<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Appeals Court Stops Push for Gay Marriage in NYC</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php</link>
<description>All comments for Appeals Court Stops Push for Gay Marriage in NYC</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>huh??</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86682</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86682</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:08:48 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Then why did Bloomberg veto or nix gay-oriented legislation three times in his last term?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ryan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86648</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86648</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:03:09 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bloomberg&apos;s not making any sense (unless you read his actions with a cynical eye) but if he&apos;s had a change of heart, and is going to use his landslide election win to fight the good fight I won&apos;t complain.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86612</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:52:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;NY1 is reporting now that Bloomberg is going to fight the decision. Isn&apos;t he the one who sent it to the courts in the first place?

http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&amp;aid=55523&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>D</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86604</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/09/appeals_court_s.php#comment-86604</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:00:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The focus on children seems strange.  Does the court mean to imply that elderly people, past their childbearing years, should not get married?  What about heterosexual couples who have no intention of having kids?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>