Quantcast

These Streets Were Made For Newsstands

2005_08_newsstand2.jpgInteresting: A court ruled that newsstand owners should be paid if city decides to "remove or replace their newsstands." The city has been looking at bids from a number of companies to provide new "street furniture," because the new street furniture will mean more places to put advertising. What's interesting that while the Newsstand Operators Associations gives a value of $5 million for the 300 newsstands at risk (which is averages $16,000 a pop), any deal for new newsstands will be worth much much more.

The NY Press had a rant about the "Street Furniture Initiative": "Michael Bloomberg is the right mayor to oversee the Times Square-ification of the city. A businessman-robot who made his fortune in part by stamping his own name onto anything that would fit the nine letters, he is unable to compute that anyone could have a problem with standardizing, branding and selling everything that can be standardized, branded and sold."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Dan Berkman

    Sometimes I just don't understand what is with some New Yorkers. Firstly, things change. This is a big city with lots of different people and things. If you want to move someplace where the city infrastructure never changes there are plenty of quiet New England towns that will never ever get a traffic light.

    Secondly, the current newstands are crappy little containers that are neither an efficient use of their owners space or a good use of city sidewalks. If the mayor wants us all to have great new clean well lighted street furniture and kiosks and the city gets some advertising monies for putting some posters on the back, fine. It sure beats looking at the decerept old container that sells my morning paper.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com