Gothamist: Asians Targeted in Queens Hate Crime Attack

blade

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:15:52 -0500

well, putting race aside, this news would be alarming for any friends and family. i personally think these two fine american fools should be hung. not because they are "ethnic whites", just because this is indeed a hate crime. im an asian american and i would have... well lets say i would dispatch these fools... FAST. putting that aside... those who do not understand the frustration of being on the other end of hate crimes are usually the ones instigating and or participating in them.

Dawkins

Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:22:35 -0500

thats messed up, Reynold happens to be one of my close friends when we were kids, we went to the same school in the mid 90s and to see this happen, i actually kinda saw it coming, cuz hes a guy who would stand up for himself, thats why he said he got more angry

bk

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:36:58 -0500

the whites who are selling are happy the asians are bidding and buying up homes in the nabe (bensonhurt, bay ridge) the ones that didn't sell to move to SI are either holding out or are pissed off w/ the fongs + chans

regarding henri

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:24:55 -0500

No, this is not a jury so stop trying to change views. and second, the answer is still no, they would not of rammed and rear ended a white boy's car then search for them to use their heads as a little league batting tee. What part of "you don't belong here" don't you people get? Isn't that the Klan's slogan?

Henry

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:43:58 -0500

First of all, im FOR on how some crimes can be categorized when theres a racial motivation involved. It is not the cursing and racial slurs that makes a crime a hate crime. It is the targeting of a specific racial group that makes it a crime. So the white guys in the case are out to cause some trouble. The question is, would they do the same to some white guys instead of asians? If they went out specifically to look for races they feel inferior to them to beat up, I think they should definitely be punished more severely. If such actions are not more controlled, society's discrimination will only become stronger. And so whether to have them convicted for hate crimes is trial's problem. Obviously the racial slurs used in the case can be used for some sort of evidence. It just depends on how the prosecutor makes it seem like a racial motivation was involved. So why should they be punished more for hate crimes? Well... if you're asian, how would it feel if there's a white group out there looking for anybody to beat up or a white group out there looking for only asians to beat up? There's a difference; it's like... your freedom of identity is being violated when you get beat up. I hope that I was as objective as possible in giving out my view and that it may change other people's views.

commonsense

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:23:07 -0500

Regarding the "a crime is a crime" point of view, I ask why do we have 1st degree murder, 2nd degree murder, man-slaughter, etc. That's because motive DOES matter. While I agree these racists were not computing their would be sentences at the time of the attack, charging them with a hate crime does send a clear signal that racism is not accepted behavior.

whatever

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:09:35 -0500

Lots of stupid remarks. Good guess is that there are a lot of pre-teens commenting--seems like that kind of juvenile, silly response.

tom

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:19:32 -0500

Good thing Tien Mao didn't cover this story otherwise he'd call the asian kids "idiots of the month" for being out on the road at 2:30am.

ken

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:50:23 -0500

oh, and also, the nerve of the police to try to prevent teenagers like Brown and Heavey from defending their neighborhood? since when is the police the people to defend a neighborhood?

ken

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:46:54 -0500

hey kill whitey, good to hear from you again! hey, just to let you know, we're going to meet up tonight at the usual spot behind the 7-11 on Bell Blvd and plan on how we can continue to "defend our neighborhood." don't ask me who we're defending it against because it might distract me from thinking of new naughty words. i want a larger emotional payload this time. ok, see you tonight. remember, defend america.

young chuck norris

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:41:45 -0500

Only one group was looking for a fight. The whites rammed the lexus then found them parked and proceeded to take batting practice with an auto security device. No politics involved, just plain racist hate. How is that so difficult to understand? Did anyone watch the history of the KKK yesterday on the History channel?

Lexus

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:27:57 -0500

badasiandrivers, are you mad that the Lexus these kids were driving is worth more than your life?

