Gothamist: Hillary Hates Mr. Met!

not entirely

Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:43:25 -0500

Not that surprising that HC is allegedly a Cubs "fan", since she's originally from Chicago.

lame

Thu, 25 May 2006 01:02:31 -0500

Bill and Hillary are probably tired after the Times went down on them the other day. If she runs for President we are going to have to endure more "analysis" of their marriage. "Lame" was a poke at Gothamist giving the baseball story the time of day.

Joe Blow

Wed, 24 May 2006 19:14:33 -0500

Why does Hillary have to be such a bitch?

Toby

Wed, 24 May 2006 18:46:28 -0500

Mr. Met is a much better mascot than the Yankees mascot, George Steinbrenner.

jhnmrk

Wed, 24 May 2006 17:28:24 -0500

i'm a mets fan, but i find it interesting that she goes for the cubs when the entire time she lived in arkansas, the local minor league team, the travelers, were a cards farm team.

Tim N.

Wed, 24 May 2006 16:18:43 -0500

Lewinski would be down for anything. Sorry, it was out there over the plate like a Jose Lima curveball. Polled 1,000 Met fans, and 800 said that Mr. Met *is* our senator.

LiAps

Wed, 24 May 2006 13:52:29 -0500

The Yankees can have her. I'm sure Lewinsky would be down for a Shea Stadium clubhouse tour. I heard Alay Soler brought some real Cubans down from Binghamton.

Please

Wed, 24 May 2006 13:32:48 -0500

MH, get up off your knees and whipe those lips. Hillary has left the room, but I'm sure you will wait patiently for Bill to come home from the golf course...

MH

Wed, 24 May 2006 13:09:48 -0500

It is interesting to me. Thank you Hillary for keepin it real. The media should speak up about this. Who cares about most phony, old school politicians who are chosing two teams to get votes and to cheese up to the public. We have heard enough about them. Why not this? NO... Sorry. I prefer stories on a smart woman like Hillary. I don't like the Mets either. I prefer the Yankees and Atlanta Braves. Are you really lame or is that some kind of nick name?

lame

Wed, 24 May 2006 12:13:18 -0500

This is about as interesting as yesterday's New York Times fluff piece on the Clinton's marriage.