<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Very Old Wall Found in Battery Park</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php</link>
<description>All comments for Very Old Wall Found in Battery Park</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 nyc_daveh</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>daveh@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>daveh@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86509</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86509</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:17:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So it&apos;s about 40 yards west of State St., in the north part of the park, and runs roughly parallel to State St.?  It couldn&apos;t be the fort foundation, because State St. was itself on the west side of the fort.

If the thing is ten feet down, maybe it&apos;s a bulkhead for State St, which used to front on the water.  Or maybe it&apos;s a bulkhead for the slip that was SW of the Bowling Green, below the windmill. 

I also found a factoid in Booth&apos;s History of New York (1859) that indicates that St. Nicholas Church, built in 1642, would have been 72&apos; x 52&apos; with walls 16&apos; in height - all cut stone.   That would be roughly on the same scale as the wall that&apos;s there.  Maps put the church inside the fort in the northwest corner, though, so that theory has the same problem as the fort foundation hypothesis.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>steve</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86472</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86472</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:57:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It was not expected. We knew about the possibility of finding artifacts, but a large wall like this is really a wrench in the plans.

as for the &quot;grand battery&quot;, there never was a subway tunnel in this location. the current #1 tunnel is 40 yards away. the best guess of the LPC archeologists is that this is either the &quot;half moon battery wall&quot; or part of the ft. george foundation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>me</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86453</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86453</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:53:50 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;what&apos;s that sound? oh wait – i think it&apos;s jake on his way to put some &quot;street art&quot; on it!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sterling</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86429</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/12/08/the_wall.php#comment-86429</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:49:15 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hate to be a killjoy but I&apos;d be really surprised if they didn&apos;t know it was there beforehand.  It&apos;s probably the old &quot;Grand Battery&quot;, which I *think* I&apos;ve read had to be cut through when the subway line was originally put through there, about 100 years ago.

What they ought to be looking for while they&apos;re down there is any marble from the original city hall.  There&apos;s one old bit that&apos;s supposed to say something like &quot;Nieuw Amsterdam Staat House&quot; that&apos;s been missing for about 250 years.  It&apos;s not unreasonable to think that the British might have used it to reinforce the battery during the Revolution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>