Whoa! Someone has created a website to support Darryl Littlejohn, the chief suspect in the Imette St. Guillen rape and murder case. It's up at DarrylLittlejohn.com, and includes a list of reasons why Littlejohn might be innocent, a poll, and clock recording the number of days of his "false imprisonment."

Related: the Post has a good run-down of the papers released by prosecutors yesterday. They contained transcripts of a number of conversations between Littlejohn and the detectives in the week following the murder.





You're up, Deng. Jack, you're on deck...
burn this black bitch
Another picture of Littlejohn. Good idea. Maybe he has one where he is raping Imette repeatedly and where he suffocates her by wrapping tape around her head?
He should be set free in a locked room with Imette's family and friends for a few hours to find out what pain and torture really feel like, that no good P.O.S. scumbag.
REASONS WHY LITTLEJOHN IS GUILTY OF FIRST DEGREE MURDER:
1. He was the last person to see her alive
2. His blood was found on (and DNA proved this) the plastic ties used to bind St. Guillen.
3. His rabbit and mink coat fibers were (and DNA proved this) found on the packing tape used on her. Each hair has a distinct DNA code, not like carpet fibers.
4. He told NYPD his alibi was: he was at home (which he wasn't he was working) and then with his girlfriend visiting his mother. His own mother refutes his alibi. He never visited his mother.
5. His cell phone "pings" were in the direct vicinity of the dumping spot where St. Guillen was found.
6. An eyewitness allegedly saw his van make a U-Turn away from the crime scene.
7. Red carpet fibers from his basement torture chamber were found on the packing tape used to bind the victim. (This eveidence however may be inconclusive because of the common use of the carpeting... however, see #3.
8. He lied to investigators about his whereabouts, his US Marshal status and seeing her at the bar the night she was murdered.
9. An eyewitness said he saw St. Guillen get into Littlejohn's van around 4am. He even descibed jewlery she was wearing. These detailed descriptions were not realeased to the public in news reports pr press confrences.
10. He has behavioral problems and severe rage issues. Remember, according to news reports and his criminal background one of the crimes he commited in the past was a violent assault.
He maintains his innocence by saying he's a scapegoat because of his criminal background and his skin color (race card issues).
Littlejohn is guilty, not by a trial in the newspapers, but because of physical and DNA evidence. I hope he burns in hell.
There are some sick people who actually like serial killers. I think that there was a Law & Order episode about that sort of thing.
I have been following this case very closely. I think that this man (Littlejohn) knows something but is not talking. And where is his friend Kwan. What is Kwan's real name. Why is it that The Falls has not disclosed information for the public about this Kwan guy. Remember the story of the young girl in Brooklyn (Moore)murder by members of a gang. In the same case, a man that could have saved her life when he saw her alive with the young man, said nothing to help her. He had seen her alive. For fear of being killed by the same guys that killed the girl, he said nothing.
1. I went to The Falls and went inside. It is a very nice looking spacious place. (sports bar type) It is very un-assuming. It would be a perfect enviornment to trap someone with an innocent mind.
2. At the Falls I looked for the famous side door which she was alledgley escorted out of. Looking from outside of the bar, there is no obvious exit. If he escorted her out, it should have been the front door. Also the homeless man that described her jewlry. If he was in the park he could not have seen jewlry. He was too far away. He had to be up close. It was too dark.
3. After being in the neighborhood, it opened my mind. Could someone in the neighborhood have done this in their home. There could have been a regular that gets off on kinky stuff and paid The Falls to set something up.
4. If he (Littlejohn) killed her, why didn't he rape her? She was rapped in a very vicious way. It doesn't make sense. Why would you do one and not the other.
5. He (Littlejohn) said that he did escort her out and took the train home. Why has no one refuted and discredited that statement?
6. Why are some detectives saying that her hands were tided with string and her feet with wire. But the newspapers are saying that blood was found on plastic ties.
7. For the sake of argument? Has anyone check his mothers psychosis. Could she have been visitig his house and killed this girl. He said that he was visisting the mother. Was she visiting him? I heard that the DNA under Imette's nails belongs to a women.
8. Why did they go door to door in the black neighbor hood with pictures asking to speak to all young males of a specific age. Why did they not do the same in the neighborhood around The Falls.
