Gothamist: Moving Through the Park With Moliere

Bialystock

Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:11:51 -0500

Fair enough - but consider your sunk costs and don't base your review on bitterness you felt on waiting in line (with the rest of us)....two - Portman is Portman, regardless of flick or writer or director, love her or hate her....three - people will argue greatly on the direction...but fourth, most importantly, that was an undeserved, unnecessary, subjective, cheap shot - that many would argue about - that should stay out of Gothamist postings like this. Save it for the actual reviews.

garth

Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:59:43 -0500

oh no, we waited in line for over ten hours. it was the show that bothered us. we thought mike nichols direction was lazy and that while chirstopher walken and meryl streep were good, phillip seymor hoffman was phoning it in and natalie portman was about as interesting to watch as a rock. its probably better to say we're bitter that we did wait in line...

Bialystock

Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:29:32 -0500

What was wrong with the Seagull, we thought it was great!!! It was free to everyone who was willing to wait in the line for tickets, rather than those willing to pay tons....and that was great for us and a great show. Gothamist bitter they didn't wait in line?