Gothamist: EWWW! Man Tries to Tongue Bathe Straphanger Feet

Brightliner

Mon, 08 May 2006 12:20:40 -0500

And again, your cretinism rears its ugly head (probably to match your ugly feet). Please point out anywhere in any of my posts where I "bitched" about the size of women's feet? All I did was state a preference. I guess men never do that, eh? Guys never say they like redheads, blondes, nice butts, nice boobs, legs, fair-skinned, dark-skinned, supermodel thin, Rubinesque, etc. Go ahead, get your feet "worshipped," if that's what floats your boat, or your supertankers, as they were, since they're obviously what you consider your best feature. Personally, I've never worshipped feet. I worship what's between the ears, and I don't mean the hangar-sized empty space you have.

footsy

Mon, 08 May 2006 11:12:23 -0500

Oh Brightliner, don't get your manties in a bunch. Nothing I could possibly say would compare to the ridiculousness of your bitching about the size of women's feet.

Brightliner

Sun, 07 May 2006 18:11:06 -0500

"footsy," You're a complete and unmitigated imbecile, did you know that? Sorry, but I don't bite when baited with baseless questions about my masculinity. As for your other statement, you're apparently too stupid to understand that what K was claiming was that feet haven't grown bigger. He was saying measurement methods changed while actual dimensions remained constant, which is the exact opposite of you (and the historian and myself, if you could could actually comprehend my original post) saying feet are growing. Do try to understand somebody's post before you claim to argue on his side then contradict him in the same breath. As it is, your idiocy will be on display here for all posterity (or at least as long as Gothamist lasts).

footsy

Sun, 07 May 2006 15:03:02 -0500

Aww Brightliner, not getting laid again? Any guy who claims that some women's body part should be whatever size is obviously wining and dining his hand this evening. Actually the historian backed up K's post. Men's sizes have also been increasing. As nutrition over the years improved, everything grew. DUH. You have to be an idiot not to know this. My perfect 9s have been worshipped many times, and they keep me balanced!

Brightliner

Sat, 06 May 2006 21:54:37 -0500

Where do you get this absurd notion of shoe sizes changing with time? Are you saying the Brannock Device has been repeatedly recalibrated over the last eight decades as it must have been if sizes keep changing as you claim? Why don't you let people who actually know something about the topic slip a word in? Say for instance the podiatric historian cited in this article.

k

Sat, 06 May 2006 20:31:39 -0500

Brightliner, you seem to be stuck in a handy nostalgic fantasy (that, for some reason, wants to criticize contemporary women for being BORN with feet that are too "big", WTF?) Don't forget that the measurement of shoe sizes, like clothing sizes, have changed over the years (especially the last 100 years, jesus), and historic sizes are NOT comparable to modern sizes. Why even derail this post with such comments?

Brightliner

Sat, 06 May 2006 15:39:22 -0500

Sorry, but most women don't have nice feet anyway. They're usually hammertoed, calloused, hideous things with dry, chapped heels, deformed by too many hours in high heels. And oversize, too. Not that I'd be into footbinding, but I'd like to see a nice pair of natural size sixes. Did you know that average American woman wore a size 4 a hundred years ago? Today the average is over 8. Sasquatch will soon have company at this rate.

footfan

Sat, 06 May 2006 14:24:43 -0500

hey let's remember many people appreciate women's feet without accosting them. Don't give all of us a bad name. When a woman is raped we don't condemn sex.

bklynd

Sat, 06 May 2006 12:59:51 -0500

Indeed, it needs to be said that conventional flashers are all too common.

footsy

Sat, 06 May 2006 12:48:29 -0500

If anything, he's a thief. People pay good money to worship women's feet! The NYPD never ceases to amuse me, since I don't recall hearing such a passionate response to any of the guys waving their willies at female riders.