On Sundays, Gothamist runs opinion pieces, mostly to amuse ourselves. Don't blame us for anything written below.
Sounding like so much spam, my girlfriend received a message in her email last week entitled "RX!" The body of the note stated that "it wasn't a matter of if the avian flu is going to reach you, but when" and implored her to "visit [her] doctor this week!" and "get a prescription" because other countries are "already out of Tamiflu."
The kicker? This email was from her mother.
At first glance, it seems like a wonderful time to slide up to your favorite physician and get a little Tamiflu-love on the side, even if you do not feel the slightest bit sniffly or achy. After all, flu season is upon us, and Tamiflu is one drug that seems to be making consistent inroads in the war on influenza, as well as being effective in putting a dent in the bird flu once it does decide to make the leap from human-to-human. The Boy Scouts tell us to always be prepared, and given the shortages of the drug, it seems from a self-preservationist standpoint to be the way to approach the impending doom.
This is completely wrong.
First, all the lefties with their sense of civic duty and all the righties with a sense of moral obligation should hold off and let someone more deserving take their hit of Tamiflu. When the pandemic comes to town, it will be those people with the weaker immune systems and those people in high risk jobs that will need to be protected first. People have gotten and subsequently developed antibodies against H1N5, the strain of avian flu that we're all scared of, so if you're young and healthy, your body is probably strong enough to keep you alive and kicking long enough to build up those antibodies yourself. Grandma probably doesn't have those luxuries, and the folks in the ER are exposed to more nasties than you ever will be. The vaccines that exist should be available to those who need it the most.
If doing good by others isn't your thing, then you should take heed the notion that any strain of the avian flu that decides to make the jump to a pandemic-causing human strain of the virus is going to have to mutate some more, and that Tamiflu may not even be the right treatment any more. According to the CDC, there is no avian flu vaccine, so Tamiflu may not be the right answer here anyway. Using the drug in the wrong way could cause the virus to become resilient to it, rendering any stockpiles ineffective in the end. That everyone is clamoring for Tamiflu says more for the ineffectiveness of all of the old drugs on the market which have, over time, lost their potency to every-stronger, ever-changing strains of the virus.
But even if you're still craving your own private stash of the drug (to go with your collection of Cipro), remember that we've had avian flu making the jump from birds to humans since 1997. The CDC still considers the chance of the avian flu making the jump from birds to humans in the U.S. to be low, and the jump from human-to-human to be lower. The case of avian flu that was found in Texas in 2004 was different from the avian flu tearing through Asia, so in all likelihood, it's going to take a while longer before we're actually facing down a real live pandemic.
But in the end, you're SOL anyway, because Roche stopped shipping Tamiflu to the U.S. on Thursday.
So don't worry. You're probably going to be fine, but if the pandemic does come to town, your best bet is to take a page from the Boccaccio playbook and head for the hills. If it's good enough for the plague, it's good enough for the flu.
Jesse Chan-Norris is more critical than you are, but in a friendly sort of way. He can be found all over the web, but especially at jessechannorris.com.




The bird-flu/Tamiflu panic, by some remarkable coincidence, also serves to line the pockets of Donald Rumsfeld...
Check it out.
I'm a physician practicing in Dallas. There are several problems with your analysis:
1. NOBODY has natural antibodies to Avian Flu. That is one of the reasons that makes it so dangerous.
2. This particularly strain of flu virus DOES NOT only cause serious morbidity/mortality amongst the age extremes or people weakened from some chronic illness; rather, it is an equal opportunity killer. In rough numbers - in the world, roughly sixty people have come down with this flu, and of these about thirty (50%) have died. In this group of thirty there are plenty of previously healthy young adults.
No, notwithstanding the poorly referenced and completely irresponsible assertions made in this post, the reason that people are so concerned about this flu is that if it does mutate to a form that is spread peron-to-person, then it definitely will kill off millions of people around the world. Moreover, it will kill off millions of healthy young people in our own country.
So, yes, there is absolutely a reason to be concerned about this potentiality. That is the reason that governments around the world are taking it so seriously.
So, while your post was witty and read very well, it was the type of post that "sounds good when you say it quickly"; however, unfortunately, it does not square with reality in the least.
There are other problems with this analysis, but I will leave it at answering just these two.
In conclusion, while I do agree that there may be some argument about "hoarding" Tamiflu, there is NO argument about the potential devasting nature of this disease. I will end by stressing a salient point - this flu will just as easily kill previously healthy people (There is a pathophysiologic reason behind this relating to the nature of the damage. While most flu illnesses produce a bronchitis, this flu seems to produce a pneumonitis, which is much more deadly.)