Kill Whitey

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:14:47 -0500

I don't think that uttering racial epiphets is inherently racist, I think it's become a class signifier, a signal that you haven't had much education the same way that cuss words were fifty years ago. Therefore the creation of nebulous categories like hate crime worries me, as they make it too easy for a third-party to put pressure on a judicial system; spinning a case a certain way to further their own agendas. This is why the 125th street murder or that woman getting shot in LES in front of her pistol-whipped boyfriend last year weren't declared hate crime, despite clear evidence of racial motivation. Besides, calling, for example, a Korean, a gook or a slant has a much bigger emotional payload- it just feels naughtier to say- and if you're in the middle of a fight, wouldn't you subconsciously reach for the words that were most likely to inflict shock and awe on your opponent? I figure both groups of kids were assholes out looking for a fight. First degree assault is a pretty serious conviction already, why do we need to have additional penaltlies for hate crimes? It just resonates with too much creepy politics.

Just Bob

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:48:25 -0500

A crime is a crime is a crime, sure - but if it had been four white guys driving in the Lexus, I guarantee this wouldn't have happened. Those two idiots in the pickup would have just driven along and there would have been no crime committed. And that is why this should be considered a hate crime and why there's a need for this type of legislation.

Korean guy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:46:54 -0500

"that group of kids who chased the NYU student into traffic on 125st street while chanting "kill whitey, kill whitey"" How is this not a hate crime? "a teenager who defends his neighborhood, but happens to utter a racial epiphet...in the process gets fifteen years in jail and is publically vilified." Ignorance is bliss? The guy was driving in a car with 3 other people. How does that constitute "defending his neighborhood"? Thats like saying "get out of my country" to any asian people you meet then claiming you're defending America when you punch them in the face. BTW if you "happen to utter a racial epiphet" theres a good chance you're a RACIST. Hence the whole Hate Crime thing.

Jason McElroy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:44:40 -0500

James said: >I don't think you'd get it though. >Somehow I get the feeling that you've >jumped on the "whites are being victimized" >bandwagon. I suggest you give THAT a break. Nope. I'm not a racist. Thanks for the presumption though. I'm just trying to understand the rationale behind a set of laws whose only possible outcome could be the further segregation and polarization of different factions of people. Equality won't happen until people are treated equally.

badasiandrivers

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:36:03 -0500

Anyone stop to think that these kids were just mad at a carload of bad asian drivers??? Who knows, they might have cut them off or driven 25 in the left lane with their blinker on. Asians should stick to public transportation.

bah

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:30:08 -0500

hr .. please go kill yourself now... thanks.. don't wonder too hard why ppl around you hate you.

Kill Whitey

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:28:00 -0500

Does anyone remember whether or not that group of kids who chased the NYU student into traffic on 125st street while chanting "kill whitey, kill whitey" were charged with a hate crime? Or were they even caught at all? Since the story broke, I haven't heard anything at all about it, though I continue to hear about the 'ethnic whites' in Howard Beach who beat up that admitted car thief and got fifteen years in prison, even though their victim is walking. To me it doesn't seem fair that rapists and attempted murderers get less than ten years in jail for heinous, life destroying crimes, but a teenager who defends his neighborhood, but happens to utter a racial epiphet- never mind that racial epiphets seem to be the 21st century equivalent of cuss-words - in the process gets fifteen years in jail and is publically vilified.

hr

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:14:04 -0500

me chinese, me play joke. me put pee-pee in your coke. lol

seriously

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:06:09 -0500

Ok K, you know what you are. just know that adding, "I'm Asian," or "I'm Chinese," doesn't make your "unbiased" point any stronger.

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:51:07 -0500

#58, wheres that technology that shows you the face of someone posting over the internet? i'd like to invest in that. you don't know me. stop assuming.

seriously

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:42:28 -0500

K, you're not Asian. Please stop that.

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:42:14 -0500

rp, that was very well put. and i can agree with your last point that it is very tricky, which is my biggest concern with hate crime legislation.

