<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: MTA Ponders Brooklyn Railyard Bids</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/25/mta_ponders_brooklyn_railyard_bids.php</link>
<description>All comments for MTA Ponders Brooklyn Railyard Bids</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>ratnerville</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/25/mta_ponders_brooklyn_railyard_bids.php#comment-56949</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/25/mta_ponders_brooklyn_railyard_bids.php#comment-56949</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:08:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Develop Don&apos;t Destroy Brooklyn also recommends reading this so that Gothamist and gotham dwellers can get the muddy numbers clear. Its not too difficult (read: Extell has offered way more cash, and Ratner has padded his piddly $50 million with extras that Extell will build as well.) Thats where Gothamist got it wrong. Ratner and Extell are proposing to build the same things for the MTA, a platform and a new, relocated rail yard. Yet that Greed Machine Ratner decided that those costs should be included in his purchase price. 

When I buy some property I&apos;d love to consider the cost of future improvements part of my purchase price. Hey  you,  your property is worth 100 million? HOW ABOUT I&apos;ll give you 50 million for that land, and since i&apos;m going to pour another 50 million into it, why don&apos;t you just pretend, along with me, that I&apos;m paying you 100 million.

anyway, I digress. that chart again at DDDB which explains it, is here&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>