<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: New Newsstands are So So Shiny, But Limiting</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php</link>
<description>All comments for New Newsstands are So So Shiny, But Limiting</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:11:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Dave</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141996</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141996</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:05:17 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s horrible. What&apos;s happening to our once-unique, great city. Full of character and quirkiness. Homegenization to look like Minneapolis or some other souless metroburb, is what. I hope gangs of marauding youths (from acorss the water of course--no youths can afford to live here) run down in packs and tear these eyesores down. That, or the market suddenly crashes. All hail the market crash to end this madness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>subtle</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141960</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141960</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:07:29 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;re fhm and others, i think they should be banned from public display. i don&apos;t want to look at that stuff, and i certainly wouldn&apos;t want my kid to see it either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Max</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141670</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141670</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:08:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Good ole American Immigrant inginuity will have these things looking ccompletely diffferent within a month. Of course they will probably be fined, but making more money will win out.
Look OK, just chilly as hell- from an aesthetic and weather point of view. Is there even a window for the vendor so he or she doesn&apos;t freeze to death in the middle of the winter? I cannot see one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mike B.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141647</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141647</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:28:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Of all the New York things to be nostalgic for...newsstands? Come on.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ms. b.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141636</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141636</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:08:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;agreed...a bit sterile to me. hopefully the vendor will clutter them up and make them more homey.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Toby</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141618</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:31:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;More bad modern design where form does not seem to follow function.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>diabolix</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141608</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/06/21/new_newsstands.php#comment-141608</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:02:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I actually prefer the newer designs.  I prefer them for two reasons:

A- New doesn&apos;t necessarily mean bad as the article seems to imply.  Just because something is &quot;sleek and futuristic&quot; doesn&apos;t mean that it doesn&apos;t address the functions needed in the kiosk.  From what I&apos;ve seen, the designers actually addressed issues such as the ability to actualy clean the structure effectively and created a space that is able to be used by the differently-abled.

B- The old kiosks are eyesores and are often times so poorly taken care of that the original details are virtually obscured and actually are safety hazards.  If you&apos;ve ever had a pair of pants ruined because of poor care of the kiosk or seen one with the door fall open then you know what I mean.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>