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:34:25 -0500

hey, im asian and i still think hate crime legislation is ridiculous. And do you honestly believe that legislation is what prevent would-be criminals from doing their thing? i think its the fear of getting caught (and then the legislation) that prevents most crimes from happening. in the heat of the moment you're not thinking "if i do this, i'll get 15 years in prison", you're thinking "if i get caught, i'll get 15 years in prison", or sometimes, you're just thinking..."i wanna beat the crap outta this guy for no apparent reason"

rp

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:33:35 -0500

I think some of the commenters here are dancing around a common point: racism is bad, and a racially-motivated crime is decidedly ugly. But crime is also ugly. K seems to be indicating that the distinction is problematic, among others - i.e., who is to say that beating someone up while yelling an ethnic (or homophobic, or misogynistic, et al, as hate crime laws encompass) slur is definitively worse than beating someone up for another ignorant, stupid reason - say, the dog-shitting-on-lawn excuse? What worries me about hate crime is not what it's meant to protect and prevent - amen to that. There have been some disgusting crimes in the past few years, and all evidence points to color or sexuality-based hatred as key motivators. But as Sarah Silverman (really?) posted, as un-PC as it may seem, anybody with a generally liberal attitude should be wary. Not all words convey the speaker's real beliefs OR intentions - and last time I checked, bigots are still allowed to be bigots. It's a constitutional right, like it or not; freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, et al. On the other hand, if there's compelling evidence that "hate" as it's being defined by this kind of legislation is the lone agitator in a violent situation, I don't mind sticking it to the criminal in question as a result. Laws like this are meant to prevent hate-based crime - the notion that the types of gangs one commenter described might decide NOT to beat someone up if they consider the consequences they'll face, being that they're openly intolerant. All this is to say that hate legislation, if tricky, can be a just thing in the right hands. We have to trust that a good jury will recall the principle of reasonable doubt - as will the judge, when sentencing a criminal.

A

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:26:32 -0500

If you're white, how would you feel if you get a position in, say, China ... and one day, you find out that a few Chinese kids decide to smash your son's skull and crack all his teeth while preaching, "You want more, you f*in white trash! Get the hell out of my land!" just because he's white. You wouldn't think "hate crime" legislation is at least one step the government can take to prevent such gratuitous violence?

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:21:03 -0500

#52, so should someone who goes out beating up on people for fun should get a lesser sentence than someone who beats up a person because of the color of their skin? what is so different about the two? its still a pretty effed up thing to do no matter how you look at it.

Kojak

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:15:34 -0500

"...just because they yelled out some racial slurs" Motivation in committing a crime has a profound impact on how that crime is charged and sentenced and is not just limited to hate crimes. It can very well be the difference between 3rd and 1st degree murder. Im sure there are examples, but I’m not the law.

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:07:34 -0500

my problem is with the system of harsher penalties for hate crimes. point is, why should these two kids get a stiffer sentence just because they yelled out some racial slurs? so next time i want to go beat up a white guy or something, as long as i don't call him a cracker i'll get a lighter sentence? its ridiculous. a crime is a crime. they deserve the same punishment.

Jeff Foxworthy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:05:42 -0500

If you spend a lot of time complaining about hipsters on the internet, you just might be a redneck.

seriously

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:05:24 -0500

#34, my point is not to make a person feel better about his/her childhood but that the hate crime legislation exists partly to remedy societal wrong evident in recent American history. The fact that a group of white teenagers confronts an Asian-American or a black kid just because of the kid's race illustrates that the group of white of teenagers either find it acceptable in their little world to feel superior to the kid or that they have parents who teach them to hate. Btw, you're not Chinese.

perry mason jar

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:01:06 -0500

Jeez, K you went from beating someone senseless to now saying a racial slur? did you read ethos #39's post?

bakgaaua

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:52:54 -0500

so help me out, if i want to insult an ethic whitey i cannot say yo stupid red neck i have to say you stupid backass white trash?

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:50:48 -0500

#36, have you ever gotten into an argument with someone you despised? have you never started throwing hateful words around to degrade the person? thats what i believe racist words are...just words thrown around to dehumanize and degrade another person. it certainly does not automatically classify a crime as a *hate* crime.

ding

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:47:24 -0500

I think of the reasons behind hate crime legislation is that it would add on more years than if the perpetuator was accused of just a misdemeanor, or public disorderliness, or assault, or whatever it is. It's to make sure that those people don't get off easy for attacking someone for an intrinsic quality that he or she can't change. And Perry, the "special treatment" you talk about applies to whites and people in the majority culture as well. JJ, you are an offensive idiot. And no, not offensive to just the "PC" crowd. I think the most complaining in this country comes from white males and I'm damn tired of it!

almost infamous

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:46:26 -0500

Good explanation, infamous. Notice those "whites" you mentioned also didn't speak any English. Some still don't. I don't see any bitching and whining of that in Brighton Beach, parts of Williamsburg, etc. I'd like to add in Hipsters and transplants from the mid west, your michigans and parts west of Pittsburgh.

infamous

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:42:35 -0500

"You guys have to understand some of the anger - seeing your home town becoming a strange new place because an insular culture has taken hold. and as much as I likes the other cultures, there some pretty inward cultures around there." Like the cultish upwardly-mobile Middle American white people in stupid clothes that have invaded Brooklyn? Can they be beaten next? I hate recent immigrants. And their indie rock. I 'understand some of the anger',indeed!

