Quantcast

7 Angry Transit Workers

2006_01_21_transitstrikeseq.jpgSpeaking of, Transit Workers Union Local 100 voted yesterday to reject their new contract 11,227 for, 11,234 against. Needless to say, that seven vote margin has made the city's news organizations very, very excited. And us? Well, a little on edge (the excitement we got out of our system making that snazzy new logo to your right).

That itty-bitty margin of seven votes, the News calls it "thinner than a MetroCard," puts Union Boss Roger Toussaint in a very uncomfortable position. Not only is his union split down the middle over pensions, raises and healthcare premiums but now the MTA holds a few more cards thanks to diminished public opinion of the union (which is why, we'd wager, they are now petitioning for binding arbitration despite Toussaint's previous rejections). And it gets even more uncomfortable within the union as the Times makes a pretty reasonable argument that the split seems "to boil down to one simple number: age." Expanded healthcare got the older members to vote yes while the new 1.5 percent and upwardly mobile healthcare premiums got the younger members to vote no.

Beyond that though, despite all of the coverage we're all giving this new development, all we've actually gotten from most of it comes down to the fact that nobody really knows what is going to happen. Until the dust settles a bit there are just too many variables in this case. However, our gut tells us that common sense will prevail and another strike won't happen (though, our gut might also believe in wildcat actions). What does your gut tell you?

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Peter



    That's exactly why the union will settle via arbitration. At the end of the day, it's the lesser evil to having the union destroyed.

  • Hopefully the binding arbitration will go well, but given their track record (no pun intended) of not playing by the rules I wouldn't be shocked if there was a strike. However, I think the TWU would have better sense than to do that, as it would most likely lead to several million people wanting the MTA to crush the TWU.

  • Jeremy Y

    Although it lost by seven votes, I think the title of the post should be 4 Angry Transit Workers, as it would have only taken 4 votes to turn it the other way.

  • Peter

    Looks like binding arbitration. The union had a great deal of public opposition prior to the first strike. Politically, they can't pull off another one.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com