<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Ratner Starts Spreading His News</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php</link>
<description>All comments for Ratner Starts Spreading His News</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2007 arts_jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:33:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jencarlson@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jencarlson@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>lumi</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55798</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55798</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:45:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To riff off Forest City Ratner&apos;s business parnter in Times Square, here&apos;s a good slogan for The Standard:

&quot;All the news that&apos;s printed to fit&quot;

Rocknrope was curious about the advertisers in The Brooklyn Standard.  I don&apos;t have it in front of me, but I recall that there was a full-page ad from BAM and NY Aquarium.  Bruce Ratner is on the board of BAM, but the Aquarium connection is a mystery.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>daniel</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55738</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55738</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;sorry about the hacky formatting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>daniel</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55736</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55736</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:14:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;<![CDATA[Gringcorp is right, nolandgrab.net is the go to site for all things Ratner. DDDB.net is not really a news site or blog. 

having said that, DDDB did comment on Ratner's Brooklyn Pravda when it came out in June, here

or to save you time, here it is: 


Shilly 
        Behavior: More Standard Ratner
        Meanwhile...Forest City Ratner (FCR) is distributing 140,000 copies of 
        their latest PR gambit: a full color, 16-page glossy tabloid called The 
        Brooklyn Standard (download pdf). 
        FCR calls it a &quot;newspaper.&quot; It's full of pertinent information 
        from civic giants like Marv Albert (huh?) and local elected officials 
        like State Senator Marty Golden (22nd District, Southern Brooklyn). That's 
        the same Marty Golden who told DDDB in a meeting that he would never want 
        such a project built in his district; now that is a NIMBY. There 
        is also an interesting article, &quot;Old Brooklyn: A Look Into Brooklyn's 
        Rich Architectural History.&quot; In the article, which focuses on Brooklyn 
        Heights in particular, FCR has the gall to publish this concluding paragraph: 
         
      When Robert Moses invaded neighborhoods, he demolished brownstones 
        through the power of the Housing Act of 1949. Had not the homeowners protested, 
        all of Columbia Heights would have been leveled. Moses' incursion 
        sparked a backlash of preservation which partially resulted in establishment 
        of the Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1965 and the first neighborhood 
        landmarked in the state was Brooklyn Heights, helping ensure the sense 
        of intimacy that surrounds these contemporary gems of realty.
      Is FCR self-delusional? Don't they see Robert Moses when they look in the 
      mirror?
      
      There is also an article by James Caldwell, President of BUILD, who will 
      oversee the jobs component of what FCR calls a community benefits agreement. 
      This is the same James Caldwell who, in the Brooklyn 
      Eagle, said, &quot;I would be for this project if it only provided 
      10 jobs.&quot; And in The 
      Brooklyn Papers said, &quot;Let's face it, this project is only 
      $3 billion. We know it won't cure the ills of our community. But guess 
      what? It brings us hope. And Ratner knows by giving a little 
      here, he's getting back much more in return.&quot;
      
      FCR claims, in this 
      Daily News article about the tabloid, that their latest PR stunt, is 
      not in response to the DBLC's Atlantic 
      Yards News tabloid which came out last month. Well, we believe it is. 
      FCR sure is spending a lot of money to have a one-way &quot;conversation&quot; 
      with Brooklyn, whose support they erroneously claim to have.]]>&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jim</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55734</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55734</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:59:57 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;About the proposed &quot;Atlantic Terminal&quot; development, my attitude on all these public projects is it&apos;s OK as long as I don&apos;t have to pay for it.  By that I mean I don&apos;t want to pay for more cops to patrol the area, I don&apos;t want to pay for subsidies for the builders, or pay more taxes because they are getting tax breaks, or pay to have streets widened, or any other changes to infrastructure caused by the building or its subsequent use, or pay the local building owners for their homes to be torn down, or pay the salaries of EPA and DOB buildings working on this project, or anything else.  I know something&apos;s going to get built on those rail yards.  Somebody will make a lot of money on the deal.  The least the City can do is lessen the impact on me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Steve O.</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55711</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55711</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:23:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Check out NY Press columnist Aaron Naparstek&apos;s recent take on the A&apos; Yards.

