Thrax is Back, But This Time, It's Natural

2006_02_vado.jpgYesterday afternoon there was the fear of anthrax in the air. But it turned out not to be the weaponized kind mailed to newscasters or politicians - it was actually seemed to naturally occuring anthrax in animal hides that a Manhattan dancer/drum-maker. There are conflicting reports about the case, such as as to whether or not Vado Diomande brought the hides back to NYC from Africa (it's illegal) or if he bought them from a distributor, or whether or not he contracted anthrax from the hides here, but what officials do not believe anyone is at risk. Even though swarms of cops, health officials and even the FBI checked out Diomande's apartment in the West Village and workspace in Dumbo, Mayor Bloomberg was quick to point out, "If you didn't work with the hides, you're not going to contract anthrax. So if you live next door or if you shook hands with the guy, you're don't have a risk. You'd have to really work with the untreated hides." (But a few people who came in contact with the hides are taking antibiotics.) So, the only anthrax we should be afraid of is the white stuff, but try not to handle untreated animal hides if you can.

Diomande collapsed earlier this month after a dance performance in Pennsylvania; he is still recovering there and colleagues were shocked to hear he had contracted anthrax. The Times profiles a NJ postal worker who contracted anthrax back in 2001 and looks at the search to understand how Diomande contracted anthrax, and the Daily News thinks that the city did well by notifying everyone about the issue to get us informed. And Gothamist remembers an anthrax scare downtown back in 2003.

Email This Entry


Comments (2) [rss]

user-pic

What's interesting about this story as I watched it on the news last night is that reporter said, "We aren't releasing his name, to protect his identity..." meanwhile a huge picture of the guy is up on the screen. There aren't a lot of black 40-something, african drummers in Greenwich Village, so they pretty much did the damage.

I'm just curious if "anything" nowadays warrants having your privacy. They still protect the ID of women who have been raped, but not the person "accused" of the rape (even if that person turns out to be innocent--they reputation is over forever as their face has been plastered everywhere in the media). Other than rape, aren't there other things that we can expect to retain our privacy for?

I feel uneasy about his picture everywhere as well. I saw it on the front page of the paper and I felt so bad for the guy. Its not his fault and if no one else can have been contaminated, why is his picture everywhere??

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Prohibition Error Bowling Alley Found in Queens Basement http://www.scoutingny.com/
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us