There's nothing the Post likes more than public sex stories. On Saturday, they plastered a photograph of a demure-looking Connecticut woman, Caitilin Clonan, on the cover along with the headline "Caitlin's Sex and the City and proceeded to explain how she and her boyfriend were caught kinda naked on First Street near Sixth Avenue by a police officer last Thursday. Clonan says it was a mistake, and she and boyfriend Philip Conlan were charged with public lewdness (she was naked from the waist down, Conlan had his clothes on, though the "status of his zipper was unclear") and will have to do some community service. Clonan tells the Post, "We were walking down a dark street in Brooklyn. I didn't think it was a big deal." Excellent: This proves that no matter many Gaps come into Park Slope, there is hope for grit by way of drunken young lovers!
What Gothamist would like to know is how they managed to have a sidewalk quickie given the rainy weather last week; at least the dog poo and piss would be mostly washed away. And in late August, a drunken couple trying to do it on a mattress left on a Park Slope sidewalk was photographed by a passer by.





This is exactly why New York needs Love Hotels that charge by the hour.
Brilliant business idea:
* Reserve hotel rooms
* Rent out hour timeslots on the Internet for $100 a piece from 2pm through 4am. $50 non-refundable deposit.
* Have a cleaning lady appear between sessions to tidy up the place.
* Profit!!!
You'd seriously clear $3000 a week doing this.
But trying to get away with fucking in public is the point for some people, not a lack of venue. I think it's kind of hot. Is that wrong? (Yes.)
why don't we do it in the road?
good god, I live on that block.
Jen W's right that doing it in public and risking getting caught provide thrills. Not for me personally, but for some of your sisters I have dated.
If you prefer not to be caught with your pants down - literally and otherwise - my advice is to wear a short skirt and no underwear.
wait, why are their last names almost exactly the same?
Partly because Gothamist misspelled "Conlon".
Actually, a slightly longer skirt with an A-line gives you a little more coverage and wiggle room. But duh with the no underwear. If you can't manage that, you deserve to get caught.
The Post article says that the police found coke in the guy's pocket, which I think accounts for about 62% of the pantsless stupidity.