He&apos;s a genius!

http://www.nypress.com/18/28/news&amp;columns/aaronnaparstek.cfm&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gringcorp</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55703</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55703</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;No worries. The go-to place for Ratner/stadium antics is nolandgrab.org. It&apos;s a bit more comprehensive than the DDDB site.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jen</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55701</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55701</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:17:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gringcorp - true, it seems we&apos;re late to the party on this one!  Thanks for pointing this out... I haven&apos;t been blessed with receiving this myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>daybird</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55666</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55666</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:00:47 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;the NY Times was a Robert Moses Cheerleader as he paved over ever square inch he could get his hands on, so their love of Ratner is no different.

When the lady at the Bergen 2/3 handed the Ratner Rag to me this morning, I was going to get into it with her, but it was obvious she had no clue about it either way.  Oh how I wish Marty M or Mister Ratner himself would get out there and do their dirty work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rocknrope</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55665</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55665</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:57:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I took one at the 7th Avenue Park Slope station.  I knew it was a Ratner propaganda rag as soon as I saw the title &quot;BROOKLYN BOOMING!&quot;  As Jack mentioned, clearly transparent.  I tossed it as soon as I walked onto the platform.  

I did wonder about the companies who advertised in it though.  Did they comp advertising in it, or was it just dirt cheap?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>alan</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55662</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55662</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:49:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You mean the 2 and 3 stop at Grand Army, Hijiki?  I can&apos;t stand either of those guys.  Now there&apos;s going to be three idiots that I have to get past in order to get into the subway station.  What ever happened to just having a paper stand by the entrance?  

As for the Ratner Standard, it&apos;s just sickening.  Propaganda at its foulest...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rh</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55660</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55660</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:46:03 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey careful what you say HR--the sheep soooooo might follow you back to Manhattan!  You know, being sheep and all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gringcorp</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55659</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55659</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:45:53 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dubious indeed it is. Three weeks old, also, it is, as I discovered when, um, breaking this myself.

http://gumbyfresh.blogspot.com/2005/07/one-for-hamster-cage.html &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mrf</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55655</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55655</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:36:06 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Brooklyn Papers (eg the Park Slope Paper) have been covering Ratner very unfairly, seemingly going out of their way to find stories that paint Ratner in a bad light (for several weeks they were beating the drum about a rash of...pickpockets (gasp!) at Ratner&apos;s new Atlantic Center.

Meanwhile, the NYT has taken the opposite tack, casually dismissing critics of the plan in every article they write. (Of course Ratner building the new NYT headquarters couldn&apos;t have anything to do with it...I hope.)

Anyway, while I was initially really turned off by the Daily Ratner when I saw it a few weeks ago, it&apos;s not that bad. It doesn&apos;t try to hide its source and Ratner is entitled to whatever means he feels is appropriate for getting his voice heard by the public.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hijiki</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55653</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55653</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:33:15 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;at my subway stop in prospect heights, where there are normally 2 guys handing out &apos;metro&apos; and &apos;am new york&apos;, both were abscent and only a &apos;brooklyn standard&apos; guy was there. hmm.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jack</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55651</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55651</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:26:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is so crass and transparent it&apos;s pathetic.

But it begs the question: Why?

It seems as if Ratner is the 800 lb. gorilla of the Atlantic Yards project.  So why this? And why now? What can Ratner gain at this point by putting out this shilling broadsheet?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hr</title>
<link>http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55648</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gothamist.com/2005/07/14/ratner_starts_spreading_his_news.php#comment-55648</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:13:54 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ahhh..  SOOOOOO glad I moved back into Manhattan when all the sheep suddenly discovered how great brooklyn was.    was.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>