<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Unique Pastry</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php</link>
<description>All comments for Unique Pastry</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>ida</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127779</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127779</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 13:23:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear cdjames,

How exactly does this offend you? Are you one of Gothamist&apos;s writers or a friend of a writer? Gothamist is clearly part of a business, not a personal blog. This site would be a great resource for New Yorkers if it were better written, and I think it&apos;s fine for people to point that out in hopes of seeing some well-edited posts in the future. We&apos;d all benefit if Gothamist hired a qualified a copy editor. Would you really have a problem with that, or do you think the writing here is fine?

ida&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>cdjames</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127726</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127726</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 11:02:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Critics, write your own blog, then consider yourself lucky if people care enough to bash your writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rob</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127510</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127510</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:13:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;gothamist must not be a native english speaker. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ida</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127460</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127460</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 17:29:04 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed with the two first comments. This is not the first or even hundredth near-incoherent post on this site. What&apos;s up?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mary</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127420</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127420</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:16:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bing is chinese for bread/bun/cake/sandwich.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rob</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127380</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127380</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i agree with steve-o. it took me three readings to get the details of this &apos;bing&apos; straight. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>steve-0</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127368</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/05/15/unique_pastry.php#comment-127368</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:12:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m generally not too much of a writing- Nazi, but the prose here is dreadful. Note to the editor(s)- if you need to read it twice to understand it, try again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>