<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Santacon Forever!</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php</link>
<description>All comments for Santacon Forever!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>John</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-87045</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-87045</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:37:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Santa Stripping at...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbsibley/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Lawyer</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86902</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86902</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:37:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The logo is a trademark, not a copyright, and its use even in a pardody is a litigation-magnet.  You&apos;re blurring the MTA&apos;s mark, which is a cause of action.  As far as the rest of the sign, even if there are copyrights you&apos;d be ok with the parody exception.  Of course, once you post any of the signs in a public place, even if they&apos;re intended to be humorous, you&apos;re inviting all sorts of criminal charges.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jake</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86852</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86852</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:13:57 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;good question-- does anyone know?  it&apos;s possible that the design is copyrighted-- and certainly their logo is, but we do have a fair-use law for situations involving parody, which seems to be what these signs fall under.  lawyers: any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chung-chieh Shan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86851</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86851</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:45:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What are the legal implications of someone who&apos;s not the MTA providing an online MTA sign generator?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>C</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86844</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86844</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:55:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i thought hipsters were really innovative artists who could make their own shit. i guess not. do your own work and you&apos;ll end up with a sign.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Toby</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86840</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/11/santacon_foreve.php#comment-86840</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:12:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;First off got to love the Coolvetica on the faux sign.

I have come up with a subway line font and have the NYCTA logos in a font complete with the &quot;Going your way.&quot; If you guys want to provide the space I&apos;d share them.
If you have the full on version of Acrobat you can easily edit the signs, although someone needs to get their hands on the NYCTABullet font and share it with the masses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>