
The hoopla over the new NYU dorm rising above St. Ann's Church we moaned about last week looks to be heating up. After the Villager reported on the 242-foot-tall dormitory NYU associate vice president of government and community affairs Alicia Hurley has started fighting back by defending the plans. She contacted us about the story in an e-mail:
Last week's "news" of our new residence hall hit the bandwith [sic] and airwaves with very little accuracy and was orchestrated by a local group whom I can only guess feels they have been left out of the process. But the group's executive director has taken on NYU in an effort to build his own political profile and career, and frankly it has come at the expense of open dialogue between NYU and the community. At this point we have decided that we need to find a mechanism for outreach and communication that might not call on that group or its executive director as a middle point. The story you are reporting comes from the agitation of that decision.
And who exactly is behind this plot against the University? Mostly Andrew Berman the director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation who dug up the zoning drawings above. And what exactly did he misrepresent? Well, from Hurley: "Andrew Berman is wrong to call the zoning drawings final building renderings, and assessing them as the actual design of the building. This is naïve at best and duplicitous at worst."
Of course, when the Villager asked NYU spokesperson John Beckman "if the actual shape of the building will differ from the zoning schematics" he refused to elaborate from his prepared e-mail statement that "the schematics tell you about the height and the size of the building, but the look and design of the building cannot be understood from these elevations. We will be producing renderings, and they’ll explain the look of the building much better.” He wouldn't even tell them if "the building might resemble a triangle rather than a rectangle"!
Unsurprisingly, Berman has some folks on his side too. State Senator Tom Duane told the Villager "I fail to see how and when community input took place. And I think it’s wrong to attack Andrew on this. G.V.S.H.P has done a lot of wonderful work in the Village — that has enhanced it for NYU.” And as for Berman, he says “this is to deflect attention away from their project, which is completely unwanted by the community, and their utter failure to respond to community concerns or keep their commitment to do so.”
Sounds to us like this is about to get dirty. For instance, did we mention the part where NYU's Beckman wrote in an August 2 statement that "Andrew Berman’s public utterances are discouragingly full of falsehoods and willful misinformation," accused him of trying to “inflame neighborhood passion through carelessness and inaccuracies," and finally saying "we publicly call on him to retract his false assertions"?
Renderings of the planned 26-story NYU dorm on E. 12th Street from last week's The Villager.





Berman is anti-everything. The foundation for this has already been poured.
hmm... probably because most of what this City builds is utter crap.
I got a case of insomnia last night and decided to listen to my scanner at 4 am when the bars let out to see if there's any action.
Well, there was a job for a dispute between 2 females at 400 broome street so I googled it, it's the address of a NYU dorm. Damn, NYU had dorms all over lower Manhattan. Some of these dorms look really ugly, they look like welfare offices.
Beckman is NYU's spinmeister. Don't believe a goddam thing he says -- he lies for a living. Duplicity, indeed.
It should be noted that the Greenwich Vilage Society for Historic Preservation is actually for the rennovation of the park. Talk about inconsistent.
You might as well rename that whole area NYU town.
Granted this is coming from a former NYU student (now happily reintegrated into "normal" society, thank you) but I do have to wonder just what the hell the university is supposed to do in this situation, as they are currently incapable of guaranteeing housing for all of their incoming freshmen, much less the entire student body. NYU is bursting at the seams and they have to put them somewhere. Where are they going to stick them, 26th Street? Oh wait...
Badly Drawn Girl- Maybe NYU should accept that it can no longer expand to take over the entire city and stop accepting more and more students. But, any limits to growth seem to be uncontemplatable to Americans, who view it as "natural". Should NYU keep expaning until all of the Village is owned by them? Tell me, does that make any sense?
NYU is a private, for-profit organization. Of course they're not going to cap their growth. They'll just end up screwing over all the out-of-town new students who now find themselves dumped in the middle of New York after orientation with no place to live.
I guess NYU could always open up a Bronx satellite campus...it worked for them in the past after all, lol.
The University Heights campus almost did them in by the 1970s when they sold it to prevent bankruptcy. However, keep in mind that NYU was strictly a commuter school until the early 1980s when they bought their first dorm from the law school.
I completely disagree with the design and scale of the building, but it is better than the alternatives: keeping open the dorms in the financial district or throwing them out into the streets *and* demanding 30,500 in tuition every year.