Korean Guy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:36:06 -0500

Nobody is getting special treatment. Hate crime laws are designed to protect everyone. The reality of the situation is, however, that its mostly minorities who need this protection. A hate crime victimizes an entire race not a single person. Now every Asian person in Douglaston has to worry if they're next. If it was just one kid beating up another kid over a dispute, that would not be the case.

infamous

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:34:00 -0500

Ethnic whites = Irish, Italians, European Jews, and Poles. Basically, any European people that had to 'become white' in America after being harrassed, beaten, murdered or made to suffer egregious hate crimes back on the old continent. They used to be the majority of white people here in New York.....before it got invaded by hipsters!

34t9-ergk

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:26:23 -0500

You guys have to understand some of the anger - seeing your home town becoming a strange new place because an insular culture has taken hold. and as much as I likes the other cultures, there some pretty inward cultures around there. I mean, I've seen a lot of signs like: Chinese speaker only, or Korean speaker only. You can imagine why some of the less tolerant get really pissed about that, especially when they start to get excluded right in their own home. Such is life, eh?

ethos

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:20:15 -0500

"I've been called names just like every one else has.. Still doesn't give me the right to demand special treatment." There's a biiig difference btwn being called a name and having your life threatened and/or property destroyed b/c your race, religion or sex/sexual orientaion singled you out for that kind of "special treatment". Sorry you can't see that, hope you're never in that situation where you would. (Assuming you really are Chinese, which I kinda doubt.) And if you are ever in such a situation (heaven forbid), YOU certainly don't have to press charges as a hate crime if it offends you so damn much.

like her shows

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:17:03 -0500

Just like her shows, sarah silverman is uncomprehensible and played out.

sarah_silverman

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:10:37 -0500

"Gook"? WTF, since when isn't 'chink' good enough? 'Hate crime' - makes my stomach turn. Quick...call the thought police! You lefty douchebags should be up in arms over this, but that wouldn't be PC would it. Hypocritical assholes, you should all be sterilized and put to work in the mines.

Okay kay

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:11 -0500

K, YES. Beating someone up senseless while yelling slurs and this statement (paraphased) "get out of this neighborhood" "you don't belong here" "this is what we do to "blank"" definately deserves more punishment. I'm sorry you can't see that, maybe someday you will. I find it odd that beating someone out of boredom is even in your vocabulary.

non-ethnic white

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:04:31 -0500

Ethnic white is probably the new term to distinquish between the upper-class whites / yuppie upstarts and the working-class whites with accents who are pretty much gone from this region (thanks to Bloomberg's very vocal campaign to get rid of working people from NYC... yet he gets surprised when teachers can't afford to live here??). They mostly exist in Queens, NYS, SI, and the inner parts of New Jersey. Notable characteristics: wife-beaters, gelled up hair, names like Tony Giaccomi, Greg Jones, Bob Bobowksi, etc. No, there's a big difference between "working class" and "rednecks." I'd think it would be quite embarrassing to the working class when rednecks like these guys surface in their neighborhoods. A lot of them like to poke fun at how "backward" the rest od the country is, but in reality, rednecks are everywhere. Does this mean my mechanic, police officer, iron miner, and other working class relatives are also considered, "ethnic whites?" Or do you have to reside in the 5 boroughs to be eligible for such a special status? What they did was atrocious, no matter where they did it.

