Is the USOC Giving New York City the 2016 Snub?

2006_05_nyc2016.jpgThis is a dis on a grand scale (to NYC tourism, at least). Or it's a blessing in disguise. The U.S. Olympic Committee is not visiting New York City when it visits potential cities for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Cities the USOC is visiting: Houston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco. One could say that the USOC already visited NYC before it selected it to be the 2012 US Olympic city bid, but, hey, it's a whole new ballgame, with no hope of a West Side Stadium, a probably most-completed Ground Zero, and a huge tract of land in Greenpoint ripe for development.

The NY Times says that Mayor Bloomberg is ambivalent about pursuing the Olympics again because of the "loss of the West Side stadium; the fact that the failed 2012 bid had already jump-started several of his administration's development plans; and the fact that the International Olympic Committee's choice of the 2016 city would not come until 2009, after he would be out of office." We wonder if City Comptroller William Thompson or Congressman Anthony Weiner will start a 2016 exploratory committee. But, really, does the city really want an Olympics? If Bloomberg's razzle-dazzle (and billions) can't convince a city or the IOC, who can?

Gothamist on the announcement the 2012 Olympics wouldn't be here.

Email This Entry


Comments (5) [rss]

The Olympics are for second-rate cities anyway...

user-pic

Here are my thoughts on the cities being visited:
Houston - Too bloody hot.
Philadelphia - Corrupt and crime ridden, USOC would most likely get hit up for "donations".
Chicago - They may actually do a decent job.
Los Angeles - Been there, done that. Too soon for a redo.
San Francisco - Most likely more of an enitre Bay Area bid. May have the strongest chance of all of them.

Anyway, the Olympics are stupid, boring, and basically a professional sports specatacle hosted by cities with inferority complexes. As long as they are not in NYC that is a good thing.

New York should have the Olympics sometime if it's done right.

The Olympics are for second-rate cities anyway...

[1] Posted by: akatsuki [TypeKey Profile Page] | May 4, 2006 11:37 AM

*******************
Rome, Tokyo, Los Angeles, Athens, London . . .

These people would not be ragging on the Olympics if NY was selected!

And as the poster above mentioned, they have already done many major cities..

I Highly doubt Tokyo and London are considered "second-rate".

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

It's the same media that NEVER mentioned Muslims' hatred of Israel as a possible motive for 9/11.
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us