive on Bayard or the sub-Canal side of Mott in the first place, except to park. Both streets could really use the space for foot traffic instead. As a local worker and constant purveyor of stores on both streets (Though admittedly, not as a driver), I'd love to see the two streets closed to traffic.
Double Douce Nigga!! Yeah yeah!
Check out how the middle kid is all serious....yeah, we have a prison cell waiting for you when you hit puberty.
CLIMAX - I don't see how it's racist to say these kids look like a bunch of future criminals. They are already emulating a criminal lifestyle--why is it racist to assume that they will continue down the same path?
Which kid?
The one who looks like a suicide bomber in the green bandana making the CRIPS sign?
5 poppin, 6 droppin PIRU ST BLOOD 4 LIFE!!!
not every kid of color throwing gang signs is from the Lower East Side. the flickr caption says williamsburg.
Shouldn't the NYPD bust these little hoodlums before they off someone in a couple of years, which they will! Preventive justice is the only way to go, flash a gang sign and off to the Big Pen. And I agree with #3 that most of these punks will be rotting in jail before they are 18 anyway.
Also it's time for the NYPD to go in and take back McCarren from these unwashed, no talent hipsters. Throw them in jail with those would be gangsters!
m:
"take back their streets from the car"??
they were built FOR cars you tool.
jj- If you knew anything about history, you'd know that streets were not built for cars, especially in NYC. Most were built before the auto, and were highly multi-use: yes, for horse-drawn transportation, but also vending, children playing, neighbors meeting, etc. Look at any older picture of NYC streets and you will see a dizzying array of life, not just on the sidewalk, but IN the street. As the auto began to dominate, the City begin to enact policies that gave the streets to the car, like: traffic lights, inventing "jaywalking", moving kids from streets to newly-built playgrounds, widening streets, making them one way, building neighborhood-destroying expressways, etc.
So, before you call me a tool, try opening a book and learning something first.
#14 - What's your problem with cars and highways? Go live with the Amish if you can't stand the "traffic".
I can't stand people like you who are always complaining about how cars are destroying society, so go create your own "car free utopia" somewhere else. Have fun riding your rusty fixed gear bikes! LOL
m:
yeah, but you took all that time to type that out and correct a troll. still makes you a tool.
lol
sorry, dude, you don't deserve a response, because i don't think you have the requisite mental capacity to understand.
banning cars (esp. private cars) from any city street is a good idea.
the "utopian" theorist paul goodman explained why and how to do it decades ago:
http://www.bopsecrets.org/CF/goodman-cars.htm
and dude, sir, if you are so very interested in cars, perhaps a city isn't the place for you.
while plenty of perfectly good reasons for reducing car use in urban areas have been provided over the years, I have yet to ever hear a good reason for them.
Ooo, Mr."Let's close down Broadway for the bikes and kids" I was SOOO worry that you wouldn't respond to my post.
Better watch your back for right turning 18 wheelers when you ride your bike down those car streets.
"sorry, dude, you don't deserve a response"
that is a response. (rolling eyes)
So all the "dudes" are in agreement that m is a TOOL!
"Future Criminals of New York. Half these kids will be in rikers before they are 16."
I beg to differ. Only 1/3 of the kids will be in Rikers, another 1/3 would probably be 6ft under. Life's a bitch on the streets of Williamsburg just as long as those kids don't mess with the hipsters and the Hasids all is good.
The problem is that closing streets to traffic has been tried before and very often failed. The Times had an article a few years ago that told about all these pedestrian malls around the country that were being converted back into streets because they just did not live up to their promises.
Urbanist- actually, closing streets to traffic has been successful around the world, an in NYC - Fulton St in Downtown Manhattan in particular, comes to mind. NYC is different than most cities in that it already has a lively street life, and so if done right, street closings can significantly enhance quality of life, safety and economic vitality.
For more info on Fulton St, see:
http://www.nycsr.org/nyc/video-view.php?id=5
Besides Fulton, Mulberry is sometimes closed to traffic.
i assume everyones moed along here, but can any of the dudes give me a reason for cars? i ask this quite sincerely. there seems to be a lot of people that oppose the idea of a ban simply because. their opposition takes the shape of namecalling, but provides no backing. what benefits do private cars provide that can justify opposing a ban?
of course, this is the nature of those people only interested in the satus quo and comfort level that, stragely enough, doesn't seem to satisfy them enough to speak with confidence or real purpose.
I just don't have anything to say. Not that it matters. Eh. I've just been staying at home doing nothing, but I don't care. That's how it is.
I just don't have much to say recently. Such is life. I've basically been doing nothing. Basically nothing seems worth bothering with. Oh well.