<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: NY POST: Peter Braunstein Likes Charles Bronson Movies!</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/04/23/ny_post_peter_b.php</link>
<description>All comments for NY POST: Peter Braunstein Likes Charles Bronson Movies!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:08:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Toby</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/04/23/ny_post_peter_b.php#comment-120754</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/04/23/ny_post_peter_b.php#comment-120754</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:03:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the contents of the Post does not contain a &quot;shred of new verifiable information&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Lois Lane</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2006/04/23/ny_post_peter_b.php#comment-120752</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2006/04/23/ny_post_peter_b.php#comment-120752</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:47:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I couldn&apos;t stop reading that article either,but seeing how the Post was able to reopen this story with new juicy info just makes me sad that the paper has virtually ignored the Jared Paul Stern story.

I am sure their lawyers are advising this, but I still think it is a mistake both for their credibility and for the readers who have come to expect Page Six to cover this kind of scandal.

Maybe it is too late now.  Maybe the Jared Story is now long in the tooth, but I still wish the Post would cover it.

Do you think they ever will?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>