Perry

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:02:16 -0500

#30 - Laws dont exist to make people feel better about their childhood, they exist to provide a just and fair society to those who live in that society. And just like #29, i'm a chinese too. I've been called names just like every one else has.. Still doesn't give me the right to demand special treatment. Again, in regards to #13 - killing someone on accident is always a different class of crime than killing someone on purpose. Once you've decided to kill someone on purpose, what difference does it make whether you are deranged enough to kill because you don't like the color of their skin or the color of their clothes or the color of their car? They're a criminal all the same..

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:59:19 -0500

so beating someone senseless because they're a different color somehow warrants more punishment than beating someone senseless just because you're bored and have nothing better to do?

killer

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:58:09 -0500

These two "winners" have seriously fucked themselves: -assault -reckless endangerment -criminal mischief -all as hate crimes -resisting arrest -assaulting a police officer If convicted, they face up to 15 years in jail. Which means they'll be seeing a LOT more minorities... up their rectum.

Samantha T

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:50:28 -0500

Lest we forget that hate crimes protect white people, as well. They exist to prevent crimes directed at any person because of his or her race - the laws tend also to apply to gender, religion, sexuality, etc. There are lots of sound reasons why these laws exist - I really don't know why people are so against them. Enough with the cutesy "purple" and "green" people crap, too.

seriously

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:48:37 -0500

I agree with koreanguy. People who are annoyed by terms like "hate crime" have obviously not have had to face situations, during their childhood, where their parents are being cursed at and ridiculed by a group of white teenagers, where they are surrounded and beaten by a group of whites in a playground just for "being in their land," ... where in history lynching and ripping the organs of human beings is something that's done to "them" for talking to a white woman ... where driving around in a white suburb gives cops automatic just cause to search the vehicle and arrest ...

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:47:37 -0500

hey korean guy, i'm a chinese guy, and i still failed to see why a crime needs to be classified as a hate crime. a crime is a crim is a crime...

korean guy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:36:50 -0500

Its funny to see all these people, who are obviously not minorities, struggling to see why a hate crime is bad. Its easy not to understand racism when you never really face it in your life. When you can see yourself being chased because the color of your skin, get back to me.

nypeedee again?

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:34:42 -0500

Brown is the son of a retired NYPD officer and had a previous assualt incident. What is it with these "people"? What they have in common? First you have all these offsprings of cops doing this crap (think the other hate crime early this summer, linked in the gothamist post). and not to be outdone, the grandson of borough pres. oh, I know. see post number 10 by uhr...

korean guy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:34:32 -0500

former resident

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:25:01 -0500

I grew up in Little Neck in the 90's, and I remember a couple of local white gangs named, TMR ("The Master Race") and LNB ("Little Neck Boys"). I used to play baseball with a couple of guys in elementary school who eventually joined TMR, and, thereafter, we went out separate ways ... I went to high school and my two former friends did not. NY Times' article which tries to convey a theme of socio-economic disparity between whites and the Asian-American population in Eastern Queens does not, among other things, consider the najority of whites (esp. Jews), in these areas, who succeed and those Asian-Americans who do not fare well.

Don

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:07:08 -0500

Still waiting for a outraged press release to be issued by councilman John Liu. What's taking him so long??? (Just joshin'...I like the guy.)

get offit

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:17 -0500

Wrong, Paul. The two confronted the victims first by ramming their car into the victims. Then they followed them and proceeded to use their heads as a football on a tee. So, leave your stereotype out of this.

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:04:22 -0500

also wanted to add that yelling racial slurs while attacking someone doesn't make it a hate crime...

K

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:01:11 -0500

all crimes are pretty heinous, i don't think motive should determine sentencing

GR

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:00:42 -0500

I am curious as to why only two of the Asian teenagers were beaten when there were four occupants in the car. The NYTimes article referred to two Asians calling their cellphones for help. Were they the other people in the car? Or just bystanders?

Paul

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:59:55 -0500

Wow, a guy named Wing Chung Poon crashed his car in Queens. There's a shocker!! lol.

Kojak

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:54:50 -0500

Hate crime legislation may be ridiculous, but would you be against giving them a harsher sentence since it was racially motivated? I wouldn’t. Let them rot in jail for an extra few years.

whatever

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:53:56 -0500

Brown and Heavey sound like complete wackadoos. Where is the photo of the dynamic duo to help confirm my theory? My first thought was that I hope the cops test them for drug and/or alcohol abuse because it's difficult to believe that anyone could be that innately stupid.