9. There are some sexual offenders registered down the street at The Mission, not far away.
HM,
You are an idiot. Of course this sick fuck littlejohn did it. The only doubt in your mind is your own psychosis.
"How come if he raped her didn't his DNA show up inside her?" Because maybe he used a condom or objects as cops suggest! I mean, I know its hard to use your imagination but try.
There is a long list of evidence that is irrefutable. The sicko is guilty. Get over it and come back to reality.
-realist
Tim N., in case you missed it I never defended this scumbag in any of my posts ever. I was outraged at the pre-emptive lynching/call-for-death to this guy before any solid evidence came in. And I was doing it because--as those threads demonstate--when a black person is the "suspect" in anything, it's usually an excuse for the closeted and not so closeted racists to come out an play.
I'm completely against pre-emptive judgement. Now that he's been proven to be the only person who could have done this, lock him up and throw away the key.
Don't know what genius setup a website to save this guy was thinking, but there are better things he could have done with the time/energy.
Such noble statesmen. In the movie that plays in your heads, I bet you all have Dennis Franz playing the lead role of yourself.
Go get 'em tiger!
I find this disgusting, BUT... am I the only one who giggled a little whenever reporters used just his last name? All I could think of was "Lil Jon." WHAT? YEAH! OH-KAY!
Totally inappropriate, but funny nonetheless.
I had to look up who Dennis Franz was. So Littlejohn is not guilty because we can make an educated opinion of his guilt? It must be nice to feel so superior malatron.
HM,
your comments not only are ridiculous, but idiotic.
First of all, the police have no obligation at all to release anything to the public. Sometimes the newspapers will play along with the police and will deliberately lie in their reports to confuse potential suspects or people of interest.
There's no law (nor is it unconsistutional) stating that the police and press can't lie in a newspaper report. Also, the police can lie to a suspect or suspects while questioning them in order to get a confession (it's not forced), in fact it's standard practice with all law enforcement not only in this nation, but other democratic nations. The key to this game is, if you're really innocent, you will have no reason to lie, Littlejohn lied repeadedly to the police and again to press when he was interviewed from jail.
and you have not been following this case closely at all. They have interviewd patrons of the bar, neighbors and people who have stepped up as witnesses who were in or near the bar at the time of the disappearance (4am). (Stop playing this BULLSHIT race card and get a life)
think logically, Littlejohn has been in prison more than half his life. He should know by now how to "cover is tracks". I think he did rape her. However, I'm sure he either used a condom, or did not ejaculate inside her (that would be evidence). or perhaps he used an object other than his penis. If he did use a condom trace evidence of spermicide, talc and other chemicals would have probably shown up. He cleaned her up, that is why the police tore into his piping in his house.
Now that he's been indicted, the public will hear very little about the case until trial. Why? there's no reason to tell anyone anything, unless they're looking for another suspect, but even then, it's unlikely to hear much about the case.
Lastly, some DNA evidence takes longer to teast than others. If they get a "no match" they can test it more precicely at another lab with better more prcise equipment, it takes weeks for test results to come back, so don't think it's going to happen overnight like on TV... This is real life and the police will take their time with this one, time is in fact, on their side.
PS, while you were at "The Falls" other than be a shadey character who's not a detective, did you speak to the bartenders or owners and get their thoughts or perhaps a confession?
I see that that the creator of the website is turning this into a "Brotha" issue.
*yawn*
Some people will try to get attention any way they can.
edEx---I agree, we won't hear much more about Littlejohn until trial time, and then the shitload of evidence against him will be overwhelming. He's probably going to be indicted as a serial rapist in those other rape cases too. I'd bet my money on it.
Did you notice?....the Poll at DarrlyLittlejohn.com is rigged ! Even if you vote NAY, it STILL adds it to the YEA.
regarding:
"Will Darryl Littlejohn be tried and convicted whether he is guilty or innocent?"
I just did a NAY, and it added 1 to the YEA.
(I then went "Back" a page, clicked on NAY again, and bingo....it added another one to the YEA.(
What a joke. A lair taking up for another liar.
The idiot on Darrylittlejohn's website got a blog now. Please give me a break!!