<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: The Greening of the City</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Greening of the City</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:11:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Adam Piontek</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-153330</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-153330</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:31:10 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not everything is easily reduced to &quot;NIMBYism.&quot;  The proposed marine transfer station is way overboard.  While all communities should be responsible for their own waste, one community shouldn&apos;t be forced to be responsible for everyone&apos;s waste - particularly a community that is already in need of revitalization and integration.  Putting such a massive garbage transfer site there would be a slap in the face to the community.

A better solution would be for the city to adopt Consumer Union’s “Reaching for Zero” proposal, along with a more distributed waste-disposal strategy that doesn&apos;t shunt everything through one neighborhood.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Anomalous</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-152975</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-152975</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:26:17 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The city generates a lot of garbage.  We need to take care of it, and the 91st St. marine waste transfer station is the best solution offered so far. It is not enough to simply oppose the station at 91st St. --that&apos;s just classicy NIMBYism-- another, better, solution must be offered.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mike</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-152915</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/26/the_greening_of.php#comment-152915</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:34:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And then there&apos;s the planned E 91st St. garbage dump.  Gothamist, can you please help draw some much-needed attention to this issue?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>