James

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:51:12 -0500

Jason McElroy: No - a hate crime happens when purple guy breaks green guy's window, not because a dog shit in his yard, but because he's a green guy. Why the "special law," as you call it? Think about it this way. It's bad enough you're beating the crap out of someone, but how much more ridiculous is it if you're just beating the crap out of them for fun because they just happened to be a particular skin color and rolled into your neighborhood at the wrong place and at the wrong time. I don't think you'd get it though. Somehow I get the feeling that you've jumped on the "whites are being victimized" bandwagon. I suggest you give THAT a break.

dww

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:47:10 -0500

Yea the hate crime stuff is ridiculous. Thought crimes are the way this country is headed though. what happened Orwell? Things should not be this complicated. Kill or try to kill someone and you are locked away for life. How were these two perpetrators out on the street when they tried to run someone over last May? That's ridiculous.

boss tweedie

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:37:46 -0500

Again, jason, till your "kind" get's lynched, we'll call it even. So, leave your purple and green people out of it.

Mark

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:37:24 -0500

I'm no legal expert, but with regards to Jason McElroy's post, isn't attacking somebody because of their ethnicity / ethnic background, religion, sexuality, etc., a violation of their civil rights? I believe that it's intent in the same way that killing somebody accidentally in a car accident is vehicle manslaughter and killing somebody you know for a reason is flat-out murder. I agree, I don't know what the term "ethnic white" is supposed to refer to. Maybe non-Protestant Caucasians (e.g., Irish, Italians, Jews, etc.?).

specialj

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:34:27 -0500

so the white trash guys(ethnic whites) that beat up the asian guys for being asian were driving a toyota truck......perfect

ethos

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:28:14 -0500

Disgusting. Surprised (and a little disappointed)those fools didn't get a serious crack upside the head with the baton for resisting arrest. (Wow, you know it's a bad day when I actually wanna see some police brutality.) But it's a little encouraging to know there's still some brave folks willing to come forward & help out when it's needed. Seems like Chelsea area residents could take a cue from their Queens neighbors. Bury them UNDER the jail, I say.

uhr34ijtg

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:26:49 -0500

Jason McElroy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:23:43 -0500

I'm confused over the definition of "hate crime". Maybe someone can help me. Isn't punching someone in the head already illegal? I believe it's known as assault, a pretty serious offense. I would imagine it's almost always a demonstration of hate. Why the special law? Then end result is the same and should handled accordingly, who cares why it was done. If the attacker assaulted the victim because he didn't like the way he was driving it would be less of a crime? Ridiculous. Consider: You're a purple guy and your neighbor is a purple guy. You go over and break his window because his dog keeps shitting in your yard. Crime: damaging property. Your a purple guy and your neighbor is a green guy. Green guys are a special class of people who are protected by extra laws. You break his window because his dog keeps shitting in your yard. Crime: Hate crime? Give it a break.

black adder

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:23:26 -0500

and, you've added what to this post, mihow? Why don't you ask the Hugh Mo what "ethnic white" is?

J

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:20:29 -0500

Wing Chung Poon That is an excellent name.

Lefty

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:15:10 -0500

Damn Righties.... always messing with us Lefties... Wait a minute... They're White?? My mistake

mihow

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:14:52 -0500

"And, why should Jen not use Gothamist to post this? It's a news story. Go back to craigslist." "Yes, ethnic white is the new term for White Trash." Gothamist and its commenters are quite funny today. Seriously, though, what does "Ethnic White" mean?

etnic whitey

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:03:33 -0500

Yes, ethnic white is the new term for White Trash. Like Porn, you'll know them when you see them. Notice, the perps work as a Valet for a restaurant and an Alarm installer. I can see the Alarm guy's sales pitch, you need this alarm to keep the animals away.

humo guy

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:57:42 -0500

Hugh mo is lucky in that he probably has a license to carry. And, why should Jen not use Gothamist to post this? It's a news story. Go back to craigslist.

kristin

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:56:06 -0500

"Ethnic white"... interesting. that's a new term. Clearly a rank below the white with....no ethnicity?

jj

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:45:31 -0500

ok, we get it, you're asian. GOTHAMist should really rename itself to ASIANist.