Rachel Maddow Pwns "Formerly" Gay Author Who "Cures" Gays
Teacher Hot For Teacher In Brooklyn High School
Bouncers Accused of Beating Gay Man for Dancing with Man
Police Fatally Shoot Gun-Wielding Man In Times Square
MTV Staffers Receiving Threats Over Jersey Shore
A day after the MTA's announcement of unprecedented and, frankly, surprising discounted fares between Thanksgiving and New Year's, the reality has set in. First off, the MTA is really trying to restore its credibility with riders by being nice; a Regional Plan Association spokesperson tells Newsday, "You can't take the politices out of it totally." Second, some critics wonder why the MTA can't put the money ($50 million for holidays discounts this year; another $50 million for possible discounts next year) towards balancing their budget inthe coming years? Policy groups tell the NY Times "Why is the M.T.A. engaging in feel-good, short-term gimmicks rather than convincing riders and business leaders that it has sensible, long-term plans for a balanced operating budget and a fully funded capital budget?" (Fiscal Policy Institute) and "There's no question that the most responsible use of the money would be to pay down the authority's unfunded pension liability" (Manhattan Institute). And, third, just because things are good this year, the MTA isn't ruling out 2007 fare hikes. Well, it's not like anyone who even peripherally follows the MTA really expected that - it's so dysfunctional. We can't always hope the real estate taxes will give us surpluses every year. We don't want to look a gift horse in the mouth (too much), but Gothamist would really prefer the MTA to give us subway service for Christmas. We'll pay the extra $1 not to be sent on wild weekend subway service goose chases!
The NY Times asks people how they will spend the extra money they are saving. Gothamist is a monthly card user, so we figure the discounting will save us $10-20; that's a holiday taxi ride right there!
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
I'd much rather have the $50 million spent on cleaning up the subway stations and improving safety measures. There is water and slime dripping all over the platforms at Canal St. and on the stairs, without a single sign warning riders. It is a big hazard to people on the platform and particularly the many elderly residents of this neighborhood who use the subway.
I have to agree with smitty, I'm pretty sure that most people are used to the amount of money they spend to ride the MTA's service by now. So why not take any surplus and put it towards bettering the subway. Maybe hire a guy with a broom. Or buy another one of those vaccuum trains to go along the tracks at night. Do something useful with it instead of giving a discount for a handfl of days during th holiday season, cause in all honesty that benefits visitors more than actual New Yorkers.
i love that image!
and i think a vacuum train would cost more than $50 mm, but yes, money on useful things would be nice.
I'd rather see them put more D, N, and R trains in service in Brooklyn so i don't have to wait for half an hour at 36th street every night.
My wish would actually be exactly the same as zach's - late night service in the outer boroughs is terrible.
Though if applying that $50 mil to debt would help them get their shit together, then they should just do that. I'm glad the critics got such strong coverage in the Times.