Quantcast

Height Caps On!

2005_10_08_les_rezoned.jpg

The Villager [via Curbed] is reporting that the East Village rezoning push that we wrote about last month received unanimous approval at a fall Community Board 3 meeting on Sept. 27. The rezoning, based on a survey outlinned by B.F.J. Planning that was commissioned by the East Village Community Coalition, specifically deals with Alphabet City and a good chunk of the Lower East Side (the orange on the map is the rezoned area).

So what does this approval mean? Basically that, starting in the next two years, all new construction in the rezoned areas will have a lessened ability to build up thanks to a downzoned F.A.R. (floor-to-area ratio) and a new height cap. The effect of this should be, planners hope, more "contextual" buildings going up on the East Side.

Along with the unanimous O.K., however, two interesting ideas have been dropped from the original EVCC plan because of strong community opposition (though Gothamist can assure you, our fine reader, that both will undoubtedly be back soon enough). The first to go was a zoning overlay proposal along E. Houston that would allow the street to have tall buildings with enforced mixed affordable housing. The second was a proposal to add a commercial zoning overlay along St. Mark's. This second one, which seems more plausible to us, was dropped because it would allow for up to 50 new businesses in ground-floor and basement spaces on a strip that already is essentially a commercial zone (thanks to grandfathering and illegal renting).

As they are implemented, these changes, for good or for bad, are going to have a long-lasting and powerful effect on a the development of the East Village/Lower East Side. Having grown up in the area, Gothamist understands the why of the rezoning but isn't so sure about the long term goodness of it. But what about you, do you think height caps and reduced F.A.R.s are the way to go?

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Corlian

    Why does the LES need taller buildings? Though without being intimately familiar with the detailed fabric of the LES, it seems more appropriate for height restrictions in the east village and not the LES.



    I'm all for higher density residential in many cases, but usually to fix other problems. The east village has grown on its own, for better or worse, but one thing you can say is that its vibrancy is not artificial (despite the artificialness of some of the people). I think generally you shouldn't take measures to upset a healthy natural balance, and paradoxically, I think this law -- an action that could be perceived as interfering -- keeps people who have nothing to do with the community from stomping all over it and exploiting it. A 36-story tower (as an exaggerated example) on St. Marks and Avenue A only cashes in on high rents, and dumps way more people into the area somewhat artificially, most of them with no commitment to the established community. Then come the Starbuckses and Walmarts...not that I even dislike them, but that's not the east village, I don't think it should be the east village, and I think it takes willful interference with the natural community to change it into that.



    I'd rather see a mix of building ages and types in the east village than heights. As for the LES, it seems to me the crucial issue is patterns of gentrification, and if we want it, and again building ages, since some of those old apartment buildings below Delancey are probably getting into disrepair. I'm always tentative to recommend new construction because I hate the way new buildings are conceived...if they could only replace the buildings with similar ones, perhaps with more creative/innovative street level commercial/community spaces (rather than none at all...). And replace them with non-luxury apartments, which would sadly never happen.

  • SomeJoe

    As a long-time resident of the East Village, this doesn't surprise me at all. The most infuriating thing about my "progressive" neighborhood is how much it loves stasis and fears all change.



    This is a dumb law which will hold back the continued evolution of the LES.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com